Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive, and an untrained eye would not of seen what the seller had done.  Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.   
    • The economy grew by 0.6% in the first three months of the year, ending a shallow recession.View the full article
    • First of all it sounds as if your retailer is very decent and very responsible. This itself is unusual in these kinds of circumstances and I think we need to bear this in mind. The guarantee is not particularly relevant and in fact the dealer had a statutory duty to exercise a certain responsibility for your computer – probably for several years as their obligation under the consumer rights act. The dealer may not have known this and it simply acting out of a sense of moral responsibility and that is even more noteworthy. You've already suggested earlier that you didn't really want to cause problems for your retailer. I think that you will need the help of your retailer as well in order to get information and evidence. I suggest that you proceed against DPD – but before you do that – I suggest that you have a discussion with the retailer. Tell them that this is what you are going to be doing and you would like to have a copy of anything they have which relates to the special instructions which apparently your dealer has already informed you about in relation to where item should be left. Secondly, maybe you should tell your dealer about this site and also about this thread. I can imagine like many dealers who are frequently sending items by means of couriers, they have had things go missing. Tell them that we will be very happy to help them recover money for lost or damaged or stolen items – and that is regardless of whether or not they have purchased insurance. Apart from being very pleased to help your dealer recover items which have been lost by irresponsible parcel delivery companies, I think we need to encourage the complicity between you and them so they will be pleased to support you in your claim against DPD. It will be helpful if you can get a copy of the instructions that you have referred to above, and also if you can get some written evidence of your own instruction that your laptop should be left in a safe place. Have you done the reading on this sub- forum? You will need to do lots of reading of many of the similar stories on this sub- forum. They won't necessarily be against DPD but the principles will broadly be the same. Also read the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum in order to understand many of the principles involved. Getting your money back but be quick – but your chances of success are better than 90% that you can bank on it taking anything up to a year. Have you got anything in writing from DPD either refusing you or telling you that they won't discuss with you?  
    • Thank you for telling us the text of the letter you had from the police. As we don't seem to have come across this before, it would be really useful for us to see the original please. HB
    • Pasco has recalled 104,000 packs of sliced bread after rat remains were found in at least two packs.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can DCA re-default a default?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5896 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am currently disputing a default from a current account overdraft. However in the meantime, "my debt" has been sold to a DCA and the default marked satisfied under a partial settlement special instructor.

 

Regardless of the dispute outcome, if there is a deed of assignation (and even if there is not) can a DCA default the debt under a separate entry? Basically is it possible for the same debt to appear twice on a credit report as a default.

 

Thanks,

 

OSL

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, a default cannot appear twice for one debt.

 

however, it can be sold and a default re-submitted by the buyer.

 

in your case, as you have settled, i would doubt a default would be entered again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, a default cannot appear twice for one debt.

 

however, it can be sold and a default re-submitted by the buyer.

 

in your case, as you have settled, i would doubt a default would be entered again.

 

Many thanks, but I have not settled the debt, but it shows as satisfied on the original creditors default entry as they have sold the debt to the DCA.

 

So in this case, if the debt is sold on 10 times, a total of 11 defaults could (theoretically) appear?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So in this case, if the debt is sold on 10 times, a total of 11 defaults could (theoretically) appear?

 

No ... only 1 default can show for 1 account.

 

When it is sold, the creditor has to remove their default in their name, and the new creditor will then issue their own, in their own name.

 

In this way, an account can be in default forever (theoretically) as the creditor can sell it just before the 6 years (when it falls off).

 

This is why debt agencies chase 5 year old accounts.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi OneStepLeft,

 

Welcome to the forum :)

 

I'm afraid I disagree with tifo on this point. I believe that only one default can be issued per debt. If a creditor sells it on to a DCA then they can register it in their name but it should be dated the same i.e. from the original date of default. Otherwise you could have a perpetual default showing on your record. See the article below and judge for yourself.

 

Also I don't see how a DCA can default you of their own accord (from a new date) unless you have entered into a payment arrangement with them and then breached that arrangement.

 

This is my own interpretation but apparently some guidelines are soon to be issued from the OFT/FSA (not sure which) in the near future that will hopefully answer these questions once and for all.

 

Caledonian Express, UK - Credit, Loans and Banking : Mortgages, Remortgages, Loans (secured and unsecured), Car Finance, Credit Cards, Bank Accounts

 

Regards, Pam

  • Haha 1

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pam, we've discussed this in detail on the other thread. :)

 

The way i state it is the way it seems to work, however, maybe some debt agencies use their own new date and some decide to keep the old one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tifo

 

I guess we will have to just agree to differ on this one but as we know, most DCA's are a law unto themselves and either do not know, or choose to ignore, applicable legislation etc.

 

Until this is clarified by OFT/FSA I shall challenge any DCA defaults and they will have to prove me wrong!

 

Regards, Pam

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info both of you.

 

I hope this situation does not occur. I am actually liable for the debt in this case and will now be settling with the DCA as soon as I can bring myself to make the call, purely because the DCA in question has a horrific reputation online (Thames Credit). However I honestly never received any default notice or even any calls about it and have sent a CCA letter from that link.

 

I spoke with the bank (on phone and in branch) who were less than helpful and could only give me details about the default that the credit report already gave me. Critically (hopefully) they could not tell me what address the default was served to (which would help me understand why I might not have received the notice) so I am hoping that this means that I might be successful based on the letter. I am assuming that that CCA clause refers to overdrafts in addition to the more common types of credit.

 

Call me cynical, bf the bank takes the default off and it is resubmitted by the DCA (as described), then I would imagine a "I'll pay it off in full" offer to the DCA would be more likely to be successful in getting the default removed than with the bank themselves?

 

Again, thanks. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am actually liable for the debt in this case and will now be settling with the DCA as soon as I can bring myself to make the call.

 

Call me cynical, bf the bank takes the default off and it is resubmitted by the DCA (as described), then I would imagine a "I'll pay it off in full" offer to the DCA would be more likely to be successful in getting the default removed than with the bank themselves?

 

Why are you going to pay it off if the debt was assigned as it should have been by law?

 

I doubt they would take the default off, but would show it as settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you going to pay it off if the debt was assigned as it should have been by law?

 

I doubt they would take the default off, but would show it as settled.

 

Sorry I am a bit confused by that. Could you elaborate?

 

I still owe the money, which is why I am planning on paying it off (to the DCA not the bank).

 

The default already shows as Satisfied (is that the same as Settled?) as the DCA paid the Bank, therefore the bank marked it Satisfied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oddly and perhaps related, but today I went into my Credit report, and the account entry for a credit card for the same bank, not the same account I reference in this thread has disappeared. It was a couple of years old so perhaps it is just coincidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, a default cannot appear twice for one debt.

 

however, it can be sold and a default re-submitted by the buyer.

 

in your case, as you have settled, i would doubt a default would be entered again.

 

 

Hi,

 

Just so i can understand this better. I have some defaults which are due to fall off my files. Can this debt now be resold and a new default put on my file without my having any agreement with the prospective new buyer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can see, yes, that *could* happen because you have not settled the debt.

 

You are not obliged to pay it after 6 years, but it could still be present on your file for as long as the chain continues and it remains unpaid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default already shows as Satisfied (is that the same as Settled?) as the DCA paid the Bank, therefore the bank marked it Satisfied.

 

No, the bank marked it satisfied because they sold it at a discount to the DCA. The DCA did not pay your debt, they bought it for, maybe, £3 per £100 of debt. Then they try and get the whole amount from you. The bank just writes off the difference in their tax.

 

The DCA can then issue their own default for the debt, but the bank would have to remove their own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the bank marked it satisfied because they sold it at a discount to the DCA. The DCA did not pay your debt, they bought it for, maybe, £3 per £100 of debt. Then they try and get the whole amount from you. The bank just writes off the difference in their tax.

 

The DCA can then issue their own default for the debt, but the bank would have to remove their own.

 

Yep, sorry, I didn't mean that the DCA paid my debt in full, but rather sold on at a discount (been reading so much on the subject my eyes are set to pop).

 

Hopefully I will have success with the CCA I sent to the bank regarding non-receipt of the default notice. Presumably if I pay the DCA (which I am going to do) then the matter will be closed apart from the default.

 

What would be a realistic amount to offer the DCA for full and final settlement, and also would the CDA levy charges which I would *have* to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the bank marked it satisfied because they sold it at a discount to the DCA. The DCA did not pay your debt, they bought it for, maybe, £3 per £100 of debt. Then they try and get the whole amount from you. The bank just writes off the difference in their tax.

 

The DCA can then issue their own default for the debt, but the bank would have to remove their own.

 

 

Can they issue a default if there has been no contact in the last six years?

 

There was a default registered less than six years ago, but I have had no contact within the last six years. Eg Default may 2001 last contact july 2000. As far as I understand it this debt is now unenforceable due to the Limitation Act? ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I really think this warrants a letter to the relevant authority (Is it OFT?) that regulates the credit industry. If it is correct that defaults could be entered ad infinitum (which I am not personally convinced about) then this has HUGE implications for consumers.

 

Since a bankrupt can now be discharged in as little as 6 months and can then start to rebuild their financial lives I don't see how it can possibly be fair to have a situation where a credit consumer could potentially be 'blacklisted' for an indefinite period. I realise that a notice of bankruptcy stays on the credit report for 6 years but when a bankrupt is discharged there is often a lot of his debt left unpaid. I am certain that none of his creditors can then pursue the unpaid debts after the date of discharge (within the 6 year period) and cannot enter new adverse information on his credit file, so how could it be fair to continuously impede a non-bankrupt debtor's financial recovery in this way?! :confused:

 

Regards, Pam

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I really think this warrants a letter to the relevant authority (Is it OFT?) that regulates the credit industry. If it is correct that defaults could be entered ad infinitum (which I am not personally convinced about) then this has HUGE implications for consumers.

 

Since a bankrupt can now be discharged in as little as 6 months and can then start to rebuild their financial lives I don't see how it can possibly be fair to have a situation where a credit consumer could potentially be 'blacklisted' for an indefinite period. I realise that a notice of bankruptcy stays on the credit report for 6 years but when a bankrupt is discharged there is often a lot of his debt left unpaid. I am certain that none of his creditors can then pursue the unpaid debts after the date of discharge (within the 6 year period) and cannot enter new adverse information on his credit file, so how could it be fair to continuously impede a non-bankrupt debtor's financial recovery in this way?! :confused:

 

Regards, Pam

 

Thanks for the info - this site is very helpful. Re these defaults , this seems like a ridiculous [problem] by the DCA's which could be never ending as they shuffle the papers from one arm of their organisiation to another.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this seems like a ridiculous [problem] by the DCA's which could be never ending as they shuffle the papers from one arm of their organisiation to another.

 

Exactly right .....

 

and the banks also collude ... after 5.5 years they sell the debt on ... thereby starting another 6 year cycle ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the fact that this is an agreed overdraft affect me in any way? I.e. this is not the typical loan or credit card scenario, and I am not sure I signed anything specifically relating to the overdraft, so I am assuming it is contained within the T's and C's of the current account agreement I did sign?

 

Just hoping the CCA request I sent is valid in this case, as I saw another thread where a DCA came back in a letter and said it was different because it was an overdraft, although other people contributing to the thread told the thread starter that was rubbish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

It would appear, according to an OFT document on agreements I have just read, that overdrafts are EXEMPT from the CCA. See excerpt below. I don't really know what else you can do, apart from paying up, as you said you would, and hoping the DCA doesn't add a new default.

 

Regards, Pam

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, forgot to add the excerpt from OFT. :o

 

 

There are two further, highly specialised, types of exemption which can be granted by the Office of Fair Trading from, among other things, the rules on form and content of agreements. A general exemption has been granted for the Bank of England, other banks and licensed deposit-taking institutions, in respect of their arrangements for providing overdraft facilities on current accounts.

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pam, apparently I need to spread some reputation around...!

 

I found something similar at this link - BBA - British Bankers' Association - BBA Response to the DTI Consultation Document on the Financial Limits and Exempt Agreements - Question 16.B

 

Does it categorically exclude the requirement for the bank to respond to CCA requests though? Clutching at straws maybe, however the text does say it is a partial exemption.

 

Hi,

 

I don't really know what else you can do, apart from paying up, as you said you would, and hoping the DCA doesn't add a new default.

 

Regards, Pam

 

Based on your previous responses, are you saying that the risk is the DCA can add another entry with the same date, or append a new name to the existing default (and hence have the same date).

 

Would credit searchers see two defaults or one, regardless of whether they had identical amounts/dates?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've read the info. in the link you posted and it seems to me that overdrafts ARE regulated agreements under the CCA but have partial exemption in that the banks do not have to comply with the 'form and content' part of the Act so a normal written agreement is not necessary. They must however give OD limit and interest charges etc. in writing.

 

So, as far as section 77/78 CCA requests go then they do not have to send copy of 'executed' agreement as there wouldn't have been one of these but they are still required to send state of account statement etc.

 

Regarding the default issue, this is the big debate at the moment but I would not accept 2 different dates/entries on my file for the same debt and would challenge it vigorously!!

 

We have not yet been able to locate any definitive answer to this so can only hope that the new regulatory body (??) can set the record straight once and for all.

 

The only thing you can do is check your credit records at regular intervals and, if any default is repeated, challenge it in whatever way seems appropriate.

 

I'm sorry I can't give any straight answers but I am just a Joe(anna) Public and still trying to make sense of all this legislation myself. :confused:

 

The great disgrace of the CCA's inception is that until quite recently ( internet access etc) the ordinary public knew only that it existed but had no idea of ALL their rights under the legislation. Lenders put only as much CCA info. as legally required into their credit agreements and in my opinion have profited enormously from our ignorance.

 

Well, I think our collective message to them now is

 

YOUR GAME IS UP!!!

 

 

Rant of the day completed! :D

 

Regards, Pam

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...