Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have an agreement with Jacobs to pay 2016-17 council tax, well I did have until they have demanded the balance with in 7 days.

 

My agreement was for £20 per week, in May 17 I asked to reduce this to £60 and pay monthly.

They agreed and confirmed by mail for three months then I would have to pay £80 per month starting in August 17.

 

I have paid may, June, July as agreed but because the July payment was paid in three weekly amounts but the full 60.00 was with them by the agreed date 16th and one extra week towards Augusts payment (my mum actually gave me the money to pay July and the extra 20.00)

 

 

they sent me letter saying I have broken my weekly arrangement therefore full balance due.

I sent three emails which reminded them of the new monthly agreement and payment was not due until 16th August 17,

I finally got a response today,

 

 

which I find quite rude, it states::

 

""You did not pay your account as we agreed and you have been making your payments sporadically which we do not allow as we are not able to monitor your case.

 

You have not maintained your original arrangement, nor have you maintained the weekly arrangement which we set to cater for your incoming payments.

 

You are not able to decide when you are paying parts of your arrangement nor are you able to pay £20.00 and then reduce your payment for that month without having this confirmed by a member of our team.

 

If you are having issues you are advised to contact our office before your arrangement defaults and we will look into your account and endeavour to assist you in the best way we can.""

 

IT THEN IGNORES WHAT IS STATED ABOVE AND THE FINAL PARAGRAPH SAYS::

 

"All of the above is stated in the arrangement terms and conditions which we have provided to you upon setting your arrangement.

Unfortunately as your arrangement has defaulted for a third time we have no other option but to insist that your remaining balance of £433.00 is paid in full within the next 7 days, We have attached a list of all of our payment methods for your perusal.

 

I have paid on time I have proof.

 

I have not made the payments as they state apart from the July one which wad sent over in weekly amounts but on time.

 

This agreement has not defaulted previously, I had a previous one that did but that's all paid up.

 

The reply email does not make sense,

 

 

Can they demand the full balance like this when I have paid what was due.

 

if I wanted to pay an extra amount to reduce the balance,

I would have to ask permission first as they state I can't decide when to pay them.

surely paying them is the main priority.

 

Please advise me what if any can I do to stop them adding fees and sending their enforcement officer to take goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

State that you do not have any savings and cannot borrow £400+ so a visit will achieve nothing, other than to increase a debt that you are already struggling to pay off. Furthermore, there appears no justification in cancelling an agreement that you have adhered to, other than a way for Jacobs to manufacture a reason to add £235 to the debt.

 

They will still likely want to visit to confirm the circumstances.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Please advise me what if any can I do to stop them adding fees and sending their enforcement officer to take goods.

 

In the first instance, you need to be aware that a payment arrangement is not a legal right but a concession. If a payment arrangement is agreed and then defaults, then the account can indeed progress to the enforcement stage (where a visit of £235 may be applied. Because you had not paid in accordance with the agreement, your account would have been flagged by Jacob's computer system as having defaulted. However, the position appears to be that the amount that was agreed to be paid by a certain date has been adhered to.

 

You say that you disagree that you had not defaulted on three occasions as suggested by Jacobs. Are these payments for the month of July (when your payments seemed to change) or earlier?

 

Given the amount of the debt, I am assuming that your payment arrangement had been set up on receipt of the Notice of Enforcement. Is this correct?

 

PS: Until this matter is resolved, you need to be aware that any vehicle that you have outside of your home is at risk of being seized.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they will - The point is that they are trying to manufacture a reason for visiting. The OP has not defaulted so there is no excuse to visit.

 

From what I read the OP has indeed "defaulted". in that he has failed to adhere to the stated payment arrangement. The word default does not only refer to the money, but also the method of payment, but f course you know this.

 

There is no question of anyone "manufacturing" anything, Their systems will be set to watch for your payments as you agreed to make them, and will register a default if they do not arrive on time.

I think it should be noted that this is a debt you are required to pay, and not some shopping account with Littlewoods.

 

I should contact the bailiff, apologize humbly and ask for the account to be set back to that agreed previously, Guarantee that this was an error, yes point out that the sum was in fact paid although admittedly not at the right time, and ensure them it will not happen again.

 

As for making a complaint, forget it no one has done anything wrong, except you.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...