Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ae - thanks for your interest.  It's quite overwhelming to keep reiterating the background.  I've lived through a lot and put a lot behind me.  There is one property - that has unresolved civil litigation.  It's been subject to lots of litigation - as explained (LH/FH).  I also explained the lender could've sold it immediately.  They chose not to.  The crux of the remaining litigation is focused on the steps they took and why I shouldn't be liable for their failures.  My counterclaim raises issues of criminality.  I'm very tired.  Exhausted with looking backwards.  The trial proceedings are at their end - I am now only trying to figure if I have an alternative angle by way of a separate complaint or claim v receiver AND how I can force a sale before the issue would be dealt with at trial.  (Aside: i'm still considering if I can complain v broker AND need to follow up with sra on former lawyer negligence) I'm considering Bazza's comment about fmv - this will present more transparency on the situation 
    • What is the £3500 debt based on, estimated or actual readings? You may have all been paying an amount each month by direct debit but that may not have covered your usage so you still owe a debt.  If you are joint tenants for the property, all five of you have joint and several liability for any debt owed so you alone can be pursued for the full amount or they can pursue all of you for the full amount.  You need to find out whether or not British Gas has billed you correctly and the amount claimed is correct. 
    • The charging order is a red herring. If the IVA fails because payments are stopped, the IVA practitioner can bankrupt the sister. Depending on the amount of equity in the property, if it's quite high, that's a very likely outcome. Advising the sister to just stop making payments is absolutely terrible advice.
    • Bazza - fair market value is definitely contentious.  Your comment has made me realise I must consider it in detail over the last few years alongside the steps lender/ receiver took. I've made a start
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

I need some advice, Ive been stupid! :(


brobins
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ahh well.. hindsight is a wonderfull thing!

 

So your saying they 'should' write the debt off but they may not and I should get a written confirmation from them just in case.. And if they havent totally written this off, can I request them to?

 

So I take it I am now all squared up with RBS, meaning that I dont owe them a bean and I am free to chase them up for any charges 'they' applied to the account 'before' Moorcroft bought the debt?

 

Again sorry for all these questions but I finally feel I am getting closure on this whole thing!! :)

 

To explain it in more detail...The person you spoke to would have to note on the systems that you have agreed a Full & Final and pass a bit of paper to their manager to 'credit' the account. This is not fool proof so I would definatley call them and ask for a settlement letter ( Its easily printed off just push a button literally) and hey presto ! Confirmation you have paid.

 

If it ever Does come back to haunt you you can provide this to experian, equifax etc and it will be enough to remove it. I would just give Moorcroft a week as it normally takes that long to update the system.

 

As for charges you are free to go for it!:D

Maxibon

 

 

Gonna take them for all I can and enjoy every second!:lol:

 

 

RBS Account 1- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 20/12/2006

RBS Account 2 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 20/12/2006

RBS Ac1- recvd S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 28/12/2006

Statements recvd Account 1 on 05/01/07

LBA issued for Account 1 on 06/01/07

7 days grace being given till 09/02/07

Still no Response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on Acc 2

Breach on acc 2 DPA request

N1 filed acc 2 28/02/07

Acknowledged 16/03/07

Defense submitted 30/03/07

 

If you need any advice re Moorcroft just ask!! :cool:

 

If I have been of any help and you think I deserve it!

Please click my scales to the left and if you wish leave a comment :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

To explain it in more detail...The person you spoke to would have to note on the systems that you have agreed a Full & Final and pass a bit of paper to their manager to 'credit' the account. This is not fool proof so I would definatley call them and ask for a settlement letter ( Its easily printed off just push a button literally) and hey presto ! Confirmation you have paid.

 

If it ever Does come back to haunt you you can provide this to experian, equifax etc and it will be enough to remove it. I would just give Moorcroft a week as it normally takes that long to update the system.

 

As for charges you are free to go for it!:D

 

Your spot on there mate!

 

I just rang back and spoke to them and they explained what will happen...

 

I will get a letter and recipt saying I have paid X amount and I that I STILL OWE £85.xx but then a week later I will get a rectified letter saying that it has been settled etc I will definitely keep my eye on this.!

 

Now my next (and hopfuly final question) is should I wait a week or so to obtain my credit file from Experian to see the status of this moorcroft thing too? or do it now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your spot on there mate!

 

I just rang back and spoke to them and they explained what will happen...

 

I will get a letter and recipt saying I have paid X amount and I that I STILL OWE £85.xx but then a week later I will get a rectified letter saying that it has been settled etc I will definitely keep my eye on this.!

 

Now my next (and hopfuly final question) is should I wait a week or so to obtain my credit file from Experian to see the status of this moorcroft thing too? or do it now?

 

 

Yeah I always used to get calls like this! When it comes to the experian File Moorcroft will say they Have NOTHING to do with updating the credit file but They must do! They always used to tell us to say ' we dont do it' But when I questioned it they never really gave me a straight answer.

 

I would give them a week or 2 to see if they update it if not they wont do it for you...they will say you need to speak to RBS to sort it out. It sounds right to me though as Moorcroft would only receive the debt ONCE it had defaulted so they in effect would not need to touch your file to show this and I think it would be the same for updating it too.

 

From experience I think it may be best to get your confirmation of payment letter and then check with experian and if its still showing see if RBS will update it or fax a copy to experian yourself?;)

 

If I have been of use give me a click on my scales to the left!! Ta

Maxibon

 

 

Gonna take them for all I can and enjoy every second!:lol:

 

 

RBS Account 1- S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 20/12/2006

RBS Account 2 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 20/12/2006

RBS Ac1- recvd S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 28/12/2006

Statements recvd Account 1 on 05/01/07

LBA issued for Account 1 on 06/01/07

7 days grace being given till 09/02/07

Still no Response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) on Acc 2

Breach on acc 2 DPA request

N1 filed acc 2 28/02/07

Acknowledged 16/03/07

Defense submitted 30/03/07

 

If you need any advice re Moorcroft just ask!! :cool:

 

If I have been of any help and you think I deserve it!

Please click my scales to the left and if you wish leave a comment :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now my next (and hopfuly final question) is should I wait a week or so to obtain my credit file from Experian to see the status of this moorcroft thing too? or do it now?

 

I would wait until you've got full confirmation from Moorcroft that they've done all they promised to do. Also I would get moving on the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request to RBS for your statement details so u can get to work on the charges - it may take them some time to action your request (there are templates in the library to help with this)

 

Remember if you find RBS have defaulted you then you will need to mention in your reclaim letters that you want this removing also as I said in my earlier post (dunno if you read it?)

 

Good luck with it all :)

links to my current claims ...

My claim - Yorkshire Bank Visa

chezt V RBS Mastercard

Chezt v RBS Joint Account

chezt v Abbey Credit Card

 

Settled ...

chezt V Duet Card/Creation Finance

chezt v's Studio Cards

chezt v's Littlewoods Catalogue

 

Next ...

Abbey Joint a/c & Single a/c

Barclaycard (Mine & Hubby's)

Anyone else I can think of ...! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...