Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tax Problem


ronwicks
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1163 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I guess you know as you've been a member for many years that CAG forum rules don't allow us to name and recommend specific firms of solicitors or tax accountants but perhaps if you can give us some details people here with experience of executorship and IHT may be able to share their expertise with you.

Edited by Ethel Street
Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, gifts whether from an Estate or a gift while the giver is still alive, would not normally be considered the taxable income of the person who receives the money. Any tax liability of the giver's Estate for IHT is payable from the Estate not by the beneficiary. (Certain exceptions could apply if the Estate has no money to pay the IHT but let's put that aside.)

 

Secondly, what is your ex-wife's overall Estate worth? You only mention the money you gave her. Is the overall Estate over IHT threshold? Incidentally if you are separated but not divorced I'd think that for IHT law you are considered still married which might (or might not) be relevant here.

 

If Daughter A is the sole Executor then I'd expect all your wife' assets to be transferred to a bank account in the name of Daughter A. That's normal practice, the Executor becomes the legal owner of the assets and takes control of them so they can be paid out to beneficiaries.

 

I'd expect the Executor to have opened a separate bank account to put the Estate assets in. That's what I've always done when I've been Executor. The money in it wasn't mine personally, I held it on trust for the beneficiaries in my capacity as Executor. That's what would happen after death. Why your wife made the transfer before her death I cannot comment on.

 

If it was to avoid IHT liability then almost certainly it will fail, as a gift made that soon before her death will be treated by HMRC as part of her Estate for IHT purposes and Daughter A as Executor will have to deal with the Estate accordingly.

 

The fact that Daughter A may have paid the money out on school fees or whatever is irrelevant to the IHT liability of your wife's Estate. Small gifts from your wife's Estate are ignored for calculating IHT - detailed on HMRC website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean that your late wife's Estate at the time of her death was around £211,000 after  the £100k school fees and 2 x £20k gifts had been transferred out? Or that before her death the £211,000 had already been reduced by transferring out the £100k and 2x£20k? If the latter then her Estate at time of death would have been only c£70k (less any living and care expenses in the past year.). That's way below the threshold for IHT and HMRC will have no interest in your wife's Estate.

 

Even if she had had £211k at time of death it would have been well below the IHT threshold.

 

Either way the 2x£20k if transferred before your wife's death would probably be considered a gift from A not an inheritance.

 

And if Estate value was only around £70k you say it would have been further reduced by her care needs and that she had Alzheimer's. If she was in a dementia care home the care fees (assuming she was self-funding) would have used up most of that £70k. My mother was in a specialist dementia care home for the last year of her life in 2018 and the fees were over £50,000. So it could be that very little of of the money was left. It's possible the remaining Estate was so small it didn't need Probate.

 

Just speculation by me of course. Can you ask Daughter A what the position is?

 

I'm going to speculate on something else - this may be completely wrong so feel free correct me. I wonder if the reason for the transfer of the £100k + 2 x £20k while your wife was still alive was an attempt by Daughter A to remove your wife's assets from any local council financial assessment for care home fees? Sadly I think the attempt would have failed and the local coucil would have treated it as a deliberate deprivation of assets, but it sounds as if it never got to the point of asking the local council to pay her care home fees. Daughter A may have hoped that advance purchase of school fees was more likely to survive a 'deliberate deprivation of assets' challenge than merely making a cash gift.

 

I realise that this doesn't help you with the underlying issue that the effect of it all is that money has not been distributed equally between the 3 grandaughters. Have you discussed this with Daughter A?

 

Please note that I am not a lawyer or an expert, my comments are based solely on my own experience and research as executor and care home organiser for my parents and family members.

 

 

Edited by Ethel Street
Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ronwicks said:

 The 2 x £20k just recently - long after death, so would this still be a gift from A and subject to Tax, less £7k gift allowance? 

 

What's the £7k gift allowance? Sorry, I haven't come across it. AFAIK there is no tax on gifts given or received except where the giver dies within 7 years of making the gift. The gift might then be added back onto the giver's Estate for calculating IHT. Small gifts are ignored for this calculation, but there's no £7k mentioned in the HMRC page on this

 

https://www.gov.uk/inheritance-tax/gifts

 

Apart from the Inheritance Tax issue there are no tax implications that I am aware of.  

 

The IHT issue would only arise in your late wife's case if the total value of her Estate at date of death plus all gifts made in the previous 7 years (ignoring the exempt ones on that link) exceeded the IHT threshold, currently £325,000. From what you have said it wouldn't have done. In which case the whole question of gift allowances would not arise because the Esatate was not liable for IHT anyway. (Disclaimer again, I am not a tax expert and this isn't tax advice. Just sharing my experiences).

Edited by Ethel Street
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Andyorch said:

I think they are referring to PETS ( potentially exempt transfers )  ?

Yes, which is essentially just the formal tax law language for gifts and IHT which I referred to above. "Potentially Exempt Transfers" are only exempt if you live more than 7 years after giving the gift, "Exempt Transfers" are the low value gifts detailed on the HMRC link in my last post. They are always exempt whether you live 7 years or not. I thought OP was referring to the exempt gifts allowance but £7k is not one of the amounts mentioned on the HMRC page as far as I can see, hence me asking OP for clarification.

 

@ronwicksI see your clarification. But as I said before the gift is only relevant if the value of Estate at date of death plus the transfers in the prior 7 years would exceed the current £325,000 IHT threshold. From what you've said the IHT threshold would not be exceeded whatever way you classify the £20k gifts so no IHT will be due. In any case the £20k gifts were made some time after your late wife's death so the gift rules are irrelevant. They sound like a payment to beneficiaries made under your late wife's will, not gifts.

Edited by Ethel Street
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally @ronwicks I noticed you said that your wife passed away on 8th January 2021, only 6 weeks ago, and you could find no trace of Probate having been granted.

 

Even at the best of times getting Probate issued within 6 weeks would be extremely fast. It usually takes several months so you wouldn't expect to see it yet. The Probate office has been struggling with the combined effects of Covid and a new online Probate application system that didn't work well and long delays in getting Probate have been reported. 

 

Is this the site where you have been looking?  https://www.gov.uk/search-will-probate  Wills only appears here when Probate has been granted and anyone can ask for a copy (small fee)

Edited by Ethel Street
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...