Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nettyg v Hsbc ***WON***


nettyg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5519 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 770
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks, i will - i think we've shot ourselves in the foot - you need to go at low tide else it disappears - and that's not til later - but tide's going out now - so we are going to chance it. watch for flares!

 

crusher likes my idea - what do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, stick to the timetable and you will get your money back (4 months beginning to end, roughly!)

 

just having a giggle: look at what's in the first post i ever wrote on your thread..........not bad, eh! one month to get the statements and 3 more to get to the dosh!

Link to post
Share on other sites

and that's what we like to see - people who take the time to read and see what's going on before jumping on the perverbial bandwagon -

this isn't a quick road to wealth - it's a way to study up and follow the plan and get back what they have unfairly and unlawfully charged you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just read the instructions - followed them and never posted at all until they made the final offer and then just as a summary...

- but when the aq arrived, couple of days later, i suspected foul play as offer was accepted and caused a few anxious moments and needed a little reassurance. i read a lot - just never posted.

made up for it now, huh!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd have to look back - babs had it for awhile.

bet this one beats it now -

one other forums - bankfodder ran a contest offering a £100 prize for something and the idea was to run the longest thread - and probably still has the record.

bong's court letters probably got longest post.

but i think nets probably has the most posts.

me, i think i died - did you see my eulogy!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

nets, i'm trying to get this out - it is for when the acknowledgment arrives and peeps are going to send their breakdowns to the court and to dg.

 

 

for the one they are sending dg - IF they have claimed for overdraft interest by using the advanced s/s - they could use this for dg at the point of the acknowledgment:

 

 

DG Solicitors

12 Calthorpe Road

Edgbaston

Birmingham

B15 1QZ

 

Dear Sir,

 

(Your Name) -v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my schedule of charges relating to the above claim.

 

I understand you have a policy of initially rejecting claims for overdraft interest. However, should this be the case after you have reviewed my claim, you should be aware that my claim for overdraft interest has been meticulously calculated and double checked. It only ever relates to the cumulative charges within the overdrawn balance of the account at the point that the overdraft interest was debited.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

thanks, kiddo!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

perky - looks like this is a new move on the court's part - thought it would be a grand idea to put all the discussion about it in one place - also somewhere to send the inevitable questions to - otherwise we'll be like headless chickens when more get it through this week - so refer them here

New---after 28 Days - Maybe No Aq!!!!!!!

if you don't want to be re peatiing yourself a zillion times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i only came downstairs after a nice looooooooong bubble bath to take some meat out to defrost and couldn't pass the computer without a quick look - i mean, now is that sad or what???? i'm getting counseling soon!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

fendy - can you pm hsbcrusher about trying to get old info - he is looking to help in some way or another - thankx.

 

 

and mostyn - don't send copies of statements - just the breakdown - 2 copies, will do....... and when you get your acknowledgment - send a copy of your breakdown to dg - their addy will be on page 2. put your claim number on it (it will come after the notice of issue)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...