Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wheelie bin madness


Kizan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We've got that now - fortnightly collection of 'general' waste, and weekly collection of recycleables, so the 'savings' aspect doesn't apply - the bin lorry still covers the same number of miles.

 

We've been doing this since May 2006, and to be hoest so much now goes in the weekly recycling (including cardboard, glass, tin, paper & plastic) we're hard pressed to even half fill our general bin fortnightly. I dislike the idea, but in practice, it's not been a problem. At Xmas, they even reinstated weekly collections of general waste, but not many felt it was needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like most council/government run, er, initiatives, the whole thing is a farce. It's not about actually doing something practical but more to do with meeting government/european targets - and we all know how efficient the E.U. policy makers are!

 

e.g. glass, tins and plastic all go in the same bin but have to be seperated later. Why? Only plastic containers like milk cartons are allowed, not other plastics even if they are marked recyclable. Why? Everything has to be washed out even though it is probably melted down later. Why? How much extra water is that wasting, not to mention more use of gas/electricity or both where people use hot water? Aren't areas in the south east still under drought conditions?

 

It's a classic case of being seen to be doing something but in real terms it's probably costing the country a fortune and having real little overall effect, when all they need to do is legislate against overpackaging of products.

 

For example, why does a 4-pack of baked beans need to be in a cardboard holder or plastic strapping? Is it too much trouble for people to pick up 4 cans? Would anybody really complain or even notice if the extra packaging was removed? I'm sure you all could name a hundred other examples. To hell with making packaging that is recycleable, just leave it out, we don't need it, and we certainly don't need the extra hassle and cost of getting rid of it, either on a personal level or as a nation. I have better things to do, so should the rest of the country!

 

I'm with you demon, bring back glass bottles and cut out the crap. We've lost the plot.

 

Incidentally our bins have tracking devices, previously they were covert until somebody discovered them, but the council say that these are to improve efficiency by telling them which route the binmen take when emptying bins so it can be studied to imporve efficiency. Yeah, right! You think they would have worked it out by now, the basic map of the town hasn't changed on the whole since waste collections began, you would think they had worked out the best route by now.

 

Oh, and apparently it helps them return bins to the owners if they are lost - isn't the serial number on the side sufficient to do that, e.g mine has an embossed serial number C14238534 - look it up on the database and bring it back to me or inform me if you find it, how hard can it be? Bolleaux. :-x

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remove the packing at the checkout..........that'd soon stop them tying everything in bleeding knots

 

Yes, that's happening more and more, and "refuse the bag". Makes me laugh how Tesco and the rest have this bag recycling policy and "green" clubcard points if you reuse a carrier bag, yet still put your stuff in a bag even if it's just a tin of beans or something!

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi im a recycler working for spelthorne council and demon i agree with you there my motto is "help us to help you" spelthorne does have a weekly rubbish collection although a lot of stuff that can be recycled still gets in with the rubbish i.e paper,cans,tins and glass bottles its not rocket science we posted calenders into every household just before xmas explaining what can and what cant be recycled but thats made no diferance in fact i found a lot of the calanders in the recycling bins hhhhmmm its all so simple rinse out tins to keep the smell away pack the recycling boxes correctly i.e make it easier for us so we are not ****ing off other drivers who think we should not be there put paper on bottom of bin then cans,tin and glass on top oh and noooo broken glass in bin yup it does happen loads lost count of the scars.many councils go about it in diferant ways some use hgv 2 lorrys and wheelie bins and you put it all in therebut we at spelthorne use 7.5 ton lorries with 6 stillages on back and sort it onto the lorry one last though please spare a thought for us we dont do one road on my rounds each route consists of 30+ roads

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason you are asked to rinse out tins etc is to cut down on cross contamination if i have say half a stillage of clean tins and i then put in a bin of dirty ones that have mold in them that stillage full is contaminated and of no use the steel industry would reject it plus when its melted down there would be a dirty film flotting on top

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everybody has sympathy I'm sure with the problems that come with your job, but the whole system is complete nonsense.

 

First of all, if the government want to do something serious about the issue, BRING IN LAWS WITH REGARD TO OVERPACKAGING!

 

We don't want it, we don't need it, many of us lead busy lifestyles and sorting out rubbish that we don't want in the first place is just another job to do.

 

I often wonder how much energy is expended in recycling the stuff, much of which isn't wanted or needed in the first place - including the calendars, circulars etc. We got a circular hand delivered by council staff reminding us to recycle (we have three bloody great wheelie bins outside the door, we're hardly likely to forget), next day came a questionnaire about the trading standards service, the day after that a circular about college courses etc. The govenment without a shadow of a doubt PRODUCES most of the waste through unnecceasry leaflets about just about everything! Walk into a hospital or council office, tax office, in fact any government office you care to name and there will be a choice of hundreds of leaflets about just about anything you care to name! WE DON'T NEED IT!

 

As for washing out the cans etc, although the reasons for this are understandable, how much water is being wasted by doing this? How much energy when the combi boiler fires up when you go to wash out that can? How much energy is expended in collecting it and recycling it all, not to mention manufacturing it in the first place, whether it be paper, plastic, cans, glass or whatever.

 

I say again, we don't want it, we certainly don't need it, STOP PRODUCING IT!

 

It's a complete farce, man.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason you are asked to rinse out tins etc is to cut down on cross contamination if i have say half a stillage of clean tins and i then put in a bin of dirty ones that have mold in them that stillage full is contaminated and of no use the steel industry would reject it plus when its melted down there would be a dirty film flotting on top

 

Incidentally I thought the main reason for melting it down was to burn off any impurities? EVERYTHING is contaminated from the moment it is produced, cans have glue on them from the labels that were stuck on them (probably still are), grease from fingerprints having been handled by who knows how many people with who knows what illnesses, and so on.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...