Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • please dont use hosting sites. copied and attached as per our upload guide. dx  
    • Another update - just had another round of Text messages, Emails and letters. Physical  letters still going to the old address (forwarded by royal mail). All messages were exactly the same as the previous round with threats of CCj's, Attachment of Earnings, Warrant of Execution, Bankruptcy and Charging Order. Seems to be a 2 week pattern of 1 week letter, following week email - texts seem to be a bit more randon, but always over 10 days between each one.  Not sure if IDR are working diligently behind the scenes to recover monies from me,  or are just spamming me in the hope that i stick my head above the parapet
    • Here  (edited for personal information).  426MC505-claim-response.pdf 426MC505-claim-form-claimant-copy.pdf
    • Should the amount be the figure in the particular or the final amount with fees added
    • The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1PAPDC. 2. The Claimant claims £xxxxxx is owed under a regulated consumer credit account under reference xxxxxxxxx. I do not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant and the claimants solicitor by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request who are yet to fully comply. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unable to recall the precise details of the alleged agreement or any default notice served in breach of any defaulted payments. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied.The Defendant contends that no notice of assignment pursuant to s.136 of the Law of Property Act & s.82 A of the CCA1974 has ever been served by the Claimant as alleged or at all. 5. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence any cause of action and service of a Default Notice  pursuant to sec87(1) of the CCA1974; and (c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 6. After receiving this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 78 request for copies of any documents referred to within the Claimants' particulars to establish what the claim is for.  7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief Should the amount be the figure in the particulars or the final figure with the added fees
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OTA Scam Watch - @Opodo

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 276 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

OTAs (Online Travel Agents) - We are all tempted to use them, because they offer cheaper deals. But it is worth it? How many of them conduct an honest business, and how many use various tricks to scam money out of the unsuspecting customer?

Are the nickels and dimes you are saving worth the complete lack of customer service that you will undoubtedly encounter if anything goes wrong with your holiday plans? Are you even saving any nickels and dimes in the first place?

Today we take a deep dive into one of the leading OTAs in the UK, Opodo, and its many dubious practices



When getting redirected from google flights/kayak etc. Opodo's prices will display as cheaper than they actually are... because it is automatically assumed that you will opt in their "prime" subscription scheme. And subscriptions are evil,  as we know. As you naturally opt out, you will find that your price has now increased. This is still better than the horrible fate that will befall you shall you get yet another subscription that you don't really need.


Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album




Free seat selection is a thing of the past, and everybody knows it, right? So why not milk extra money from the customer whilst they don't suspect a thing!

Opodo charges you more than the airline would ever charge you, for the same seat. A whole lot more!

In this example, Opodo charges customers £10 more (or 100% more!!!) for the very same seat on the very same flight (Birmingham to Paris). Imagine you are a party of 4, corresponding from Paris to another final destination. Ka-ching, £160 extra, all for Opodo, for pushing a button on their computer.

It's pointless too. You can purchase your ticket on Opodo, and then log iAn to the airline portal and pay for your seat there, so there is actually zero incentive for you to pay the 100% more expensive price, unless you are simply oblivious to being taken advantage of.

It gets even worse. Opodo will charge you for seat reservation fees if you have a flex, business, or premium economy ticket, which grants you free seat selection. That's right. They will charge you top dollar for something that's free.



Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album

on Opodo: £20.31


Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album

on Air France: £10.20




Luggage follows a similar pattern. Opodo will charge customers a lot more for their luggage than the airline. In this example (Birmingham to Paris), Opodo charges £16 more or 61% extra.


Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album

£41.99 per bag with Opodo



Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album

£25.60 direct with Airline


(part I)

Link to post
Share on other sites


When shopping at Opodo, no matter what ticket you are buying, or when, you will always get this anxiogenic popup that tells you the price is about to go up, as soon as you tab out.

Guess what? I am browsing for a ticket in May 2024. The price is not likely to go up anytime soon, and will probably go down. However this has the crafty effect to induce anxiety in shoppers who have the smart idea of double checking other websites to make sure their purchase is well informed.



Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album



Why provide Customer Support for free, when you can charge customers for things that you are legally obliged to provide? 

Opodo provides "Standard" support for £6.88 which includes some things which should definitely be free such as "confirmation on demand", as well as some potentially useful things like "alerts via SMS" (but at this price....)

The "Premium" support option at £15.48 takes the cake with "Priority refund". When you know that EC261 commands that passengers be refunded within 7 days, you really are taking the mickey when you're proposing that customers pay to guarantee that those legal obligations are fulfilled.



Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album





Baggage tracking & Compensation service

£9 to charge you for what the airline is already obliged to do for free. This has the benefit of offering £900 if your bagage is delayed for more than 3 days, but know that 99% of lost baggage is delivered within that time frame, and that the airline already owes you up to £1200 if it is lost forever.


Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album


Flight Updates and Covid restrictions via SMS

Even if just £2.90 it's still a joke... You can get flight updates for free on your airline app, and covid restrictions are free to browse anytime using one of those two websites:

TravelDoc Passenger View - TravelDoc.Website

IATA - Personalised Passport, Visa & Health travel documentation advice (iatatravelcentre.com)



Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album


(part 2)

Link to post
Share on other sites


(I am still using our Birmingham-Paris flight as an example)

This one is a bit harder to judge. Opodo proposes that you pay £27 extra for Flexible booking (change without fee), or £91 extra for "super flexible" booking. (change without fee or refund with fee)

Those options, unlike all the other crap we've covered so far, actually have their uses. Especially so if you think your plans might not go ahead,and/or you don't have a good travel insurance.

There are some serious caveats with each option, which I will list below, so I would only recommend you buy them after thoroughly double checking. 

In addition, it seems that you can buy the very same options on page 2, at a lower price, without the "high priority assistance". This is a much better price.


£27 or £11.37 - Change without a fee

Rather than a flexible arrangement with the airline, this seems to be an insurance of sorts. Opodo will refund you the price of your original ticket in full, and then you have to pay for the new ticket in full, as priced on Opodo.
When you are travelling on "light" (or "inflexible") fares, this can be quite attractive as the airline itself would charge you £85 (in our Air France example) to change your ticket. However this assumes that Opodo wouldn't pass on the £85 cost onto you, so it's worth double checking the full terms and conditions with them.

In our earlier examplee, if you were to purchase a "changeable without a fee" directly with the airline, it would cost you £54 instead. You would get free luggage on top. 

In both cases (buying with Opodo, or buying with airline) it's a bit of a lottery as you will have to pay top dollar if the prices have gone up for your selected dates.



£91 or £16.50 - Refund with a hidden fee

Pay up front and your ticket will be refundable. You have until 24 hours befor the flight. If you read the T&Cs you only get 80% of your money back, which is fairly misleading of Opodo to word it as "Refundable ticket". Still, at £16.50 only it's hard to fault.

If you bought this directly with the airline it would cost you £166 extra. You would get free luggage, free seat selection with extra legroom, fast track security, priority check-in and boarding. Your ticket would be 100% refundable up to 30 minutes before the flight.



Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album

Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album

Image image in OTA Scam - Opodo album


(part 3 and final part)

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Does Opodo use scammy and quite frankly a little bit disgusting tricks to overcharge customers? Absolutely
  • Should you avoid using them entirely? Not necessarily. If Opodo offer the best value for money, once you've removed the subscription discount and all the other hidden fees, then by all means, go for it.
    • You should absolutely avoid any ancillary services they propose like seat selection, luggage, or insurance, as you are bound to find cheaper elsewhere.
    • You should be confident that you are able to solve your own problems if the need arises, as their "customer service" is priced extortionately.
    • Flexible options might be worth buying, but only if you are travelling on a hard dicount/light ticket
  • Are they the only one? Certainly not. I didn't mean to single them out, but I had the opportunity of trying to buy a ticket with them today so it was a good time to expose all these hidden fees and charges they try and take. Be aware that many other OTAs use the same tactics. Some of them might actually price services reasonably, but care is due when browsing. As a rule of thumb buying with airline is always safe, unless you know exactly what you are paying for and are happy to use an OTA. You can sometimes get good discounts this way.


I am hoping that this guide will be helpful to some, and perhaps after we see some of these shady practices exposed, companies will think twice about their pricing strategies! If you enjoyed it, I might investigate a few other TAs when I get the chance.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...