Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Half of order out of stock (no option to cancel) ***Resolved***


Dave421
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Is there anything under the consumer rights law about this?

 

I recently purchased 3 items off a website, a pair of flip flops and 2 t-shirts. The main thing I wanted was the flip flops. The t-shirts were added to make my order worthwhile as it was £4 postage. 

 

I received an email this afternoon telling me neither of the t-shirts were in stock which was due to a warehouse stock error. They gave me no opportunity to modify or cancel my order because of this. 

 

In fact it seemed they very quickly shipped just the flip flops around the time of sending me that email which appears to be because they knew I'd want to cancel (as it would be £4 postage just for a £6 pair of flip flops). Nobody would pay that amount in postage for such a low value item after all (t-shirts were £8 each so it made it worthwhile). 

 

They haven't been able to fulfill their part of the "contract" yet gave me no option to cancel. Now if I wanted a refund I forfeit the amount paid in delivery and have to send the flip flops back at my own expense...aka pointless. 

 

 

Edited by Dave421
Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is returns postage.

They don't cover the cost so with paying to return it, I'd only receive £6 refund.

I'd have lost out on the £4 delivery fee and a few quid to send it back to them so not worth it. 

 

I wanted all 3 items to make it worthwhile paying £4 delivery.

They took money for all 3 items and delivery fee, then today said warehouse error and 2 items are out of stock (I got refunded). 

 

I don't want just 1 item, I'd have never bought that on its own as it's not worth the p and p.

They didn't give me any time to amend or cancel my order, even though it was their mistake as to why 2 of the 3 items weren't available. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect, thanks. 

 

I've got a feeling it might be hard to reject them due to the coronavirus as it will likely just be left outside but will try that. 

 

Is there an exact thing in the CRA I can quote at then regarding not giving me any option to amend or cancel my order after they changed the contract? 

 

I will try and refuse it today, otherwise I will get that letter sent to them and start a chargeback. Would I say that if they want the goods back, they pay for postage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

All sorted (posting how it went for others in future)

 

Yesterday after the notification of warehouse error, I sent an email saying about being unhappy about this 1 item being sent on its own without being presented with any option because of their mistake and having to pay full postage. 

 

No positive outcome was expected. 

 

Today to my surprise they've refunded the postage costs (this should have been done right away thus I expected a battle). 

 

Thanks again all. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Half of order out of stock (no option to cancel) ***Resolved***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...