Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Substantial Reduction in car NCD


Ptarmigan57

Recommended Posts

When I renewed my policy with QuoteMeHappy in August 2022, I declared a claim with a different vehicle, not insured by Quotemehappy.

I also queried what NCD I would be entitled to on the (then current) policy ending August 2022. QMH confirmed it would be 7 years.

When I queried the premium on the new policy, that had reduced substantially in cost, I was advised that the previous claim with a different vehicle, not insured by Quotemehappy, had been taken into account.

I have just (April 2023) cancelled the renewed policy with QMH, as I sold the vehicle, and do not have a replacement. 

The NCD that QMH provided showed only 1 year of NCD. 

I queried this reduction. QMH have confirmed that because of the accident I had with another vehicle, not insured by Quotemehappy, and prior to the start of the latest policy my NCD was reduced by 6 years (I did not have protected NCD).

I haven't been in this position before, is this level of reduction normal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally you would lose 2 years.   And it would be 2 years off the normal max NCD that is used for the industry NCD proof system which is typically 5 year.  So I would think you should still be entitled to 3 years NCD

 

This is based on my knowledge of the NCD system and how claims affect NCD, from working in Insurance from many years ago. I don't think the system has changed that much,  where one claim would reduce NCD to only 1 year, when the Insurers previously told you that you would be given 7 years NCD.

 

Sounds like the Insurers have made an error, so definitely raise a complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, much appreciated.

 

I have asked them to confirm they have a mistake, and they have restated their position. I raised a complaint, and have an email that represents a "deadlock communication" so my thinking is to go to the Ombudsman.

 

Apart from the 6 years reduction, what took me by surprise was that a claim on a different vehicle, with a different insurer, could affect this NCD.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience in the industry was a while ago now but what you describe was definitely not how it worked in the past. A no CLAIMS bonus should mean no claims under that insurer's policy.

 

Otherwise that insurer hasn't had a claim under their policy but are still claiming the right to reduce the NCB.

 

Sounds all wrong to me.

 

The policy wording is key thing. What does the NCB clause in the policy actually say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if they have rejected complaint, go to the FOS.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
An update on this.
 
After a further 4 attempts to get Quotemehappy to listen, I finally received a response that confirmed that their previous position was incorrect. There should have been no reduction in my NCD due to a claim on another vehicle with another insurer.
 
All they have offered is a correct NCD which I now have received. I have requested compensation, and will see how that goes, not holding my breath.
 
In parallel I did raise a case with the FOS.
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...