Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Aktiv Kapital Default Removal


app1es
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6318 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help!

 

I am experiencing problems with Aktiv Kapital and was beginning to think that there was very little I could do about it until I came across this site.

 

I held an account with First National Tricity Finance between 2000 and 2003 under an HP agreement. I wasn't always dead on time with my payments but was never more than 2 months late. In the last year or so of the agreement I was paying by DD and no payments were ever late. The DD payments stopped when I assumed the account was closed. A year later I was contacted by Westcot requesting £120 that I 'owed' First National. In a bit of a naive moment I promptly paid it.

 

Later in 2004 I was checking my credit files with Experian and Equifax to discover that First National AND Aktiv Kapital had recorded defaults against me. I quickly wrote to both companies to insist that this information was incorrect and explained that I could not default if I was unaware that I owed them money.

 

No reply from either company...

 

When checking my credit files again later that year I discovered ALL information from First National had been removed but the entry from AK still existed. I found out that AK and Wescot were linked and for the past two years have sent numerous letters to AK requesting that they remove their default. On one occasion I did manage to get through on the phone to their company to be told that First National would need to confirm with them that there was no default before they could remove it.

 

I have sent letters to first national and AK to continually request some cooperation but to no avail.

 

Should I be able to get this default removed?

Should AK have registered this default?

Were they allowed to?

 

I dont care about the money i just want negative information removed from my credit file.

 

Can anyone help advise me?

 

I would be really grateful of any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi App1es,

 

As you've probably read from the other posts about defaults, it's a hard process to initiate, but it can be done, there are some success stories around! (I think)

 

I'm currently trying to get a default removed from my credit file too, but

with HFC. Here's a link to my post.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hfc-household/42422-lees-hfc-household-bank.html

 

They've just received the letter today so I hope to hear back from them soon, I've already been fobbed off once!

 

Cheers,

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is more than likely that the £120 you paid in 2004 would have included

unlawful charges levied by First national and possibly by Westcott too.

 

If you read the FAQS on the forums first page, you will understand the thinking behind the actions taken to recover these unlawful charges. The

other benefit in discovering how much of the £120 is made up of charges,

is that the higher the figure, the less reason Aktiv have to list the £120 as

a default. In any event, as you no longer have an agreement with any of

the three companies, they have no valid mandate to process data about you.

 

To start the ball rolling, send an sar to First Credit and Westcott to find out

what the original debt was, and how much they both added to that amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm having a right royal runnaround with AK and Equifax - did a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) with AK and got all my details for an account from Comet and they have registered a default on my account from before I even had dealings with them. Now AK say that they remove the persons default whom they take over the account from and register it in their name - my argument is that they didn't include any of the necessary info for a default (original letter etc) with everything else from the SAR and also the fact that I had no dealings with them at that time (their own accounts show that my dealings commence some 6+ months after the default) so the information is inaccurate. Still having no joy but am sortof snowed under atm so not overly pursuing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...