Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

@evri - empty box for Samsung S21 Phone - court claim issues *** Settlement pre hearing***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 473 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you are going to make a claim then probably the most effective thing to do is to claim against EVRi for the non-delivery/stolen item – but of course it will require some evidence.
There seems to be no dispute that your parcel was delivered to the correct address and the question is whether the parcel was tampered with and whether in fact it was empty.
Is it possible for you to get any photographs of the package from your purchaser?

Did you purchase the so-called insurance from EVRi?
Have you approached EVRi about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. This is certainly stuff that we have heard before and I suggest that you begin by looking around for stories of the same kind of thing happening – parcels arriving at their destination empty.
You may find some stuff in the press as well. Try to get yourself a good collection – several instances of this happening by way of evidence.

If this goes to court then you will have to do convince the judge that it is more likely than not that what you are saying is what actually happened. This is not such a heavy burden as a criminal burden which is "beyond reasonable doubt".
In civil cases, the standard of proof is simply – more likely than not – which probably ought to mean that it is 75% likely that what you say did happen.

If you can get a statement from the purchaser as well then this will help a lot.

Begin by making a complaint to EVRi about it. Tell them that you want reimbursement. Don't set any deadlines but if you don't hear anything after about 10 days or so then come back here and let us know.

In the meantime decide whether or not you are prepared to take this to court.

Have a look at the EVRi stories on this sub- forum so that you can understand the route.
I expect EVRi will defend on two issues – that you have insufficient evidence to prove that what you're saying is true and that in any event you didn't ensure the parcel.

The insurance argument is dead in the water – but read up on this sub- forum about why the insurance requirement is unfair and unenforceable.

And as I said, understand enough about it and your possible losses in terms of court fees that you are prepared to go ahead and sue them for your reimbursement.
Don't imagine that they will simply pay you out without court papers having been issued – and if they consider that you don't have sufficient evidence that the parcel was delivered empty, then there is quite a good chance that they would simply go to court.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You say that you are waiting for a response to a claim form .

Does this mean that you have issued a court claim?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably about time to send a letter of claim in that case.

I don't think there's anything you can do about eBay

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter is fine. Brief and to the point.

I suggest that you send it as is

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you need to include your contact details so they can get back to you – although don't hold your breath that it will be anything interesting.

In terms of email or post – I have no idea. Just get it to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Send them a letter of claim and prepare to take action in 14 days.

 

Post a draft of your letter of claim here and also your eventual particulars claim

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see a copy of their response which you say you have posted – but it's all predictable anyway.

Yes, issue your claim that please post a draft of your particulars here first

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to post it again because that last one doesn't work.

Next time you upload something please will you check that it works correctly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

The defendant in this case is EVRi Parcelnet Limited trading as EVRI.
The claimant used the defendant's courier service to deliver a mobile phone value – £440 to a
UK address. Reference number xxxxx.
The defendant breached the contract by damaging the parcel and losing the item.  The
defendant photographed the damaged parcel at the time of delivery on 18th February 2022.
The defendant refuses to reimburse the claimant to the full value of item.
The defendant's requirement that they must be made aware of an issue within 28 days of their
service against the defendant’s own negligence or the criminality of its employees is unfair
within the meaning of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and is designed to deprive their customers of their statutory rights and therefore unenforceable.
The claimant seeks the value of the item of £440 plus delivery fee of £9.50, plus interest
pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts act 1984.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Post up the defence in PDF format when you receive it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Firstly I don't know what you are referring to when you start referring to a "criminal court".

Secondly, hang tight. They never miss a deadline but if something exceptional happens and they don't file a defence on time then it is up to you to go to your money claim account and to request judgement immediately. Don't let a minute pass after the expiry of the deadline if you have an receive the defence.

If you apply the judgement then you won't need any photos or anything else at all.

However, it seems to me that you haven't done your reading of the stories on this sub- forum. If you had then you would know that they always file at the last moment and you would then know that the next step would be to post up the defence in PDF format and then to wait for the directions questionnaire.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

They say that when you sent the item, you declared the value at only £20.

We haven't heard about this before. What would you like to say about it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do wish you wouldn't talk gobbledygook all the time. You aren't in a court room here and even if you were, you would have to explain things in a way that everybody would understand.

The basic question is – was the value of the item correctly declared? In their defence they very clearly say that you declared the item at £20

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as they don't have evidence that you declare the value of £20 then you are fine. However, if they do then your chances of success are probably remote.

You will certainly have to rebut what they say in the defence. I don't think I've seen a defence worded in that way. That will have to be at the top of your witness statement/skeleton argument.

They will also emphasise that point in the mediation proceedings. Did you take any screenshots of the booking and the value et cetera?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Ok. Make sure that you are familiar with all of the likely arguments and be prepared to stand your ground to the very last. Penny .

Making very clear that if they don't want to settle your claim in full then you are happy to go to court .

 

Be aware that you may come undo pressure from the mediator to compromise. You should tell the mediator that you consider that they are acting out of turn as they are simply there to carry messages for one side to the other

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...