Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Being chased by debt collectors for a vet's bill


T C B
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 647 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Its just come to my attention that a friend has been getting pressure from a company called ACT credit management.

They are collecting a debt on behalf of a service provider.  My friend has been pressured to pay far more than they can afford and I've suggested that they request an income and expenditure form.

This has been sent but insists on evidence for all about goings. Bank statements etc. Can they legally insist on this evidence.

 

I'd also like to know if it reasonable to request details of the debt. it wasn't  credit agreement it was for an essential service that should have been paid when the invoice was presented. I'm not convinced that the original cost was fair. 

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response

Emergency vet bill. I don't think they've bought the debt judging by the way they word the letters

Value is about 2k, Paid online monthly. 

Original arrangement was set up over the phone a couple of years ago. They call every month and refuse to drop the payment to a reasonable, affordable amount.

 

No problem filling out an income and expenditure form i just don't think asking form evidence is reasonable.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for responses.

 

The post thats been deleted was posted before the post requesting bullet points. I was deliberately vague on the type of debt it was. However a utility company is not a service provider

 

The answer provided in respect of the income form is great.

 

The only question i have now is if its reasonable to request  breakdown of how the debt has been calculated and any contract hey may have been in place.

 

Thanks again 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Being chased by debt collectors for a vet's bill
  • 1 year later...

I just wanted to update this thread...its been a long time!

 

I submitted an SAR and the content I got back was unbelievable and quite shocking!

Internal emails with very derogatory remarks about the account holders financial position and the passing of a relative.

lots of admissions regarding coercive and intimidation behaviour by the firms agents and in particular lots of references to fees being applied to the account.

 

I proceeded to put questions to them and ask for information in relation to the fees.

 

To cut a long story. They have refused to provide further information but have wiped the debt which was several £k. which is , to my mind,  an indication that they are in water they don't like.

 

I am not happy to let this go as I feel they need holding to account and i want to know how much in fees they have added.

 

Who do i complain to? The FCA?  they referred me to the CSA but I doubt they'll have any teeth

 

Thanks in advance...Tim 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...