Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Charging order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1925 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had an old credit card which was sold onto a debt collector and they got a CCJ on me 1 month before the debt was statute barred.

I went to court to fight as didn't have no paperwork etc but they won and also got a CCJ

The CCJ was being paid with an attachment of earnings order but due to Ill health I am no longer able to work so all payments stopped over 2.5 years ago.

The DCA never chased at all for the payments after I advised the court I was no longer working.

The CCJ will drop off my credit file in November this year.

The question is now that the original DCA have sold on my debt.

The interim charging order on the house is still in the old DCA name.

I have not acknowledged the new DCA at all.

I want to know how it works now as I'd like to remortgage as the house and Charging order is solely in my name

I dont want to sell olmy home just remortgage without borrowing any more money.

If the charging order is in the old DCA name surely I wont owe them anything if they have now sold the debt and is there a way of getting this removed?

Any help would be appreciated as I'm on an interest only mortgage with now backup to cover the mortgage shortfall.

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues Forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The charge on your home remains until paid/settled with the DCA...its irrelevant the name on the deeds is in the old Judgment Claimant name it can be updated quite easily should the new owner of the Judgment wish to execute further.

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It shouldn't affect a remortgage 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

old DCA name [who has the charge]

new dca name please

I though if the home was solely owned like the debt - then a remortgage had to pay it off?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

True DX but if you remortgage with the same original lender the restriction can be dispensed with....but reading again below

"I want to know how it works now as I'd like to remortgage as the house and Charging order is solely in my name

I dont want to sell my home just remortgage without borrowing any more money."

So there are variants until the OP confirms the above

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes puzzling..hope the OP is not remortgaging to pay off other debts they might not even owe....?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Hillsden was the original dca who obtained ccj and co, the new dca mcs.  they sent a letter last may 2018 and I've not heard a peep since. This is what the letter said

We enclose notice of change of solicitor

The previous owner of this debt, dlc, has assigned your account to our client MEII Ltd.

We have been told that DLC previously issued court proceedings for recovery of the outstanding balance.  Our client has now asked us to deal with this matter. This means we need to send you the attached notice telling you that we are instructed.

This notice has also been sent to the court

There is no actioned needed from you.

That's all the letter said.

Only remortgaging as on interest only at the moment and need to have a repayment mortgage as I have no endowment or any other policy running along side the interest only mortgage.

I have no other debts apart from this CCJ.

Thank you for your help

The debt was an old credit card.

After the CCj and charging order was given by the DCA

Last year I wrote to Lloyd's and TSB as the credit card was a Lloyd's/ TSB when they where one company, and I successfully claimed over 1000 back in PPI, surely if they had sold the debt they would not of let me do that!!

Letter in 2016 from Dlc stating Hillsden had sold my account to MEIII, then a letter in

Letter in October 2017 fro. DlC with client reference MEIII Asking to agree a payment plan or they will take me to court for attachment of earnings, which was already in place before I stopped working.

Letter in may 2018 from Cabot saying my account is moving to Mortimer Clarke who us now taking over my account.

Letter in July 2018 from Mortimer Clarke saying Lloyd's TSB obtained the ccj, but its wasnt Lloyd's it was Hillsden securities who did.  Then the letter goes on on how to repay etc.

Letter end July 2018 from Mortimer Clarke asking me to pay my outstanding balance with Lloyd's tab and to arrange a payment plan.  If I dont contact them in 14 days they may do enforcement action of a charging order or and attachment of earnings and asked me to fill in an income and expenditure, I ignored this, and that's the last I've heard from them.

I'm beginning to wonder now I'd hillsden/DLC really owned the debt from Lloyd's and the new owner of the debt keepnrefering to buying the debt from Lloyds

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let clear things up so its clearer for you.

All those mentioned are part of the cabot group..its not been sold again or passed around anywhere

Hillesden Securities Limited trading as dlc is an Appointed Representative of Cabot Credit Management Group Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with firm reference number 677910. - just another trading name of cabot.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...