got default judgement against apple re:macbook 2mts old that failed - sent in HCEO's - Apple sols SCS now saying wrong claimant?

[dx100uk]

If you have your money then ignore them.

Let them raise an n244 for £275 fee and poss lose that too.

 

await until unless you get notification from a court with a stamped court n244 that a set aside IS actually happening.

 

Stuff 'em!!

[dx100uk]

Aw bummer!!

 

 

[dx100uk]

NewRegister

REGISTER.FCA.ORG.UK

there is no apple uk on the fca register but apple retail uk

 

however on company house it says:

 

 

APPLE (UK) LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK

FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK

---

APPLE (UK) LIMITED - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual return...

 

 

[dx100uk]

which does not appear on companies house listings nor the FCA register.

 

however under people it throws up this:

 

HEINEN, Nancy Regina

Correspondence address

2 Furzeground Way, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1BB

Role RESIGNED

Secretary

Appointed on

12 January 2001

Resigned on

1 May 2006

 

but guess what that under apple (uk) ltd listing at Co House.

 

me thinks you ARE being given the run around.

 

if you read upload 

it tells you how to put an image upto PDF 

 

can we have the exact address from your claimform please

 

dx

 

 

 

[dx100uk]

then you filed to the wrong address sadly yes.

 

 

[dx100uk]

what name did you put as the defendant?

can you scan the claimform please

 

simply omit your details and the claim number

[dx100uk]

for our ease i've named the PDF's properly.

your issue is you sued 'apple', apple as a company or a legal entity does not exist.

i don't think the address is a material fact now. that webchat is correct, you used the correct address

Had you used the name on your invoice , Apple uk retail ltd, the claim would have been ok.

not sure where you go now. but the bailiffs are correct too as are Apples' solicitors.

[dx100uk]

ok not to put too finer point on the 'silly' mistake ( as in terms of you are a 'litigant in person' - joe public against the 'system') you made on your claim, there are guides on the same website about raising a claim and how to do it properly, but IMHO there should also be LiP leeway regarding this.

did you seek or read any help, as getting the correct entity to sue is quite important, the example you relate too would not be an issue, but suing a corporate entity is, they have lots of money and clever legal eagles.

i have no doubt that, by whatever way, should you rectify this error , you would be successful mind.

on another issue, have you written to apple uk retail offering to mutually settle this if they pay the price of the device or replace it and call it quits?

i will guess this is all you really wanted at the start and now at the end of the day.?

would you seriously lose out money wise if this were agreed?

[dx100uk]

the address is not your issue.

 

the fact you simply put Apple as the claimant's name is.

 

dx

[dx100uk]

text from claimform added to OP's last post for ease of reading as its one block of text.

 

yes BF that is the issue, the OP sued a non entity 'apple' instead of p'haps Apple retail UK

 

dx

[dx100uk]

the court wont/can't give legal advice , but should have pointed to the fact that judgement was already? done at that point, so you'd have to raise a new claim against the correct claimant anyway.

its a difficult one.

wrong address, wrong entity,

by 'claim' i will guess chat/phone was answering the question in relation to a claim against the warranty, not a court claim. 

ok they asked for it to be returned, but your damage claim, sadly would be against the courier who was?

now that might be a better route as if you win you'll get the current value of the device.

pers i  don't think you've a chance in hell of suing apple now as the device is busted.

thank for coming on the thread aunty.

[dx100uk]

those lines mean the screen is cracked, that doesn't necessarily mean the outer layer will have a crack in it mind, nor that one shows in any layer -  there are multiple layers. typically caused by a pressure point in the corner or twisting of the flip top or over tightening of the corner mountings. but it is cracked yes. worked on enough screens over +30yrs to recognise that exact damage.

 

you will have a very hard job proving it was an inherent fault at time of manufacture unless you find internet evidence of people with that lappy getting mystery screen cracks particularly in the bottom corners.

 

19 minutes ago, Mars1900 said:

To avoid any confusion I now have the MacBook back without fault.

you mean its been returned to you but ofcourse its still faulty.

 

 

 

[dx100uk]

promising, so it's not unheard of.

[dx100uk]

Dont forget pdfreducer and pdfmerge online websites in ypload guide

[dx100uk]

It wasnt until the upload of the 1st pdf that to me it was ever mentioned here that you had already paid for the repair and you now have a working laptop and were suing for the repair cost and customs fees.

so that's my courier idea out the window. I thought it was damaged in transit.

And the 1st time is seems 'someone' warren?, stated they would refund both long before your letter of claim then subsequent court claim .

Dx

[dx100uk]

what happened here?