Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, thanks.  Jake Burgess is well known to us - and well despised. Friday would be great as then there would be the weekend to tweak things. 👍
    • Thanks FTMDave.  VCS's WS was from Jake Burgess.  I will draft my WS and share with copies of court order, and VCS's exhibits asap.  I'm away tomorrow so more likely Friday.  Thanks again for the advice   
    • Thanks. Time to move on this. 1.  You need to tweak the magnificent WS that dx suggested.  Adapt it to your case.  It should take you about half an hour (I recently wrote a WS from scratch during a train journey which wasn't optimum 😂 with lots of cross referencing and it took me an hour an half, you have one already cooked thanks to dx). 2.  We will add bits to ridicule VCS's WS - it's rich that they moan about your defence being standard when their Particulars of Claim are too and also include the rubbish about keeper/driver that has been criticised numerous times by the courts. 3.  Who wrote their WS?  Was it Mohammed Wali or Ambreen Arshad or have they got someone new? 4.  We need to see a good chunk of VCS's exhibits.  I don't get why we have to keep asking you for things rather than them being volunteered.  Isn't it obvious that we can't help you compile a decent WS if we can't see what the other side is arguing?  All their silly signs aren't needed, but any contract with the landowner is important as are all the photos of your vehicle. 5.  You've never shown us the court order which fixes the hearing date.  It should be obvious we need to see what the court has ordered.  This is the second time we've asked. 6.  VCS were using Elms Legal.  Are Elms Legal still involved? 
    • As per my post above, I believe they are attending - either themselves or a representative on their behalf, as I have not received any notice either by post/email that says otherwise
    • I actually did one better and came to a settlement, didn't cost me a penny. so great result...case closed. Many thanks for your help, much appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accuracy...Can I send a sworn Section 14 Statutory Declaration to the court (or the Historic Debt Team) by recorded deli


Guest Dance Tailor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Dance Tailor

For the sake of accuracy, can stat decs be served by post?

 

It has been stated here on CAG:

 

Can I send a sworn Section 14 Statutory Declaration to the court (or the Historic Debt Team) by recorded delivery?

 

No you cannot...most Magistrates court will reject your application and advise you that you must make an appointment and attend court in person

 

MOJ says:

 

HM Courts & Tribunals Service has not been issued with instructions that a statutory declaration sent by recorded delivery is not acceptable. It is often the case that customers ring in and the information is taken from them and the court staff input this onto the application form for them so that the customer has the form ready for the statutory declaration hearing. However, court staff should accept applications sent by registered or recorded delivery.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that not the reply above ?

 

Please post a copy of the " Reply " and I will check it for approval.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what is written it seems that the SD is indeed an application, there is no requirement to void any previous hearing. As said it must go in front of the court first

 

"so that the customer has the form ready for the statutory declaration hearing."

 

this is contrary to the advice that the previous hearing is void when the SD is just sent.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to post with the attachment now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes please upload the attachment when your ready

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Dance Tailor

Ok, two attachments: the question I asked the MOJ - they had passed it along to the appropriate team. This was the second email I sent as the first reply said they couldn't offer an interpretation of legislation. I explained I wasn't asking for an interpretation. The other attachment is their second reply - as you can see, there has been no instruction given to any court to reject a stat dec by post, as was asserted here.

 

I have asked for clarification on the use of the words 'application' and 'stat dec hearing' as an in-time stat dec doesn't require either, as is clearly stated in the CrPR.

 

This is the first time I've heard that court staff can draft a stat dec over the phone.

HMCTS SD reply.pdf

HMCTS SD question.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, again you seem to be misunderstanding what is said.

 

The SD procedure is a two step process,. First the court has to decide if it accepts the SD(that it is a legitimate out of time application). Next they will set a date and retry the original offence if appropriate.

 

The advice being offered in some quarters is that once the defendant sends the application, stage one is complete the court will void the earlier judgement and the fine, and move onto the re-trial stage.

 

As the response shows, this is not the case. The receipt of the information is only to enable its consideration under section 14.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Dance Tailor

Dodgeball, we're talking about in-time stat decs. The point of discussion was whether you can send one by post - previous advice posted here said this cannot be done. What are your thoughts on that now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dodgeball, we're talking about in-time stat decs. The point of discussion was whether you can send one by post - previous advice posted here said this cannot be done. What are your thoughts on that now?

 

Well previously you were intent on saying there was no such thing as an application, now you should see that the sending of information is indeed an APPLICATION for a later hearing.(not the hearing itself).

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the first time I've heard that court staff can draft a stat dec over the phone.

 

With your own personal role being very limited to simply answering queries on another forum, it is understandable that you would not have heard of court staff 'drafting' (your words not mine) a statutory declaration during a telephone conversation. It is hardly a subject that a defendant would approach a forum for advice on.

 

As somebody who assists defendants daily with these enquiries, I can assure you that court staff have been providing debtors with assistance with these forms for a very long time and hopefully, by doing so, defendants will not face difficulties when they have to attend court to have the case against them re-heard.

 

Assistance from court staff will also avoid defendants from being steered towards online advice recommending that their Statutory Declarations are sent to HMCTS admin centres (such as the Historic Debt Team in Port Talbot). It will also ensure that defendants complete the correct form of Statutory Declaration and not one that has modified for them by another person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry just to add. A court can require a party to attend a hearing under court rules, of course.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Dance Tailor
With your own personal role being very limited to simply answering queries on another forum, it is understandable that you would not have heard of court staff 'drafting' (your words not mine) a statutory declaration during a telephone conversation. It is hardly a subject that a debtor would approach a forum for advice on.

 

As somebody who assists defendants daily with these enquiries, I can assure you that court staff has been providing debtors with assistance with these forms for a very long time and hopefully, by doing so, defendants will have not face difficulties when the case against them is listing for a hearing.

 

Assistance from court staff will also avoid defendants from being steered towards online advice recommending that their Statutory Declarations are sent to HMCTS admin centres (such as the Historic Debt Team in Port Talbot).

 

First time you've ever mentioned it. No thoughts on the 'cannot send a stat dec by post' advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So no comment about stat decs not being accepted by post?

 

The court may well decide that the presence of a party is required at the hearing, section 14 says nothing about it.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Dance Tailor
The court may well decide that the presence of a party is required at the hearing, section 14 says nothing about it.

 

Still no comment on previous advice saying stat decs cannot be sent by post? Remember, HMCTS say:

 

However, court staff should accept applications sent by registered or recorded delivery.
Link to post
Share on other sites

First time you've ever mentioned it.

 

If the question arises from a defendant on this forum on a particular matter, I would answer it but it hasn't done so. When such a question is raised...by a defendant, I will of course respond as I have been doing so for almost 12 years.

 

What I am not here to do is to spend valuable time 'debating' a subject with you. You are merely a contributor on another website. My time is far better served assisting debtors and defendants.

 

PS: It would seem that you copied my response before I had time even finishing drafting it. Once again, here is a copy of my full response (hopefully with spelling errors corrected.

 

With your own personal role being very limited to simply answering queries on another forum, it is understandable that you would not have heard of court staff 'drafting' (your words not mine) a statutory declaration during a telephone conversation. It is hardly a subject that a defendant would approach a forum for advice on.

 

As somebody who assists defendants daily with these enquiries, I can assure you that court staff have been providing debtors with assistance with these forms for a very long time and hopefully, by doing so, defendants will not face difficulties when they have to attend court to have the case against them re-heard.

 

Assistance from court staff will also avoid defendants from being steered towards online advice recommending that their Statutory Declarations are sent to HMCTS admin centres (such as the Historic Debt Team in Port Talbot). It will also ensure that defendants complete the correct form of Statutory Declaration and not one that has modified for them by another person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And that concludes this thread......many thanks for the information uploaded.

 

Thread now closed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...