Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Theres speculation on whether the magazine was Womens Weekly or Boys own 😀   ... probably a classic first edition of boys own - based on it costing $130k :lol  
    • You have five days yet to respect the WS deadline which is next Wednesday.  As others have said,  you can e-mail the court their copy.  That gives you the whole weekend to get the WS prepared.  Personally I'd post UKPC's theirs by 2nd class post (all they are worth) on Wednesday too, the court won't look badly on a short delay from a Litigant-in-Person. But WS draft time!    
    • You need to start drafting your WS.  I would suggest as sections - Sequence of Events - a brief description of how you came to get the invoice. Permission from Landowner - self-explanatory.  You will have to include this as it is in your defence.  However, be aware that your argument is very weak and indeed harms your case.  A person with no connection to the car park said you could park there - that is no different from saying that someone you met in the local pub said you could park there.  Anyway, get the site manager's WS.  Obviously this weak point could morph into a winner if you could get a WS from the landowner. Prohibition - you have this virtually word for word in the other WS. No locus standi - UKPC are not the landlord, they only administer the car park, they have no right to sue you (however the fact you never asked by CPR to see their contract with the landowner makes this a very weak point too). Double Recovery - again in the other WS.
    • And don't be worrying too much about being a day or two late with your WS. As a litigant in person, you'll be given a little leeway. Take time to post up your WS here  for the team to take a look. It'll give time to get your site manager's statement as an exhibit. Also, I understand you haven't got their WS yet? It could give you time to see theirs first if they send it. Do they have your email address? If so they could play dirty and send it the night before the hearing!
    • Topic moved to the Financial Legal Issues in view of the claim for,. Please read the following and copy and paste your responses back here for further advice.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Horizon PCN for overstaying in Town Centre Car Park - Asda Stafford


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 274 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Got another pesky invoice.  I assume guidance is to ignore as with the other one (bad week for me apparently).

 

If you'd like any other info, please let me know.

 

 

1 Date of the infringement 03/03/2022

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 11/03/2022

 

3 Date received 13/03/2022 
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? No I don't believe it does
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes, entrance and exit of the carpark.
 

6 Have you appealed? No - done nothing yet.
 

Have you had a response? n/a
 

7 Who is the parking company? Horizon Parking

 

8. Where exactly Asda Stafford
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS - POPLA

 

2022_04_07 14_40 Office Lens.pdf

Edited by darrenham
Wrong attachment
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

To be fair, I've read the link now and it refers to speaking to the manager of the store not writing a letter, I'd need to make a special trip for this.

 

Writing a letter would be ill-advised no?  You'd need to admit somewhere to being the driver of the vehicle if you're telling them you were a genuine customer?  Or do you just use creative writing to never confirm the driver bit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tried to be as non-committal as possible.  Thoughts?  Don't want to mention anything that they could possibly prove false.

 

To the Manager,

RE: Parking Charge Notice, Vehicle Reg XXXXXX

 

As a passenger in vehicle XXXXXX, I was dropped at your store on 3rd March 2022 to do some shopping, but have since been issued with a Parking Charge Notice for parking in your carpark. 

 

As a regular and loyal ASDA customer I’m shocked to have received this charge for buying my weekly groceries.

 

Could you possibly speak to Horizon Parking and ask them to drop this?  I’ve never been charged before for using an Asda carpark.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

No, I've had no response to my email, but I've also received no follow up from the fleecers, so maybe they've cancelled and not told me.

 

I'll follow up on the receipt of the next letter.  Scratch that, I've sent another mail laying it on thick about the cost of living.

Edited by darrenham
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...