Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ebay seller chargeback advice - Buyer lost and demands money


gphandley

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

I sold an electrical item on ebay that was brand new in the wrapping, and came with a manufacturer 3 year warranty. As part of the warranty claim the item would have to be returned to America, as it is an American item. I got confirmation from the manufacturer that the warranty is valid, before i sold a few of these items.

 

Everything was ok, and then i received a dispute case the buyer opened with paypal, item not as described, 72 days after the purchase date

 

Cutting a long story short i uploaded product photos, serial numbers, parcel weights, postage labels, and mentioned the 3 year warranty and I won the case.

 

In between him opening the case, and the final decision the buyer just send the item back with no prior communication and then a day or so later the case was found in my favour, the buyer is now demanding his money back by ebay message

 

Ebay online chat said paypal found the case in my favour and no action is required, not to refund, and not to send the item back. They said his bank has decided that and no action is required by me, and ebay cannot intervene.

 

What do i do, and where do i stand please??

 

All through this i would say the buyer has been short and not co-operative. I received not communication just straight to a chargeback, then when i asked what the reason was he replied it had stopped working and apologised, After pointing him in the direction of the manufacturer and all the warranty information he needed, he said his contract is with me, not the manufacturer so he will let paypal sort it out, then after saying that he returned the item to me without warning or approval and before a final decision had been made, and now he demands his money back.

 

The item came with a full 3 year no quibble warranty but i guess he does not want to pay return postage to America so has gone down the chargeback route. The warranty is shown in the photos on the product box.

 

Any advise please?

 

Thanks

 

 

Edited by gphandley
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • gphandley changed the title to Ebay seller chargeback advice - Buyer lost and demands money

When you say "chargeback" are you saying (1) that the buyer has raised a formal chargeback claim with his bank to reverse the transaction (2) or are you just using the term as shorthand to say that he's asking you to pay him back?

 

1 hour ago, gphandley said:

... As part of the warranty claim the item would have to be returned to America, as it is an American item. I got confirmation from the manufacturer that the warranty is valid, before i sold a few of these items...

 

 

Is this a private sale?  You aren't a trader?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes correct,

(1) He went to his bank and raised a formal chargeback and said it was not as described,

 

ebay then gave me the option to challenge the chargeback with his bank, or accept and refund him straight away.

 

After the chargeback was closed in my favour he is asking for his money back via ebay message.

 

Private seller 

 

 

Thanks

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, gphandley said:

Ebay online chat said paypal found the case in my favour and no action is required, not to refund, and not to send the item back. They said his bank has decided that and no action is required by me, and ebay cannot intervene.

 

id leave it there, tough on him 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I understand that you have sold an electrical item to somebody on eBay and that after about 2 months or so it ceased to work .

The first question that comes to my mind is whether you sold this as a trader in order to make profit or you were simply having a clear out of your personal items.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is going to be up to your conscience.

 

Although you are registered as a private seller with eBay, if you are selling multiples of these items and doing it for profit, then you are effectively a trader and you are bound by the rules contained in the consumer rights act 2015.

 

Trading doesn't necessarily mean that this is your sole activity. You could be trading items in your spare time for some extra money.

 

eBay rules about registering people as private sellers are slack, facile and have no particular legal status.

 

This means that the item you have sold must be of satisfactory quality and remain in that condition for a reasonable period of time.

 

If your purchaser came to this forum and asked for help, we would advise him to claim against you and I am pretty certain that he would win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...