Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing benefit overpayments


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6316 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wrote this letter in reply to a Demand for £1,853 over payment of housing benefit. Comments welcom

 

 

Housing benefit blunder so once again poor people on low incomes are subjected to the effects of beurocratic blunders with far reaching consequences for there all ready stretched finances

 

 

Should I have known that an over payment was made ?

You inform that you have made a mistake 23 months after the mistake was made

Am I psychic? No the onus was with you not me I trusted you with the information I supplied you. To make the correct calculations and decisions with the information you requested, to work out my housing benefit claim,

As this is the service that you offer and require me to use should I wish to claim housing or council tax benefit?

 

As I am a gardener and not employed by Powys county council, I would not know where to start when it comes to working out housing and council tax benefit, or working tax credit,

And where do you imagine I can get that amount of money from when the reason I claimed benefit was because of low earnings

 

I shall of course contact my MP raising this issue with him and endeavour to find out how many claims this involves or is this isolated mistake

with what I can only describe as a shoddy and totally inept service that treats people like this

 

I totally disagree with your letter suggesting that I should have been aware or able to somehow know, that an over payment had been made by you.

Please find attached DMA01

And in disputing this I also dispute that I should have to make a repayment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Izzy,

I found myself in a similar situation last year, they were asking for the payments back even though they were in receipt of all of the fact of my pay etc. I tried to resolve their mistake and made an offer of £5 per month. They asked for £10. I agreed and set up an agreement that this would be taken from future benefits. That was done then only last week they wrote to me sating that they had made a mistake and they owed me money.Thay are so bloody incompitant at the B A.I accepted the money and told them that I don't want to claim the benefit anymore.

I hope things go well for you and don't let them push you about!

 

Kind regards. happyolddog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Izzy,

 

If you have good grounds, there is a proper appeal procedure in place for overpayment of Housing Benefit. Their letter to you should explain your rights on all this..

 

i.e. 1. Appeal in writing against the overpayment and state why you should not be expected to pay it back.

 

If your appeal is turned down then the next stage is an appeal tribunal where an independant committee look at all the facts and then decide whether to find in your favour.

 

Did you receive info on this?

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Izzy -

 

I'm a housing benefits assessor myself, perhaps I can help?

 

The no. 1 rule for benefit claimants is - CHECK YOUR NOTIFICATIONS.

 

Whenever a decision is made, you will be notified of:

 

a. Your weekly entitlement and

b. The way your benefit has been calculated

 

Now although you could not be expected to know how the calculation works (it's not actually that difficult, I can explain the procedure if you like) the notifications should clearly state what figures the council use when assessing your income.

 

Now mistakes DO happen - regardless of what the public may think, benefits staff are not sipping tea all day, we are almost constantly overwhelmed by the flow of information, my office for example has one roughly one member of staff for every 500 claimants. Please remember that this is like a contract you are entering into, we try our best to reduce errors but in some respects they are inevitable. Thats why we ask you (and you will have been told this on your letters) to check our figures and tell us if they are wrong.

 

Your notification letters will have shown the exact figures we've used for your income, if you were earning £100 per week but your notifications said you were earning £50 per week then I'm afraid it's YOUR responsibility to check those notifications and tell the council immediately if our figures are incorrect. Thats the reason notification letters are sent. This is clearly a very important part of people's lives so it's not unreasonable to ask that people take at least some responsibility when benefits are concerned.

 

I hope you don't feel that I'm being overly antagonstic but writing to people like me and telling them that they're inept, morons etc. is not going to help matters.

 

If you could confirm the specifics of the case - eg. state what aspect of your circumstances the council got wrong - then perhaps I could help advise you better.

 

As another poster said, as long as you are still receiving housing benefit, the council will not demand that you pay back all the money straight away, they will normally deduct the money from your ongoing benefit payments. This can be anything between £5 per week and £20 per week, depending on your circumstances.

 

If you feel that the council are deducting too much you can ask that they lower the deduction amounts.

 

If you have stopped receiving benefits, contact the council's income management section to arrange a payment schedule.

 

If you can be more specific about the nature of the overpayment I could advise you better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...