Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Athena ANPR PCN - overstay - Edmonton Lidl **WON CANCELLED BY CEO**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1319 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Just in need of some help with a parking charge received from Athena ANPR Ltd. 
Parked in a Lidl carpark and didn't scan the receipt to register vehicle details before leaving shop/carpark - this means the the free parking time was only for 10mins instead of 90mins, but shopped for 1hr 6mins, therefore exceeding this by 56mins.

 

For the last few months, this particular store did not require drivers to register vehicle details due to COVID-19 (staff have been saying it for ages and machines wouldn't allow details to be entered), and so I didn't even look at the machines to be honest and just left the store. Obviously the normal system has been reintroduced but have no idea when it started up again as I have been several times leading up to the date of infringement without any previous fines.

 

Any advice about how I could go about getting this cancelled? 

Can this charge be enforced?

 

I have answered the questionnaire below and attached pdf of the letter.

Thanks,
sakachmi

 

1 Date of the infringement

09/09/2020
 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]

11/09/2020
 

3 Date received

14/09/2020
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]

No
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event?

Yes, entry and exit photos
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]

No
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

N/A
 

7 Who is the parking company?

Athena ANPR Ltd
 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

Lidl Edmonton, London

 

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

IAS

 

 

Parking Charge Notice - Athena ANPR Ltd.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, the email address bounced back for the CEO and when searching online for Chris Hartnagel, it gives [email protected], which I emailed on 18th Sept and haven't received a response as yet. I also sent info through to Lidl Customer Services via the online contact form and have received an acknowledgement email from them, followed up by another email today basically saying they are very busy and it will take longer to get a reply, so either wait for reply or telephone if urgent 😐

 

Today I did another search about ceo's email addy and found a post from a different forum website - with a successful outcome! - (https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5996157/win-against-lidl-eastleigh-and-athena-apnr), with what appears to be the correct email address: [email protected].

I have re-sent the email just now and it hasn't bounced back as "rejected", so fingers crossed will hear back fairly soon. I will be sure to give an update on here when/if I eventually get one.

 

Also, I had another question, looking at some of the older posts about this same topic there are several where a 3 hour parking restriction from the Council is mentioned, is this time frame something that is standard/the norm for most Council's?

I have had a look at the planning permission from Enfield Council and there doesn't seem to be anything I can find that refuses or overrides Lidl's outlining of the parking duration and costs that will be charged by Athena ANPR Ltd (attached documents).

 

 

TP_85_1476_DP3--1224952 - Lidl Paking Supporting Information.pdf TP_85_1476_DP3--1224955 - Enfield Council Approval Decision.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

So after sending the email to CEO, the ticket has been successfully cancelled - result!

 

My original email:

 

Dear Mr. Christian Hartnagel,

 

Re: Parking Charge Notice No: 0 XXX XXX XXX
Vehicle Registration: XXXX XXX
Issue Date: 11/09/2020
Entered Car Park: 09/09/2020 @ XX:XX:XX
Exited Car Park: 09/09/2020 @ XX:XX:XX
Athena claim an Overstay of 56mins.
Photo attached of the receipt valued to your company as sales of £24.77.


I am writing as the registered keeper of a car in reference to Athena ANPR Ltd's Notice to Keeper (ref: X XXX XXX XXX).

 

The vehicle was parked in the car park of your Edmonton store on Thursday 9th September 2020, while the driver was doing their shopping inside said Lidl store. After they paid for their shopping, they unfortunately did not enter the vehicle registration details into the parking machine before leaving the store/car park. The registering of vehicles’ details has not been required for the last few months during the COVID-19 crisis, and so, this instance was unintentional. Had a member of staff mentioned that normal parking procedure had resumed, the driver would have inputted the vehicle information as was done prior to the COVID-19 changes.
 

As a result of this, Athena ANPR Ltd has issued a civil parking charge notice without any consideration of the situation.

 

The driver has been to your shop in Edmonton store to try and get the issue resolved but was advised to get in touch with Lidl Customer Services. So far getting a response from Customer Services other than an acknowledgement, has been rather difficult.
 

The driver is a valued and loyal customer and this is very unfair, and therefore I, as the registered keeper, kindly ask that you instruct Athena ANPR Ltd to cancel this parking charge notice.
 

Kind regards,
Mr XXXXXXX

 


And I just got this reply: 

 

Dear Mr. XXXXXX

Our Ref: XXXXXX

Re: Your Contact

Thank you for taking the time to contact our CEO. I have been asked to reply on his behalf.

I was sorry to learn that you received a parking charge. I appreciate this may have been frustrating for you.

Lidl is a national retailer. As such, we have stores in locations with limited parking space and in common with many of our competitors, our store car parks are abused to a significant and detrimental extent. We have therefore judged it necessary to take measures so that our stores parking facilities are available first and foremost to our customers.

In order to ensure that sufficient parking spaces are available at all times to our customers, Lidl employs third party contractors to monitor and control our car parks. So far, this service has proved reliable and effective in reducing car park abuse and in freeing up spaces for our customers.

In light of your comments, on this occasion only, I have requested that the parking charge is cancelled. Athena will confirm the cancellation in writing in due course.

Thank you again for contacting us.

Yours sincerely,
For and on behalf of Lidl Great Britain Limited

Kayleigh Hogg
Customer Service

***

If this ever happens again, I will make sure to always go via CEO route and make sure receipts are kept.

Thanks to everyone for your help with this 👍 

***

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • FTMDave changed the title to Athena ANPR PCN - overstay - Edmonton Lidl **WON CANCELLED BY CEO**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...