Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parcel2go letter before court action sent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Grand living all,

I hope this is the right place to post about our loss of business because of parcl2go

29 days ago, I sent a letter before court to the complaints team at Parcel2go.com.

In May 2023, as a business, I sent a parcel to another business customer in Germany incl insurance. The customer tried our services to decide if they wanted to do further long-term business with our company. Great opportunity it was for us but that opportunity got lost when parcel2go and its partners failed to deliver the good to the business.

The chosen service was the fastest we paid in order for the customer to receive the order quick. We did everything in our power to please that business customer, however, when it came to parcel2go to do their bit, they failed costing us long-term business opportunity.

Parcel2go and its partners  (the delivery courier service) claimed having contacted the German buyer as well as us the sender to inform them and to inform us that their package was awaiting custom clearance. The buyer confirms having received no contact from parcel2go and its partners. We also have not been contacted by parcel2go.

We checked all emails, spam and nothing from parcel2go informing us of anything. Parcel2go provided a picture of a statement that stated 'recipient contacted for custom clearance. The buyer asked to be provided with proof of letter or email content or date of phone call as they confirmed that they never received any correspondence from the courier service or parcel2go.

Parcel2go said they cannot provide content of the letter/email because of GDPR. We also asked parcel2go to provide us with the letter/email content showing that indeed they contacted us too.  Both the sender (us) and the recipient made phone calls, live chatted and emailed parcel2go asking about the whereabouts of the package and proof of letter and emaiil content. The tracking number was also misleading us.

We do not believe that we (the sender) and the buyer were ever contacted. Moreover, whilst the package was in Germany sitting there according to the tracking number, we made various live-chats / sent various emails to parcel2go asking them not to return the package to the sender but to deliver it.  After a few weeks,, the package was returned to us

 

Parcel2go have replied to our letter before court with the following:

Good Afternoon ..........

Should you wish to take this further this is your own prerogative however please ensure they are aware that you agreed to our terms and conditions prior to making payment, and you have been advised correctly on this matter. 

https://www.parcel2go.com/terms-and-conditions

8.10 Refunds will not be offered for consequential loss.

8.13 If a Consignment is Returned to Sender, we shall not be liable to you under any circumstances for any loss caused by us. 

This will ensure you are providing the correct advice should you feel grounds to escalate. 

 

What are your thoughts? Any help would be much appreciated, thank you

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you got the parcel back so why are you going after P2G?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also please can you post up the letter of claim which you sent – in PDF format.

You should understand that the loss of business sum which you are trying to claim is not recoverable. You would actually have to lose the parcel and you would be able to recover for that declared value – probably nothing more than that.

Post up the letter of claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...