Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Neil C vs Natwest - the final stages? *** WON ***


neilc123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6267 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I haven't posted much here but I just want to say thank you to everyone who's contributed to the wealth of information available on this site. Truly brilliant and I couldn't have got this far without it!

 

:)

 

Anyway, I've been going through the small claims process for several months now and have reached the stage where it appears a court date has been set. However, I've done searches for "General Form Of Judgment or Order", which is the letter I've just received from the court, and it appears there's no standard letter that the courts are sending out.

 

"Upon the Courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to this order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

It is ordered that

 

1. directions will be given in this case by the designated civil judge, His Honour Judge G Hickinbottom, on the 26th March etc etc.

2. The parties may appear in person or make written representations as to how the case should proceed provided a copy of the representations is sent to the court and the other side at least 7 working days prior to the hearing."

 

So, I have a few questions:

 

1 - This is a hearing to see which direction the case will go, right? There won't actually be a ruling?

2 - Shall I prepare my court bundle, just in case?

3 - Shall I send it in to the court and/or Cobblers?

4 - Is there anything else I should do in preparation?

5 - What's the likelihood of me actually having to go? Are NatWest actually settling before these dates?

 

Thank you everyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi neil, thanks for pm,

yes its the same letter i received,i am working on your questions as they are the same as mine:)

1 - This is a hearing to see which direction the case will go, right? There won't actually be a ruling? As far as i know YES i think its a case management conference

2 - Shall I prepare my court bundle, just in case? I am just in case

3 - Shall I send it in to the court and/or Cobblers? Not sure, i will get back to you on that one

4 - Is there anything else I should do in preparation? Read other threads and get as much info as poss. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mercantile-court-cases-stays/36034-case-management-conference-13th.html its not exact to us but it gives you an idea of what might happen

5 - What's the likelihood of me actually having to go? Are NatWest actually settling before these dates? Not 100% but Natwest seem to be settling before the hearing, but its still worth being prepared just in case

If we keep each other informed of our progress we can help each other out :D also Brenda/Bruce is due in on the same day to so keep an eye on that thread too.

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

"Upon the Courts own motion. The court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to this order, you must make an application to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it.

 

It is ordered that

 

1. directions will be given in this case by the designated civil judge, His Honour Judge G Hickinbottom, on the 26th March etc etc.

2. The parties may appear in person or make written representations as to how the case should proceed provided a copy of the representations is sent to the court and the other side at least 7 working days prior to the hearing."

 

So, I have a few questions:

 

1 - This is a hearing to see which direction the case will go, right? There won't actually be a ruling?

2 - Shall I prepare my court bundle, just in case?

3 - Shall I send it in to the court and/or Cobblers?

4 - Is there anything else I should do in preparation?

5 - What's the likelihood of me actually having to go? Are NatWest actually settling before these dates?

 

Thank you everyone!

 

Hi Neil,

 

In answer to your questions:

 

1. Yep

2. Defo, it's good to be ahead and not need it, then balls it up altogether, right?

3.Yes, and only if you've had a request via the court to forward all necessary 'evidence' you intend to rely on

4. Pray:D

5. The likelihood of having to go to court is still pretty slim, but there is always a slim chance. The fact of the matter is the natwest will have to divulge information relating to how they go about charging us (the customers) and that, my friend, is something they definately do not want to do. Court is a worry, but there is no need to cry over spilt milk, if you get me. Just wait and see how everything pans out. make sure you do everything Mr judge tells you to and you'll be home free:D

 

Hope this helps clarify things.

Good luck.

:DSUCCESSESS:D

NATWEST01&02 won over 4k

See how

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-successes/31683-muggins73-natwest.html

 

:)CURRENT CLAIMS:)

HALIFAX03

19-SEPT-07 APPLICATION TO HAVE STAY LIFTED

02-OCT-07 APPLICATION REFUSED

LLOYDS TSB04

10-MAY-07 LBA

 

ABBEY05

19-SEPT-07 LBA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

see below

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

also this might help getting it together

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/barclays-bank/29032-help-preparing-court-bundle.html

 

its in the barclays forum but the bundle will be the same

:)I am not an expert at this, any advice i give is from reading posts on this site, its all in here somewhere :)

 

:) If i have helped please click the scales:)

 

NatWest Settled 16th february 2007----£3902.67 All charges, costs and s.69 interest

 

MBNA- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 25th March 2007

MBNA missed deadline, LBA for SAR sent 8th May 2007

CCA request sent 8th May 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll jsut need to go to the bank templates section, http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html

for help on preparing the court bundle.

:DSUCCESSESS:D

NATWEST01&02 won over 4k

See how

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-successes/31683-muggins73-natwest.html

 

:)CURRENT CLAIMS:)

HALIFAX03

19-SEPT-07 APPLICATION TO HAVE STAY LIFTED

02-OCT-07 APPLICATION REFUSED

LLOYDS TSB04

10-MAY-07 LBA

 

ABBEY05

19-SEPT-07 LBA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good lad, now just sit back and wait I'm afraid.

 

Altogether now...SHOW ME THE MONEY......SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!

:DSUCCESSESS:D

NATWEST01&02 won over 4k

See how

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-successes/31683-muggins73-natwest.html

 

:)CURRENT CLAIMS:)

HALIFAX03

19-SEPT-07 APPLICATION TO HAVE STAY LIFTED

02-OCT-07 APPLICATION REFUSED

LLOYDS TSB04

10-MAY-07 LBA

 

ABBEY05

19-SEPT-07 LBA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Something's come up and there's a slim possibility that I won't be able to make it to the court date. I probably will be there, but I just want to be fully prepared on the off-chance.

 

Does anybody know what I should do, or if there's any letter I should write to the court and Cobblers to let them know I won't be there?

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got just the thing! -

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

 

YOU v LLOYDS BANK PLC

In the ***** COUNTY COURT

CLAIM No:*******

 

I, the Claimant, refer to the claim as detailed above and specifically the Preliminary hearing scheduled for **/**/**.

 

I wish offer my apologies to the honourable court for my non-attendance at this hearing, which is due to... (add reason). As such, pursuant to the order made by district judge ****** on **/**/**, I wish to make my written representations as to how this claim should proceed.

 

If the court is in agreement, the Claimant respectfully suggests that directions could be made as per the attached draft order.

 

If ordered, the Claimant believes these directions will allow the overriding objective's to be furthered in that they will fully identify the most fundemental issues in dispute (as detailed below), and allow them to be assessed so that this claim may proceed justly and expediously.

 

- The crux upon which this claim rests is the true cost incurred by the Defendent as a result of the contractual breach from which its charges arise. If the Defendent cannot substantiate the cost of each charge as proportionate to its loss incurred, it has charged contractual penalties contrary to the UTCCR 1999 and common law principles establised since the early 1900's.

 

- In the event that the Defendents charges were accepted as being a fee for a service (which is denied), examination of its true costs is required to determine whether the price is reasonable as required by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

As the law relating to contractual penalties is long established, the Claimant believes the outstanding issues to be of fact. Accordingly, the Claimant respectfully requests that the claim be allocated to the small claims track, and estimates that the hearing of the claim should last no longer than one hour.

 

A copy of this letter and draft directions has also been sent to the Defendent.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Attach the draft directions and send a copy to Cobbets as well.

 

Also see here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/64911-got-court-date-guide.html#post553523

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - no bundle required yet. Its highly likely that you'll get settled before the prelim I'd have thought, but if not then the judge will issue directions (hopefully the one's you'll have proposed) at the hearing and then you'll have to submit whats required which will include the court bundle.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...