Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Samsung Tumble Dryer Failure Now Washer 9 months old ***Resolved***


pumpytums
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok heres what you do.

if it was bought online, find the pdf receipt from your emails and either print it or keep it handy.

 

go to your local shop and explain to the customer service that you are now rejecting further repairs under CRA. have the most recent job numbers handy.

 

as the items were delivered they will be able to locate whats known as the SALT number by going into the till under reporting, receipt lookup and using the details you have on your receipt.  if it was bought online using online credit, you will need to phone customer services as stores cannot access the online credit facilities.

if it was paid by card or in store you're fine.

 

choose a replacement or request a refund (you won't get the money back till its been collected).

if its over 100 days old, they will need to process a manual refund due to eclipse till system limitations.

when returning in the reason field they put "rejected further repairs under CRA, prev job ref xxx"

then the serial number (please have it handy)

then under RA they put CRA faulty returns.

 

it goes down as a pending refund, once its collected you return to store with your card (or to collect your cash). and its done.

the item will be returned to 7800 and processed to go back to samsung.

 

if store argues they won't do it due to a chargeback, they will not get one if you include the prev job ref's as head office are able to see the attempted repairs via these refs when cross referencing with samsung.

 

if the store argues, get them to ring sheffield call centre and ask for an empowerment.

this also stops the store being charged the retail value on their P&L.

 

without revealing who i am or which store i (until very recently) worked in, this is the correct process.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Samsung Tumble Dryer Failure Now Washer 9 months old ***Resolved***

great stuff. i will continue to lurk and help with any currys pcw related items i can.

bare in mind i no longer work for the company any things may change in the future as far as processes.

 

id personally never buy anything samsung after having had to call their useless customer service for the past few years.

they dont deserve your money

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...