Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Just saying hi to all!


Recommended Posts

Hi all!

Just joined and thought I would write a hello thread!

I'm currently going to be taking a business to court, I have noticed that I need to have 11 content pieces to privately message a user on here? 

Does it mean I need 11 posts before I can use this feature on this forum?

 

Cheers!

 

Roger-88

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep well said.

you would not know who to PM if all threads were operated by PM only......think about it.

 

dx

 

  • Thanks 1
  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies,

The only reason why I wanted to PM is that this particular business has had a bad track record with selling faulty goods.

I was hoping to reach out to these specific people who have posted on here in the past with same problems and dealings with this same business. 

I wanted to see if I could get statements confirming the conduct of the business I am taking to court to prove this business is conning people left right and centre when I stand in front of a judge.

That is if these people would like to give a statement, I'm only asking for help, not demanding by the way.

This business should not be allowed to be open in my opinion with all the horror stories I have found since I started searching on the Internet after my problem occurred. 

 

Cheers

Roger-88

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the threads are not a win by the poster in court against this mystery company, then they are of no use to YOU in court.

providing the judge with piles of 3statements backing up you claim will not win you the case, thats not how it works sadly.

so tell us the story before you get too close to any important deadlines, if you have already launched your claim....else i have a feeling you might go doing things that will hurt your case more than better it.

so come on..stop playing secret squirrel.

 

dx

 

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

The only reason why I have not disclosed anything of this fraudulent business is because I know this business is on this forum, so I am treading as light as I can currently.

Ironically if I could PM, then I'd be able to inform you with confidence who this business is without giving the business a head start. 

Cheers

Roger-88

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you have use the report button – but the your report doesn't include any information at all.

So not only does the forum not know – but the site team doesn't know either.

We don't play secret squirrel on this forum and as long as everything you say is honest and straight dealing – then they should be no problem. If you initially want to tell the site team then use the report button and in the report form tell us what it is that you are trying not to tell anybody else because you want to hide it but you're happy to let us know

So far there have been nine posts on this thread with you telling us that you have something to say but you don't want to say it and getting into a discussion about it but not actually revealing anything to anybody.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

We have received your report.

The company that you are dealing with is known to us. There was quite an extended problem with them three or four years ago.

There is no problem about running an open thread on the forum about this company. I'm going to close this thread.

If you want some help then please start a new thread and tell us your story.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want some help then please start a new thread and tell us a story.

We are unable to give you any help or advice unless you tell your story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...