Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help required urgently please - RBS charges claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

This is my first post on the forum so please bear with me.

 

I am in the process of litigation with RBS. I have received a CPR Part 18 request from Cobbetts to provide further details of the charges. I have now realised that the charges that I have detailed include agreed charges (royalties acccount fee at £5 per month) which I need to exclude from the claim. Can I change the particulars of the claim and how do I do this please?

 

I need to do this urgently as Cobbetts have stipulated a deadline for response of 13th December (ie I need to post this tomorrow latest) and I have received a questionnaie from teh cour which UI need to complete and retun by the 18th of December.

 

Many thanks!

 

Rgds

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can. You need to contact the court service to amend your claim. It will cost £35 though which is not claimable.

 

Ukaviator

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi post in the RBS section and read through some of the threads. i think you should be able to change it as long as you give all parties the new info. i hope a site helper will be able to help you more as i am is new to this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the quick response.

 

I have left a message witht the court to contact me regarding the chnage of details. Do I also need to contact Cobbetts, the solicitors, or will the courts do that on my behalf?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sorry, jumping onto your query, however, see that you are claiming RBS.

 

I am just about to start claim against RBS. Can you please tell me if you contacted your branch in the first instance or Head Office in Scotland.

 

Many thanks.

 

Maria

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maria,

 

I have indeed included the referrral charges. The difficulty that I had was that I included all of the charges to the account, which incorporated agreed royalty fees (non claimable), but as they are not separately identified, I am not sure what the original charges are?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Many thanks for that.

 

I have not included interest charges, as I think it will be far too complex for me to work out as I was also in an overdraft position. I have also not included any monthly charges.

 

So, here's hoping :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...