Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Erudio deferral delays intentional? Not responding


Jhgf
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 709 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

How long did it take for them to process your deferment paperwork?

Erudio not processing deferral paperwork on time - **RESOLVED ERUDIO ADMITTED MISTAKE** - Student loans/SLC - Consumer Action Group

I’m still waiting for mine.

Account showing arrears.

Should have deferred me on 19 May.

I submitted my paperwork electronically via portal on 5 April.  

Not taken anything yet, but I have a new collection date of 10 June. 

any answers appreciated 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I’m still waiting for them to process my deferment paperwork. 

Account showing arrears.

Should have deferred me on 19 May.

 

I submitted my paperwork electronically  via portal on 5 April.  

Not taken anything yet, but I have a new collection date of 10 June. 

 

any answers appreciated .

 

Curious that this is happening on 25th anniversary of first loan.

Never previously had problems deferring.

I’m well below the threshold. 

Edited by dx100uk
block of text spaced to paragraphs
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio deferral delays intentional? Not responding

Thanks for replying.

All details are on the portal.

Completed deferment form, bank and contact details etc.

 I uploaded a P60 as evidence after filling in deferment form via portal. .

should have everything they need. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, and it’s clearly evident in online portal as I said and evident in my bank under direct debits ( although not currently active)

Edited by Jhgf
Link to post
Share on other sites

They haven’t taken any money yet, despite the arrears showing.

Cancelling my DD is not advisable.

That will just muddy the issue.

I’d rather let them take it and than deal with them, rather than putting myself in default ( whether it’s due to their oversight or not).

Thanks,

but I think I’ll try and contact directly. and then ombudsman

Link to post
Share on other sites

My deferment is on record with their portal.

I’ve received no reply.

I have a chain of evidence.

Any  payment ( if indeed it is taken….it hasn’t been yet) will be unlawful.

As I’ve said they’ve taken no money and although they’ve detailed arrears the next contractual amount to be taken on 10/06 is still currently 0.0 pounds.

I’m guessing delays are causing some bottleneck with paper work.  

As I understand it you are obliged to provide DD details?  

Mine have not changed since original loan.

I’m not going to cancel DD at this point.

I’ll prove the error is theirs.

Easy in my case, with a robust volume of evidence.  

As I said will not muddy waters at this point until I’ve heard back vis a vis deferment.

They’re not going to nullify my 25 year write off.  

But thanks again for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may have given permission at some point.  🤷‍♂️

Erudio took over some time ago now and I’ve had a fair bit of correspondence from them..

Either way it won’t really resolve this current issue. 

Deferment and my right to defer will still have to be dealt with.

I’ve had no problems up to this point.

I think better to deal as is rather than cancel DD ( rightly or not) and give them reasons to imply I deliberately opted for default.

Plus I can’t be asked to deal with debt collectors ( rightly or not appointed ) turning up like a bad penny trying to squeeze me for money I don’t owe them.

I’d rather deal with it, even if it is on their terms.

I think The clarity of their wrong doing is more easily exposed this way.

But again, thanks for taking the time to reply. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers,

if they don’t play ball perhaps I’ll cancel DD.

Out a few hundred quid.

Same position.

Used ombudsman ( free) lots of times for insurance companies, contractors etc.

Won each time.

I’m all good here 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

Went down the old complaint route.

They’re legally obliged ( FSA) to resolve it within three days or provide you with written confirmation by post.

If not resolved after certain amount  of time you can avail yourself of Ombudsman.

They’re also legally obliged to retain the information you provided to them.

A sternly worded but polite complaint outlining my situation seems to have done the trick.

Two business days later, account deferred and arrears removed. Roll on September. 25 year anniversary.

have a good one 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops , not sure what I did there. Not to worry. All good. 

They didn’t help directly.  

It’s just Erudio rules of conduct are governed by the FCA and they are duty bound to reply to complaints within three days.

advisable to use their complaint procedures rather than emailing their customer service.

Become a pain in their ass and ( assuming you occupy a reasonable position) you’ll more likely get what you want.

Well, it worked for me. 😁

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...