Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MET CCTV PCN - Occupants Left Carpark - Appealed - Starbucks (closed) 346 SouthGate Park, Stansted, CM24 1PY


Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Help or advice needed please.

I just received a parking charge for Southgate Park.

I did not receive the original charge.

Therefore I am out of the 28 days to appeal.

now I have to pay the £100.

I called them to let them know that I had paid the airport charge, the lady told me to put it in writing.

as I was sending them a email, I googled them, then I realised that it was for Macdonald's, Starbucks.

I parked at Starbucks, as they were closed I walked over to Macdonald's etc.

 I haven't seen this site, I have just emailed them, telling them that I was the driver and what I did.

Am I screwed and do I now just need to pay the charge and put in down to experiences. or can I just ignore the letters ?

With much gratitude in advance 

CB

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 03rd March 2024

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] I did not received a NTK 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] YES

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here

7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] (346) Southgate Park, Stansted CM24 1PY

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS - POPLA

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here I received a parking charge Final Reminder today 15th April 2024 

 

2024-04-03 MET PCN final reminder for PCN 2024-03-03.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MET CCTV PCN - Occupants Left Carpark - Appealed - Starbucks (closed) 346 SouthGate Park, Stansted, CM24 1PY

The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024

The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).

Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above

-  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport"

Dear “To whom it may concern”

My name is ?? 
PCN:  ??
Veh Reg:

Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024

I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay. 

This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay.

I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam

My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport.

The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds)
There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules.

Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit. 

So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome..

With gratitude

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...