Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TFL Red Route Further evidence request. **PCN CANCELLED** still not happy mind!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I use a drop off shop for parcels on Stoke Newington High Street on a nearly daily basis.

I have won an appeal in the past for the exact same thing but this time I sent the full details of parcels dropped with the EVRI receipts.

However, yesterday I received a letter from TFL asking for further evidence.

My gripe is that the ticket was issued with no photographic evidence as the parking officer pulled up behind me as I was pulling away and the look of surprise was magic as I drove off.

Clearly he had taken my number but that is it.

I really do not want to give them any more evidence as I do not believe they cannot prove an offence was committed.

I had blue badge displayed but that is in screen and I did not include that as I never thought I would receive a ticket.

Do I have to provide the evidence as I feel I should get costs off them as they have issued a fine with no evidence in my view or am I wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean can prove an offence was committed surely?

did the evri receipts give times? so you were there and were obv parked by those being issued.

how did you win the appeal last ime.

also whilst you are here

can you please result this threads too?

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will dig the papers out but the previous appeal I won was parked on a red route bay for loading/unloading in the next bay up to the shop.

The camera never showed blue badge in screen and TFL rejected appeal first time as they never accepted Evri receipts even though dated and checkable on line.

Adjudication up held my appeal. 

I will find the judgement. But posting is another issue for me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just follow upload

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi, Sorry for delays but lot been happening and opened my eyes to care for the elderly but finally sorted.

My TFL ticket which I appealed was rejected and will try to load the rejection now. Which is to large and cannot do.

 will explain, original PCN had time as 08.38 to 08.38 and drove off before ticket could be issued.

Sent original receipts from drop off with dates. 2 receipts for 2 different parcels.

Received second letter asking for further proof which I had already supplied. 

Rejection letter received but this time time changed to 08.38 to 08.39

Plus this one stated that the issuing officer had approached me and spoke to me stating they were issuing a PCN but I drove off.

As this was a totally made up lie as no one approached me I appealed stating that fact and would be seeking costs on appeal.

I made an official complaint to the Metropolitan Police stating the officer had perverted the course of justice as no such incident took place and the statement was a made up lie.

I have to add the Police replied and were taking the complaint seriously.

I received a date for the Adjudication hearing.

But today I have received a letter from TFL stating they have received notification of my appeal against my PCN from the London Tribunals.

They have reviewed the issue of the PCN and the handling of my representation and decided the appeal to be non contested and cancel the PCN..

Could anyone tell me if I can take further action as I am far from happy that they lied then cancel the PCN like they are doing me a favour.   

The  PCN shows the only photos supplied and the photo of the vehicle has been altered to show far closer than it was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to TFL Red Route Further evidence request. **PCN CANCELLED** still not happy mind!

thread title update.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Formal complaints appear to be your only avenue here.

Once the authority have requested a DNC and the adjudicator has made a decision to accept that request, your appeal route is effectively ended.

However, you can apply for a review of the adjudicator's decision to accept the authority's DNC if you strongly believe there is an issue of law with their request (within the relevant regulations) that should be considered. This would not include a CEO lying as you have suggested, this would be a criminal matter and outside the adjudicator's jurisdiction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received the Adjudication notice allowed but no mention of costs which I applied for.

I have applied for a review as you suggested and ask what course I could follow on the criminal matter. 

I want to hold TFL on account of false representations.

Also the Metropolitan Police enquires are still on going as not heard otherwise from them.

Should I contact the officer involved to let him know TFL have cancelled the PCN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest update The officer dealing with my complaint has obtained some CCTV which he will review.

And the PCSO is currently on leave for 2 weeks but will be interviewed when they return.

Please if anyone knows how I can take TFL to Court please post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, tigeress289 said:

Please if anyone knows how I can take TFL to Court please post.

there is no need for that.

they will deal with it.

keep us informed 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...