Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CEL MNPR PCN - no permit - The Albert Social Club, Albert Stress, Fleet, Hampshire


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1298 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

 

I’m brand new here and someone on another forum instructed me to come here for advice. 

 

I lost my job due to Covid and have been trying to make ends meat by doing a delivery job. Unfortunately in my first week of doing it, I parked somewhere I shouldn’t have. 

 

I just got a letter in the post saying I have a £100 parking fine that’s reduced to £60 if I pay within 14 days. 

 

I parked in the car park at a social club for about about 15 mins not realising I couldn’t park there. I’m 99% sure it’s a council car park (says PCN).

 

It says at the bottom that failure to pay the amount due within 28 days of issue may result in Civil Enforcement LTD (the creditor) forwarding my account to a debt recovery agency and I may incur additional costs. 

 

As I say, I didn’t realise I couldn’t park there. If I didn’t pay it, are they “empty threats” or would they pursue this and I get charged more and have a debt agency come round?

 

I really don’t want to pay it if I don’t have to as I don’t have any money as it is. But at the same time I don’t want the price to go up and I pay more as well as it affecting my credit. 

 

I’d love it if people could help. Let me know what other info you need and I am happy to provide it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all that came in the post. I haven't received any photos of my car parked there. Please let me know if I should have blurred anything else out and I'll quickly remove this post then reupload the photos.

 

 

 

CEL PCN.pdf

Edited by FTMDave
Image pasted to thread now converted to PDF
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks you think I shouldn't pay it?

What's the next step?

I assume I'm going to get more letters coming through my letter box that I'll continue to post on here but likely to just ignore?

 

Should I also fill in that form you sent me?

If so should I be filling it out from where it says

"For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture"? 

You did say it's a different sort of Parking Notice so I'm not sure if I still need to fill that in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks.

Am I able to private message you?

Currently I haven't written enough messages to be able to do that but there's something I wanted to ask in private.

 

Also it's a very small car park (about 15 car park bays maybe?) in a very quiet area

I highly doubt anyone's had the same issues in that car park since there's so little traffic and cars that park there but happy to write it.

 

I'm just wary over the fact that it might be easy to work out who I am from the date/time of parking and the car park it happened in? Based on this, is it ok to say the name of the car park? 

 

All of the information I have is on that letter I uploaded so when I fill in the form, I'll just be taking the info from that letter anyway.

 

Lastly, is it worth me speaking to the community club and say I'm very sorry for the car in my name being parked there (not mentioning I drove it). I can they say it was night and the driver couldn't see any signs about not being allowed to park there.

 

Then I can politely ask if they could let the designated driver off this time and in future when they see the car driving around doing deliveries (that is a popular road for deliveries), the driver will make sure not to park at the community club. Is that worth a go? Would the community club have the means and power to "cancel" my parking charge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I stopped at the social club because I had 2 deliveries on that road.

I decided parking in one of the bays there was easier than on the road.

 

Once parked there I went to the first house to deliver (took a while to find so my car ended up sitting in the car park for maybe 10-15 mins) and then onto the next house to deliver.

 

I've done some research on Civil Enforcement Ltd online and it does seem they go all the way and take people to court.

 

Honestly, should I just pay up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if the signs were illuminated. I didn't see them but wasn't really looking. I was in a rush so quickly parked my car and jumped out of it. I can possibly have a look this Wednesday to check.

 

I'm happy to put up a fight but only if I'm likely to win. It would be horrible to lose the fight and end up paying more. I've never been to court and I probably wouldn't be able to argue my case in a clear and articulate way. But if it did get to that stage I hope i could have a spokesperson. Before that stage, I'll always go with the advice given on here!

 

Answers to the form below:

 

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

(must be received within 14 days from the Incident)

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement

27th September 2020

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

Firstly I'm not sure if the letter I received is an NTK as it doesn't explicitly say "Notice To Keeper" anywhere. It says "Issue Date" 1st October 2020 although I only received the letter today (5th October 2020).
 

[scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

 

3 Date received

5th October 2020

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

N9
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

No
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

No
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

No
 

7 Who is the parking company?

Civil Enforcement LTD

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

The Albert Social Club, Albert Stress, Fleet, Hampshire
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

cs-service / POPLA / BPA

 

 

 

On another note I've just realised it does say the time I was parked in the car park and it was much longer than I realised.  28 mins 48 seconds "apparently".

Edited by Keeping It Anonymous
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL MNPR PCN - no permit - The Albert Social Club, Albert Stress, Fleet, Hampshire

I've done some research and there would've been an ANPR system taking snaps of the driver's numberplate entering and exiting.

 

Whilst they can't prove the exact period of parking, nor what the driver did in the intervening period the court would likely conclude, on the balance of probabilities, the driver was 'parking' in breach of the signs. But CEL's PCN's are bad and they don't have to put photos on there is what I've read.

 

Also, called the social club and went to voicemail.

They open at 3pm so trying again then.

Called via a private number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually asked this same question on another forum but I was reluctant to mention that in case the two forums are competitive: 

 

http://forums.National Consumer Service.com/index.php?showtopic=136222&st=0&gopid=1590099&#entry1590099)

 

The advice on that forum was a bit different and at times contradicted what I was told on here.

For example, someone recommended sending a letter to them as no PoFA compliance, saying:

 

Dear Sirs,

I have just received your Notice to Keeper xxxxx for vehicle VRM xxxx

You have failed to comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of The Protection Of Freedoms Act 2012 namely, but not limited to, failing to give notice of keeper liability as prescribed by section 9 (2) (f) of the Act.

You have also failed to give the invitation to keeper in the format prescribed by section 9 (2) (e) of the Act.

You cannot, therefore, transfer liability for the alleged charge from the driver at the time to me, the keeper.

There is no legal requirement to name the driver at the time and I will not be doing so.

I do not expect to hear from you again, or your debt collectors, except to confirm that no further action will be taken on this matter and my personal details have been removed from your records.

Yours etc


First class post with a free certificate of posting from a post office

 

 

What do you think of this idea?

Also I hope you don't mind me posting on another forum too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...