Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Black Horse/Skye Charges


francoe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Sounds like you've received a complaint acknowledgement, you'll get a final response letter within eight weeks of your complaint being made.

 

Why would you jump to MCOL following that? They have acknowledged your complaint and refusing to wait on an outcome would probably be in breach of pre-action protocol.

 

The fees look excessive so Black Horse may offer to refund the fees, although if you were in arrears they probably won't refund all of them.

 

How much they refund will likely depend on your account conduct, if you were in arrears for an extended period (your posts indicate a multi-year period?) then there may genuinely have been quite high costs associated with the management of your account.

 

Also noteworthy is that Skye reference deferred interest, have you queried that or were you aware that interest had been deferred? That would probably explain why the loan balance didn't match up with the terms of the original agreement, you did also go into arrears so likely also incurred further interest on that arrears balance.

 

It may have been interest on the arrears that they deferred, if they capitalised it without your knowledge or consent that's probably worth looking at.

 

Either way just wait on the complaint outcome, trying to go via MCOL straight off the bat is not a good approach. If you do decide to go down that route I recommend reading the pre-action requirements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update required after post from Nihilus

 

I did not send out the LBA because of the reply I received from Black Horse(which is attached)

 

I did not send LBA because of the wording of there reply but because it was close to resolving the issue of the fees.

The only problem I need to resolve with Black Horse is the amount they say I have paid, up to the point of transfer to Skye loans as they have missed a payment.Once I have finalised the transferred balance I can then continue with Skye loans as this would make anything Skye Loans are quoting totally wrong.

 

The outset of the original post was to get the charges refunded, the over payment and for a zero balance, account closed and finished with.

 

So you see once I can resolve the missing payment issue and agree the transferred balance I can continue with Skye as Black Horse are only dealing with it up to the transfer point.

 

Hope this make sense but I thought it was moving towards our aim.

Thanks

black horse decesion reverse forum.jpg

black horse decesion forum.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's nice, congrats on getting the fees waived!

I love the wording in their letter as well :lol:

"We admit no fault, but here's all of those fees back."

Sounds like they were applying them without actually doing any collections work :madgrin:

 

So this missing payment, have they definitely missed a payment or is it just that you made all the payments under the original contract terms and think the balance should be £0.00?

 

Because if it's just the balance not lining up with what you expect based on the credit agreement then I think they may have answered that question when they reference additional interest.

 

Similarly Skye alluded to this earlier when they mentioned deferred interest,

it looks like both companies worded it pretty badly and didn't really explain anything very well

but the balance took longer to clear than stated in the credit agreement due to interest incurred on your arrears.

 

This would have either slowed down the rate of capital reduction or been added to your default balance,

depending on how Black Horse applied the interest arrears.

 

If I've misunderstood and they just missed a payment and it isn't showing on your account,

do you know the date of said payment?

Should be pretty easy to evidence with bank statements/Black Horse statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I can understand what you are saying if we where quoting balances regarding interest.

 

Quoting from the letter and all charges aside

 

"Having calculated the balance that was with Black Horse (no balance figure quoted)

I can confirm that you made payments totaling £22,2532.32(actual monies received regardless of when)

 

Your agreement states that in order to to complete your obligation you are required to make a minimum amount of £25,053.40.

 

 

If an arrears balance accrues on the account the total amount payable will adjust to reflect this as additional interest will become payable

no mention of whether there was or that it did and no figure quoted)"

 

I made my calculations based on original & copy statements to track payments made.

I also last night went through all bank statements to cross check payments whether made by CHQ/DD or POS.

My payment total amounts to sum of £22,832.32 , that is a difference of exactly £300.00.

 

 

I found a payment made to Black Horse on the 15/12/2010 by POS.

 

We can not talk about interest accruing on arrears until the wording of the letter is changed.

Is this correct or am I getting something wrong?

Thank you

 

Sorry, edit to post

The payment that was made on 15/12/2010 by POS was exactly £300.00

 

based on calculations

 

Black Horse confirmed payments received £22,532.32

 

My actual payments made £22,832.32

 

there is a payment made by me from my bank which is missing of £300.00

 

as far as I understand thats before we start talking about balances

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...