Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Savers are pouring money into cash Isas as they look to protect the interest on their nest eggs from tax. They put more than £11bn into cash Isas in April.View the full article
    • The stock ended the trading day at nearly $136, up 3.5%, making it more valuable than Microsoft.View the full article
    • More from the Second Sight guys in the Law Gazette. Post Office Inquiry: Second Sight accountant accuses lawyer of conspiring to pervert course of justice | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Second Sight accountant found compelling evidence in two cases that evidence was withheld, public inquiry is told.  
    • Why have there not been arrests yet? Waiting for the end of an inquiry which seems designed to drag on forever is a feeble excuse "the Post Office “was constantly sabotaging our efforts” to seek the truth and used claims of legal professional privilege – a type of confidentiality which covers legal documents – “to justify withholding documents from us”. "Aujard had said the state-owned body “would not hesitate to take legal action against me” under a “draconian” non-disclosure agreement (NDA)" "Henderson became concerned after reviewing the case file of Jo Hamilton, .. Henderson said the Post Office’s decision to charge Hamilton did not seem to be supported by its own internal security report, and there was evidence that “potentially exculpatory material” had not been disclosed to her at trial or subsequently. “I regarded this as either professional misconduct or, potentially, criminal conduct,” he said."   Horizon IT scandal investigator tells inquiry Post Office was ‘sabotaging our efforts’ | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Ian Henderson, looking into possible miscarriages of justice, said he came to believe he was dealing with ‘a cover-up’  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

N Power Faulty Meter


george_h
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6412 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone point me in the right direction to find out who is responsible for faulty gas meters. My son has recently moved into a rented house and his gas supply is with npower. He thinks his meter is faulty because he has used about £40 of gas in one week with only a cooker and gas fire. N Power say that if he wants his meter checking it will cost him £60 for them to come out. Surely this can't be right when the meter belongs to the gas company anyway.

 

Can they enforce the charge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on - rather than assume the meter is 'faulty' has he kept a log of daily readings to calculate things for himself? Take a daily reading at the same time each day for 7 days, and scale it up for whatever period the bill is for. Calorific values make it difficult to directly relate to units Vs charge, but at least the unit consumption will be easy to check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Buzby, He has started to keep a log and what worried him is that we worked out that he spent £3.40 on gas whilst out at work all day with no heating, gas cooker of gas fire on. N Power at first said he must have a leak but coming home to a house that has been shut up all day then I think a gas leak would have been obvious don't you.

 

As for changing supplier, he can't do that unless he pays up N power but if he does then he may well be paying n power for gas that he hasn't used.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two thoughts on this - (1) Turn everything that consumes gas ON, taking a reading before and after the passage of 5 minutes (all cooker burners, CH, fire etc etc). This consumption figure should be first multiplied by 12 (to get the hourly rate) and again by 7 as an estimate of maximum possible consumption per day. IF the units already consumed are less than that shown for the bill, then there could be a leak - or someone has taken a feed off the pipe AFTER the meter.

 

(2) If this consumption figure is actually more than the the amount Npower require, then it would be fair to assume it IS just standard consumption, and that with gas prices rising anyway, the charge just reflects this.

 

There can be an option to switch to a pre-pay meter, but this should be avoided if at all possible as this brings more problems, and doesn;t resolve the iriginal issue, unless the meter was faulty. Providing the amound owing remains disputed, there should be no adverse action until the myster is resolved, however it might be useful to speak with a neighbour to see if there is a correlation in cost.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there, i worked for npower for over 1 year dealing with meters and accounts, they claim there is a charge of 60 pounds but they only levvy that charge if the meter is actually ok and 9/10 they dont charge. the gas meter belongs to transco and the npower advisor is only a 3rd party however transco wont deal direct with customers any more so unfortunately your stuck with ringing npower if you still have no luck write to the customer complaints dept on the back of the bill and they will get things moving quickly . i would strongly advise leaving npower as they are very very bad.. trust me i left as i didnt want any thing to do with them mind you britsish gas aint too clever either.

STEVE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...