Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
    • Thanks for coming back to us. There are no guarantees - but remember that so far MET have not had the guts to put even a single case before a judge.  Not once. Yours is one of seven court cases. Three ongoing like yours. In two MET bottled it as Witness Statement stage approached. In one the allocating judge decided their Particulars of Claim were rubbish and threw the case in the bin. Just the one victory by MET by default when the motorist stupidly didn't file a defence. So there is every chance that MET will throw in the towel in your case too if you stand firm. Please keep us informed of what is happening. Regarding being abroad, that is no reason for things going wrong, you can request an on-line hearing and we've had several cases where the PPC gave up when the motorist moved abroad. But please keep us in the loop.
    • No, I think you're fine with the exhibits you've prepared. Exhibit 1 - photos Exhibit 2 - para 107 of Beavis Exhibit 3 - CPR request Exhibit 4 - Excel v Wilkinson
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Synaptyx Vs Alliance and Leicester


synaptyx
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just posted my SAR with a cheque for £10. I looked at this a few months ago, but didn't do anything about it. I am so glad I found this site, the amount of useful information is staggering. When I get my money, I'm going to restore my VW bus. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the site,

:p

 

You've definately taken the first step into claiming back what's rightfully yours.

 

Spend time reading the FAQ's and the Step by Step guide as this will stop you making mistakes along the way. Use the letters and spreadsheets in the Templates Library as these have all been tried and tested in successful claims. Read as many threads as you can especially ones that relate to your bank. This is a SELF HELP site and won’t do the work involved for you. However, everything you need is on here somewhere.

 

Don't be afraid to ask any questions, no matter how stupid they may seem, but please remember that any advice that you receive is normally based on experience only and that you should seek expert advice if required.

 

All the best in your claim!! :wink:

 

 

Useful links to help with your claim

 

FAQ’s

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

 

Letter Templates

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/

 

Interest Spreadsheet

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-6-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

 

Court N1 form

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

 

Mcol Particulars of Claim

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html

  • Haha 2

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all!

 

This is the letter I received today from A&L

Thank you for contacting us regarding your account.

I have noted your comments that you believe the charges that have been raised on your account to be unfair, please be assured our charges are reasonable and are competitive with the charges made by other financial organisations.

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has commented that they consider the level of late payment charges to be unfair, however they were actually referring to late payment fees for credit card payments, which are quite distinct from a bank’s charges on current accounts.

As yet, the OFT have not entered into any discussions with the banking industry regarding current accounts. However, should that position change in the future, then Alliance & Leicester will participate as appropriate.

Oiven the above, I cannot accept you have been unfairly charged as you suggest. I regret, therefore, that I am unable to agree to your request for a refund of charges on this occasion.

I am sorry if you are disappointed with my response, but as the charges have been raised correctly in line with the terms and conditions of your account, they must stand.

Anybody tell me if they got the same letter? Next step LBA! :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Your reply before you sent the L.B.A.was nearly word for word like the one i recieved but they have offered a "goodwill"payment of £25.00.

Which of course i will e-mail back thanking them in part payment and not accepting the "conditions"they quote.

Keep plugging with the l.b.a. stuff i think your next step is to file a "moneyclaim"as you have given them the"28"days.

Check the library/Threads to makesure.

Lancsman.

P.s.Suppose i should start a thread as ive "started"on them

john r

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Okay, it's been a month since I've done anything - work has kept me pretty busy. Now I need some help.

These are my calculations:

                                                       Days since
 In respect of                   Amount  Date incurred offence Interest
 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge    7.00   05/12/2000    2254    £3.41       
 Paid Item Charge                25.00   18/10/2003    1207    £6.53       
 Paid Item Charge                25.00   27/10/2004    832     £4.50       
 Paid Item Charge                25.00   13/01/2006    389     £2.10       
 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge   25.00   06/02/2006    365     £1.98       
 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge   25.00   06/02/2006    365     £1.98       
 Paid Item Charge                25.00   13/06/2006    238     £1.29       
 Paid Item Charge                25.00   14/06/2006    237     £1.28       
 Failed Cheque Charge            34.00   15/06/2006    236     £1.74       
 Paid Item Charge                25.00   15/06/2006    236     £1.28       
 Failed Direct Debit Charge      34.00   19/06/2006    232     £1.71       
 Paid Item Charge                25.00   20/06/2006    231     £1.25       
 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge   25.00   06/07/2006    215     £1.16       
 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge   25.00   06/07/2006    215     £1.16       
 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge   25.00   05/08/2006    185     £1.00       
 Paid Item Charge                25.00   28/11/2006    70      £0.38       
 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge   25.00   21/12/2006    47      £0.25       

Total Charges: £425.00   Total Interest: £33.00       

TOTAL CLAIMED AT DATE OF SERVICE: £458.00       

JUDICIAL INTEREST AT CURRENT RATE OF 8%: £8.73

TOTAL CLAIMED AT DATE OF JUDGEMENT OR PAYMENT: £466.74

I'm a bit confused by a section in the court claim:

c) The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year, from [date when the money became owed to you] to [the date you are issuing the claim] of £ [amount] and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of [enter the daily rate of interest]
Can somebody please unravel this one for me? I'm really lost at this point.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Synaptyx,

 

I'm at the same stage as you, i'm off down the court tomorrow to file my claim.

 

My spreadsheet looks just like yours! How i've interpretted it is that the 'Interest' column on the right hand size IS the 8% judicial interest you should add, and not the overdraft interest - as far as i'm aware if you are working out the overdraft interest you have to use a different spreadsheet. I'm not bothering with the overdraft interest for mine as my claim is quite small (£375) compared to some and i'm sure the interest would be too as i was generally only over my limit for a day or two.

 

I would double check on the FAQ's but i think then that your £33 is the Judicial 8%. Thats how i'm doing mine anyway...but i'm quite new to this and will probably be proved wrong :confused:

 

Rogue

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...