Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fishy vs Lloyds (2 x business + 1 x personal)


Fishy Dave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6252 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I've set up an parachute account with the Co-op (via FSB), so am feeling safe and ready to go.

 

Have spent a bit of time reading through the site, and have decided the best course of action is to treat my two business accounts (sole trader) and my personal accounts as if they are seperate? Would you agree?

 

I have three seperate letters addressed to Penny Berryman at Lloyds, with three seperate amounts of £10 payable to Lloyds TSB (or should that be Lloyds TSB Plc?).

 

Ooh, this is going to be fun! :D

 

Cheers, Fishy Dave (the name comes from my aquarium business if you're wondering? :razz:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome Fishy Dave:D

 

Good to see it looks like you've done a lot of reading here. That helps.

 

I claimed on 2 personal accounts together (1 was joint) with no problem: just had a full settlement offer (just under £5k) although as you probably have sussed, Lloyds TSB Plc are unlikely to cough up before you at least commence court action.

 

So yes, you can lump accounts together. As a sole trader (not a limited company) I believe I am right in saying that it's the same as a personal account as far as the laws (and the data protection act) are concerned, so I'd put one request in (with all 3 account numbers etc) and one £10.

 

Once you know how much yr claiming, you can then split the claim up if you need, to keep under the £5k limit for (the faster track) small claims court.

 

I think the consensus is to only issue one claim at a time though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean a parachute account?

 

Cannot use SAR for business accounts. To overcome you should be able to print the statements on line, I think they go back around 4 years and the banks should keep statement for the balance and they should provide them to you if you ask nicely, make up some excuse like a revenue inspection - no lies though!

 

Business and personal account will have to be separate claims as there are different arguments relating to each. I am not sure if you can combine 2 business accounts, I will leave that for some one else to advise on.

 

Anyway you have your work cut out obtaining all those statements.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both, and yes, I did mean a parachute account, oops!

 

It will be interesting to see how they class the business accounts. One has always been in just the business name, the other is Fast Films t/a David Smitheram, although they are both the same type of account.

 

I think i'll continue with 3 seperate requests for data, worst case it is an extra £20 spent.

 

Will let you know how things progress.... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Fishy, good luck!

All advice is offered in good faith based on my own research and understanding of the laws involved, however I'm not a lawyer!

 

Please dont rely on annoymous advice posted on a public forum without checking it out for yourself first!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realise you meant a parachute account, just playing.

 

If you are not sure if they are business accounts then a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) will do no harm, they should not cash the cheque if they do not provide the statements.

 

Ordinarily I would say one SAR and £10 for all the accounts, however you do not want to prejudice your personal account position.

 

You never know they may just overlook and provide the statements even if a business account.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

You never know they may just overlook and provide the statements even if a business account.

 

Looks like you could be right. I received a letter today from the Copy statement unit, which lists all three accounts at once in the same letter, and mentions only a single £10 charge.

 

In brief the letter mentions i will have statements as far back as September 2001.

It does offer the option of having them before this date, although I don't think there is any point?

 

The letter is dated 07/03/07, with their reference being 26/01.

 

Will update when the statements arrive..... :)

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All,

I wrote a letter on the 20th jan 07 with a 4 single cheques of £10.00 I have two business accounts and one persoanl and no responce, do you get ann acknowledgement letter back.. Can anyone help..

 

Jane

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent mine on the 23rd of January, and the letter which arrived yesterday is the first and only acknowledgement I have had.

Others will be better at advising, i'm still very new.

 

You are welcome to stay on my thread, but you may be better to start a new thread just for you? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not good with computers how do I do this help.. Jane

 

If you click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/ This will take you back to the section of this forum with all of the Lloyds TSB claims. Look for the button saying 'New Thread' ( above all of the 'sticky threads', to the left of all of the page numbers.

Click on 'New Thread' and start typing your title and then the message. Let us know what you have done so far, dates and letters etc.

I will keep an eye on your situation too as it sounds like we have similar circumstances with both business and personal accounts.

 

Hope that helps, cheers, Dave :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've added up all of the fines across all three accounts and they add up to £4756!

So, if going for the 8% interest it makes £5291.61.

 

I wonder whether to go for the 8% instead of pushing for compound interest? Thinking it must be a lot easier?

 

Would you be tempted to put my three bank accounts into one claim (two sole trader business, one personal account)?

 

Cheers, Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fishy - I'm still quite new to this myself, but I think there is a max amount of 5k for the MCOL if your going down this route.

 

I'm not sure but if you ask the question on here I'm sure you will get a good answer.

 

Good luck with it all, I'm thinking of doing the same with my old sole tradere account £1,500, but I still have two business loans to consider, both for about £3.5k each, I dont want to put myself in a difficult situ with these.

Lloyds TSB reclaiming £2587 - 1st letter sent 12/3 :D

Lloyds TSB Business reclaiming £1065 - Not yet started ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the £5k limit was before interest and court fees? If so, then I guess I should be ok with either the 8% or compound?

 

Main things putting me off the compound route is the complexity of working it all out, and secondly if it's likely to make the claim a lot longer?

 

Thanks, and good luck with your claim Wilky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello all, I could do with your help please. :)

 

I'm at the stage where I have sent off my letter before action last week, and have had a response from Lloyds this morning.

 

Just to recap, i'm claiming for the charges on my personal account and my two sole trader accounts, and have put this within one claim.

 

The response from Lloyds is fairly long, with the usual type of content you'd expect to hear. The areas of concerns for me are -

 

'The office of fair trading has published new guidelines on credit card default charges. We're still talking it through with them, but the important point is that the guidelines are about 'default' charges that people pay when they break an agreement with us. This doesn't apply to your charges as these were for dealing with your request to go over your agreed overdraft limit. They are not default charges because you haven't broken your agreement. They are our prices for the service we provide in these situations.'

 

 

Surely a charge is a charge?! If I have been charged £35 for exceeding my overdraft limit this is more that it costs Lloyds in admin costs and time, which is the principal behind us claiming back these charges?

 

 

Secondly -

'I've noticed that you've referred to the unfair contracts terms act 1977 and the unfair terms in consumer contracts regulations but these don't apply to you as you're a business customer and these acts and regulations only apply to consumers.'

 

 

I was expecting this bit in a way, but seeing as one of the three accounts is a personal one it still has some relevance.

 

So, what next? Proceed as normal, wait another week then start the court claim?

 

Many thanks, Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave,

 

Don't worry about the first bit as this is part of their standard blurb. Not sure about the second as I have not started on my sole trader account yet. There is a thread somewhere mentioning how to go about business accounts; I'll see if I can find it. Whilst the charges are unfair regardless of the type of account they are governed by different acts.

Sorry I can't be of more help.

 

broke dave

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to my last. Go to Claiming on a Business Account - Lets Join Forces. You'll find it under the general header.

 

broke dave

broke dave v LTSB WON £3840 2 weeks before court.

Mrs broke dave v Barclays accepted offer £355.

broke dave v LTSB (Business) Prelim stage.

broke dave v LTSB (2nd Claim) LBA stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all, I could do with your help please. :)

 

I'm at the stage where I have sent off my letter before action last week, and have had a response from Lloyds this morning.

 

Just to recap, i'm claiming for the charges on my personal account and my two sole trader accounts, and have put this within one claim.

 

The response from Lloyds is fairly long, with the usual type of content you'd expect to hear. The areas of concerns for me are -

 

'The office of fair trading has published new guidelines on credit card default charges. We're still talking it through with them, but the important point is that the guidelines are about 'default' charges that people pay when they break an agreement with us. This doesn't apply to your charges as these were for dealing with your request to go over your agreed overdraft limit. They are not default charges because you haven't broken your agreement. They are our prices for the service we provide in these situations.'

 

 

Surely a charge is a charge?! If I have been charged £35 for exceeding my overdraft limit this is more that it costs Lloyds in admin costs and time, which is the principal behind us claiming back these charges?

 

 

Secondly -

'I've noticed that you've referred to the unfair contracts terms act 1977 and the unfair terms in consumer contracts regulations but these don't apply to you as you're a business customer and these acts and regulations only apply to consumers.'

 

 

I was expecting this bit in a way, but seeing as one of the three accounts is a personal one it still has some relevance.

 

So, what next? Proceed as normal, wait another week then start the court claim?

 

Many thanks, Dave

 

 

Fishydave

 

STOP !!

 

You should read up on the issues concerning the differences in claiming on Business accounts compared to Personal accounts before going any further.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/68191-claiming-business-account-lets.html

 

Sorry, but I think it would benefit you greatly to read the whole thread. Make yourself a cuppa, and sit down.

 

When you submit your claims, do not cut corners by trying to lump them all together. Treat each account as a seperate claim.

 

Don't worry, you have not done any harm to your claims yet.

I would suggest you issue new seperate LBA's for each account, taking care to use the case law and format of letters most relevent to each account. ie; an LBA for your personal account using Personal Consumer law, and an LBA for each Business account using the law and reference most relevant to Business claims.

 

ABOVE ALL, DO NOT RUSH, DO NOT CUT CORNERS. READ, READ, READ !!

 

Best regards

 

Photoman

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...