Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

VCS PCN Claimform - no stopping - spycar CCTV - Liverpool Airport "offence"


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

 

Started a new thread on this as there are quite a few on here already that I have read.

 

Would be greatful for any advice on this.

 

My partner has received a PCN from VCS Ltd saying that she owes them £100 for stopping on red lines. Or only £60 within 14 days of the issue date.

 

She wanted to just pay it and I said no chance. So I'm gonna fight it on her behalf. I have had no contact with VCS and after reading other threads will be ignoring any letters until there is a letter from a solicitor regarding a court summons.

 

Is this the correct procedure at this point?

 

Cheers

hobnail

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement - 30/8/19

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] - 6/9/19

 

3 Date received - 12/9/19

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] - NO

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? - YES

 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] - NO

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up - N/A

 

7 Who is the parking company? - Vehicle Control Services Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] - Liverpool JL Airport L24 1YD

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. - looks like IAS

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here - N/A

 

Here is the pdf as requested

 

cheers

front and back of letter

 

 

 

 

back of letter

PCN-NTK.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to VCS PCN - no stopping - spycar CCTV - Liverpool Airport "offence" haha :)

Thats ok honeybee if you a mod I can understand that :)

 

So i'll just ignore until I get a Letter Before Action right?

 

They must really coin it in from people who can't be asked to fight it or just think its "the law"

 

What a sad world we live in when greed and corruption are the norm.

hobnail

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye they are scumbags alright.

 

We were late getting to the airport so droped the girlfriend off to check bags in before I went to park the car in prepay carpark.

 

Saw they wanted £3 just to drop off so though I'll just pull over - only took about 60 secs. So they fleece you for £3 or £100 either way they robbing you blind. 😠

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to VCS PCN - no stopping - spycar CCTV - Liverpool Airport "offence"
  • 3 weeks later...

Hello again,

 

I was wondering how long it would be before I start getting more letters from VCS. Its been over a month now since our first letter.

 

Is it usual for them to take ages to sent further threats of court/increased fines ect.....??

 

Is it wishful thinking that they leave us alone now?

 

Cheers again

hobnail

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brassnecked

 

No I've ignored them so far. Told to just wait until I get the LBA from them. Just thought it strange I've had no more threats from them since. I was expecting more "fear" thats all.

 

Not that I'm worried tho

😉

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi guy thought I would update you all. Got this new letter just before Xmas its not a LBA as far as I can tell but it looks like they have sold the "debt" on to  a new company. Is this a new tactic of VCS Ltd????

 

If so can I just expect more threats thru the post or could I now get the LMA from this new company - Debt Recovery Plus?

 

Cheers again

:)

 

 

DR+ threat-o-gram.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok cheers

 

I'm very relaxed about it TBH. I've not contacted with them whatsoever so far. They can sent as many threats as they want I won't be loosing any sleep ;)

 

Edited by Hobnail
misspell
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok cool thought it looked like more rubbish.

 

I'll add it to my collection of threat o'grams and do nothing.

 

Like I said before I've had no contact with them whatsover. Surely they would have to prove who was driving the car anyway (if my partner admitted to it) before they could even think about taking to court?

 

Anyway cheers for the help again. I'll sit back and relax some more 😉

hobnail

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thought I was up to speed???

 

I'm waiting for a letter before action/court. Then I engage with my one and only letter to them telling them to go swivel cos they have no claim against us right?

 

Would you rather me not post updates? thought it helped the site to do this. Surely people posting updates keeps everyone in the know about these bandits current tactics?

 

hobnail

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers HB

 

I have read quite a few other threads although it was back in sep/oct when I first found the site. Will try and have a look at a few more time permmiting.

 

not sure what DX's point was.

 

hobnail

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Latest threat from them came about a week ago.

 

I'm beginging to think the LBA is not going to be forthcoming.

 

 I read earlier in thread that VCS can't get a Solicitor to take it on for them so maybe this is all they can do.

 

Anyway I've attacted latest letter to keep up to date.

 

 

DR+ 3rd threat-o-gram.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Okay here is the latest letter we received yesterday.

 

Although it doesn't say "Letter Before Action" it does state "Notice of intention to commence legal proceedings" is this the same thing????

 

I suspect this is more threat o grams and I can still ignore it as it does not look like any of the LMA letters I have seen on the site.

 

Or if anyone thinks a snotty letter should be sent I could construct one?

 

Cheers

 

 

Zenith - Notice of intention to commence legal proceedings.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the replies.

 

I will carry on relaxing about it all. 

I'm not gonna write any letters unless I have too.

Don't want to spend the cost of a stamp on them.

 

Its discusting that firstly the Airports let VCS have a contract to fleece people and then the DVLA sell peoples details on to him. 

Both are obviously making a nice earner out of it.

 

Our society is rotten to the core when this is going on. 

A people with no morals equals a people that are ultimately enslaved.

It's how the Law of Nature works.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello good people.

 

It's been ages since I posted on this thread. I have had a few more threats from new debt collecting companys but did'nt post because I knew that was all they where.

 

I got this one yesterday and wandered if someone could have a look and tell me if this is the "letter before action" I've been waiting for since back in 2019.

 

As it states Notion of Intended Legal Action. Does this now require a letter by me to be sent to the debt collector?

 

Thanks for any help.

 

 

DCBL DCA Threat-o-gram.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

 

So nothing to worry about.

 

Does a letter before action come from a solicitor acting on behalf of the debt collectors/baliffs then?

 

I understand once a debt is paid (by the dca) it is no longer a debt in law.

 

We have had about four different DCA's write to us over this since the "offence" back in August 2019. Selling it on and hoping we take the bait.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...