Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Backdoor CCJ VCS PCN - stopping in a bus stop (marked with red line) - Southend airport


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes, we know your story (or most of it) from your thread.

 

You have a choice.  Pay £750 before 18 March, no CCJ, matter closed.  Or pay £270 for the set aside, get rid of the CCJ, then battle VCS in court.  Your choice.

 

You ask about the odds of a set aside being granted.  I would say about 95%.  I've never known a Cagger who has applied for a set aside to be refused.

 

However, you have been going about this case all the wrong way.  You ask for information from lots of different sources, mix the advice up, and never get the legal strategy right.  You need to stick to one source, either here or another site.  For example we specifically said not to appeal - yet you appealed.  We underlined the importance of replying to a Letter of Claim, yet presumably you didn't do so (we don't actually know as you haven't replied to HB's request to know what happened after August 2019).

 

 

Edited by FTMDave
Typo
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CCJ VCS PCN -
2 hours ago, Sojacob said:

I have drafted my N244 and witness statement.

So post them up so we can have a look at them.

 

Yes, you should also post up your draft defence.

 

You also need to include a draft of the order you would like the court to make.  Look at Andyorch's post 67 here  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/439264-unknown-vcs-ccj-bristol-airport-stopping-in-a-zone-where-stopping-is-prohibited-was-abroad/page/3/#comments  (if you can't find it in post 67 look a couple of posts above and below, sometimes the post count goes wonky).   

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Points 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 & 1.8 are waffle and need to be cut out.  They have nothing whatsoever to do with why you didn't defend in time.

 

You say you have a realistic chance of defending but we can't see any defence

 

On 11/03/2022 at 10:06, FTMDave said:

Yes, you should also post up your draft defence.

 

You also need to include a draft of the order you would like the court to make.  Look at Andyorch's post 67 here  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/439264-unknown-vcs-ccj-bristol-airport-stopping-in-a-zone-where-stopping-is-prohibited-was-abroad/page/3/#comments  (if you can't find it in post 67 look a couple of posts above and below, sometimes the post count goes wonky).   

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in 1.3 give exhibit numbers to the copies of your air tickets and your passport, and mark them as such, so the judge knows what he/she is looking at.

 

The meat of your application is all prepared.

 

Get on with the defence and draft application now.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

LFI is spot on as usual.

 

It's unclear if you have already prepared a draft defence.  If not, have a look at Zimbird's thread  -

There is a draft set aside WS in post 103 (if you can't find the attachment look a couple of posts above or below, sometimes the post count goes wonky).

 

The Section "Defence 7-13" is an excellent starting point as yours too is a no stopping-VCS-airport case.

 

Obviously you would have to tweak it, especially (9), you can't state you weren't the driver if you were, and you can't use POFA to defend yourself it you were daft enough to admit you were the driver during your appeal (after we specifically said not to appeal).

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CCJ VCS PCN - stopping in a bus stop (marked with red line) - Southend airport
5 minutes ago, Sojacob said:

Please advise

Why?  You won't follow the advice.

 

The whole reason you're in this mess is because you ask for advice on multiple forums and then mix it all up and get your strategy wrong.  We said not to appeal - so you appealed.  Had you told us you'd received a Letter of Claim we could have dealt with the imminent legal action but you were elsewhere talking about the Letter of Claim.

 

Everyone on CAG is an unpaid volunteer, we have lots of people to help and not much time to do it in.  On Sunday evening late at night tired Caggers were looking up defences and draft orders previously used in set aside cases and lookinforinfo went to the trouble of explaining the importance of including the draft defence, and all along you had no intention whosoever of following any of that advice as you were working out a different strategy elsewhere.

 

You need to choose one site and stick to it. 

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

BN, from what the OP wrote on the other forum, they paid Simple Simon his whole judgement amount.

 

That's after shelling out £275 to apply for a set aside.

 

The OP also paid £190 on top of the judgement sum that Simon's solicitors just made up, despite being told by advisers on the other forum not to.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spot on Andy.

 

I think DCBL just produced a hugely-inflated bill and the OP paid it, despite being told on the other forum to ignore the made-up fees.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...