Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Goosedale WEDDING VENUE REFUSING REFUND *** Settled by Tomlin Order***


intree
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Seems to be a delusion that these Venus have that they can keep money they do not provide any service for, here is the DQ from Goosedale - he now wants the claim to be heard in Nottingham and wants mediation, when he has made us incur over £500 in costs, wasted Court time and also refused to consider the CMA guidelines.

 

It appears he has now dismissed his legal team, although he may think the Judge will listen to his claim that he can provide no service and still keep the money - Wow how can this be allowed when there is a law against this which has been clear and concise set out in the CMA letter sent to this venue and others since March 2020.t

I am awaiting the Press to publicise this venue and others like them, who have abused the very people who wanted to use them for one of the most memorable days of their lives.

 

They certainly have made it memorable, never to use them again - Advice to others Take them to Court and let a Judge see what they are doing its not moral or indeed acceptable.

 

 

 

Scans_20210122_150955.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

We will of course be informing the Court that we are LIP and the costs we have had to incur due to the unreasonable behaviour of the defendant including forcing us to incur costs and further costs, and refusing to deal with the LBC.

 

On a more ethical tone the firm of solicitors noted here are correct in the interpretation of the law as it stood since March 2019,

 

https://www.ellisjones.co.uk/blog/article/what-is-the-current-effect-of-coronavirus-on-my-wedding-contract

 

Goosedale the defendant has been given all these facts and informed that our daughter was married in a Civil ceremony last year with 15 Guests, hence they are not only wasting Court time but have cost us severe distress, inconvenience and loss of money to date, all which will be dealt with at a Hearing now. where the Defendant stated only a Judge can make the order to make him refund the money, hence his actions have caused immense waste of Court time and is an abuse of the Court Process, shame on Goosedale and equally shame on DWF what a joke !!

 

CMA have given the correct interpretation of the law - THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO KEEP A SINGLE PENNY THEY HAVE NOT PROVIDED ANYTHING FOR they have known this since March 2019.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

We are particularly concerned that they have mislead the truth in their defence to the Court stating we agreed to a reduced number of guests to change the contract, for 8/10/20 and also stated we cancelled this date, both facts which are concerning as the contract was accepted and confirmed as Frustrated since May 23 2020, we were merely postponing as they refused to refund us, so we had been told "NO REFUNDS - POSTPONE"

 

They are trying their luck and this is one of the most disgraceful companies we have dealt with to date in our concerns, while we have been members in the Forum, please families and couples note, this thread before they book this venue they are not ones to be trusted or relied on for a service, then they will charge you for the privilege of not providing you anything but lies and excuses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy I am so frustrated as we have no money and have had to borrow to pay for my daughters wedding last year and still in the situation created by Goosedale, where we are paying back a loan to cover the small wedding event, when they should have refunded this last year, we are so disappointed how they have behaved.

 

Thank you for your assistance, as soon as I can recover the money I will of course make a donation to the Forum as your help and support has been much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy this is a copy of their DQ which they sent to us by recorded deliver but did not post up on the Court until the unless order, we can confirm that we have not still received the Court copy of the DQ or if they have changed the solicitors or indeed if Mr XXXXX is still defending the claim in person so we are not sure.

 

Scans_20210122_150955.pdf

 

sorry I will post in main forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy I will start on the witness statements and the documents on file, by end of this month to be issued to Court and as detailed by the date given, I will post up the statements in Private before I submit these to the Court in time for the Hearing.

 

We will of course Post the documents to the defendant to their last address we have on file.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

further clarification of the law by a law firm:

 

https://www.fsp-law.com/to-have-and-to-hold-cma-issues-guidance-for-the-wedding-industry/

 

These Venues are so deluded they have no regard for their customers or any of the brides and grooms who have given them their life savings for a special day, instead they have become greed ridden and have interpreted the law to suit their own affairs, given that the Government has given and supported these venues with Tax payers money while including Furlough support; they really have been taking the money on both sides of the coin and then providing nothing to their customers this is against the CMA guidance and the law of Frustrated Contracts.

 

The Irony is they have accepted the contracts are frustrated but they wish to keep hold of funds to which they have not provided any service for, technically this is theft and the sooner the CMA takes action the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can the Forum also confirm the following as I can not seem to understand how the Defendant proposes to keep funds we have given them on the basis:

 

  1. The contract was Frustrated due to covid restrictions in May 2020, and accepted by them as such, hence the proposed new dates which we had been told we must accept failing which there will be no refund.
  2. The Contract has no variation clauses, which we have agreed to or can be agreed to as the venue was hired for 350 guests and they have stated a revised contract was agreed, this is a lie, hence we are concerned they are trying to confuse the Court with claiming they are entitled to keep 80% of the whole payment of £7700, which is again against CMA guidelines.
  3. In the alternative they are arguing that we have a Frustrated contract but we owe them money and this amounts to 30% of the whole amount due, it seem they wish to rely on the claim of Bijou, however they have not provided any bespoke or relevant or indeed any service to us, in addition this is again against the CMA guidelines.

I can confirm that our witness statement will be completed together with all the above information and together with a letter from the Defendants and their emails and our letters before claim, as we have serious concerns that the defence is misleading the Court.

 

We can confirm that we have spent Hours dealing with this matter to date, since the start of the claim and we understand that, we have incurred additional costs of pursuing a claim which should have been settled at the point when we issued the Letter before Claim, at at the time the Defendant refused to issue the refund based on his own interpretation of the facts and law dated 23 September 2020.

 

We will of course be approaching the press once this matter has been through the Court as there are hundreds of other people who have been left in the same situation and venues like these and the legal advisors have just become greedy and have tried to hold on to funds which the CMA has confirmed they are not and never have been entitled to.

 

I await the good advice of the Forum and can confirm that I am grateful for the advices given to allow the matter to reach this crucial stage before I approach the National and local press in this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Andy and BankFodder

 

I will start preparing my witness statements next month to send to the forum in private in first week of June I am currently  going through the documents and would just be obliged if you can let me know if I need to include all documents in the file I have or the most important ones to show the contract, the frustration , Letter before claim and the responses from the defendants. I can confirm that I am still not advised if the Solicitors have informed the Court they will be representing the Defendant and the last response from the Court in this matter was in January when they stated the Defendant was acting on his own.

 

I am hoping to follow the protocol for witness statements here https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/standard-directions/general/witness-statements but if this is not correct please can I be advised, I also wish to hold on posting the final version in the main forum until a later date as the Defendant is reading the posts I am making but not in dialogue to resolve this matter, which is very concerning.

 

Thank you for all the advice and assistance to date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I now attach the Draft I am completing the full document list and the statement will be finalised by the deadline, I would be obliged if I can be advised if the format is correct and if the content of the statement is in order, I am also compiling all the Government Guidance issued on the relevant dates and this will be included in the final version.

 

Thank you for all your advice to date and the matter will be ready for the Hearing in due course.

 

WS DRAFT 2.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date for Court and Service is 25 June 2021 so I will post send these by this date once finalised with the documents I need to be seen by the Court, please can it be confirmed will I need separate statements from my daughter and Husband or can this all be included in this document as it has been.

 

My daughter is confirming what I have sated, and my husband needs to make the statement when he spoke to the Venue to confirm that we did not accept their date of 08 October 2020 as it was not a weekend and the venue was not able to provide the service we paid for in full at all, his telephone call was cut off and ignored by the defendant as with all our communication to them including the letter before claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Andy I am finalising and documenting the final version and will post this up as soon as this has been completed next week, I can confirm that I am preparing 3 Copies of

1) List of documents

2)Witness statements

I expect to be in a position to post the final version once approved here to the defendants by 23 June and send to the Court by email on the same date.

 

I am a little confused about what legal costs I can claim, I understand Litigant in person costs are £19 per hour, I have calculated that I have to date spent over 46 Hours on the matter since the claim went into Court, this includes preparing the documents, scanning and responding to the claim this is in addition to the cots already incurred. please can I be advised what format I need to sent to the Court and by which date or will this go in with the above documents by the deadline of 25 June 2021.

 

All advice appreciated as before,  thank you for all the support to date.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the information Andy, I can confirm that I will not be claiming for loss of wages but just want to be compensated for the hours of work I completed in dealing with this matter when in fact it should have been resolved and the money refunded in September 2020.

 

I have spent on average over the last two weeks 10 hours a week sorting the documents out, in the time to the claim being submitted and the claim being resent to include my daughter and the venue refusing to deal with me, I had already spent over 20 Hours on preparing the claim, the documents dealing with the issue of re- issuing proceedings and adding my daughter and then a further Research and a further 6 hours in dealing with the defendant.

 

So I propose to claim as follows:

  1. 20 Hours Research and issuing of proceedings to Court and defending claim, to add my daughter from 04 September 2020 to January 05 2021.
  2. 6 Hours to deal with the matters in relation to the defendant and there DQ and incorrect filing and raising this with the court.
  3. 10 Hours per week from 01 June 2021 through to 23 June 2020 in preparing the documents, filing the documents, dealing with all statement issues and calibrating the claim to prepare for the Hearing on 09 July 2021, including 30 minutes to attend that Hearing

I therefore propose to claim as per the guidelines £19.00 per hour for 46 Hours which is a total of £874, I also will list that the defendant owes interest at the rate specified on the claim form at a daily rate together with costs of £105, awarded to me, for him forcing me to add my daughter to the claim.

 

There are also costs associated with the claim issuance and this will be in addition, I will of course send this to the Defendant by recorded delivery on the 5 July 2021 and issue this to the Court by email.

 

I hope that this is on order if there is any mistake or something is not correct please be feel to correct me, I will of course post up the final version on here  on 4 July 2021.

 

Thank you for all your kind support to date, I dont think I could have got this far without your help and guidance and hope that the matter will soon be closed and the refund issued through Court as per the CMA guidelines and the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that advice Andy I will post up the final version before submission to the other side and Court at the relevant times given by the Court and for the costs on the 05 July 2021.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

while we are dealing with unprofessional and less customer focused Venue managers at Goosedale, we have a number of relatives who have been given options by their Venue management including a FULL UNCONDITIONAL REFUND,  the latest one issued to a relative yesterday has been attached.

 

It is now clear not all venues are being unreasonable, and are helping couples who are in need of the funds to plan for their big day at a alternative arrangement.

 

I must state it is extremely vital you look at the history of the venue dealing with Customers before you hand over your money to them, and only deal with Venues now which provide the assurances and services to give you the correct options and not Force the matter through Court like we are : Goosedale shame on you for trading in such a unprofessional manner.

venue refund from a good business.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy just a quick question if we provide links to the law we rely on for instance do we have to provide paper copies in addition or just the links are sufficient as below, if I provide a working link on the court emailed documents do I also need to provide a printed copy to the Court, I will be emailing all  the papers and the statements to the Court as I don't think I will have them finalised before 23 June earliest so, 

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/wedding-services-coronavirus-covid-19-cancellations-and-refunds/wedding-services-affected-by-covid-19-statement-of-the-cmas-position-on-cancellation-and-refunds

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/covid-19-refunds-cma-warns-wedding-firms-over-unfair-practices

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cma-to-investigate-concerns-about-cancellation-policies-during-the-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic/the-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic-consumer-contracts-cancellation-and-refunds

 

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-wedding-and-civil-partnership-ceremonies-receptions-and-celebrations

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cma-to-investigate-concerns-about-cancellation-policies-during-the-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic

 

 

Consumer Rights Act 2015: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/contents/enacted

       Unfair Trading Regulations (2008):  https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/1277/contents/made

Frustrated Contracts law: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/6-7/40

 

 

I assume if I am correct I can send by email before 2pm 24 June 2021 to put in the forum and send  to both the defendants and the  Court, please can I be advised what I do if the defendants do not issue me with their documents by the above date as they have been completely unreasonable to date in their dealing with matters in Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...