Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Austerity is just a con..


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3076 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Isn't it odd that in the EU countries like Germany who are social democrat (ish) by nature insist on the like of Greece following the direction of the world bank and the Washington consensus of liberalise , privatise and reduce the role of the state .

All because The U.S.A contribute most to the world bank and the IMF and therefore in reality control what it does

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Austerity will never work, because although you will see the deficit number reducing, you get into a vicious circle of cutting to deal with issues it creates. If you don't spend money on roads for example you get increased traffic and that means you hit productivity. NHS has seen spending rise insufficient to cover all costs, therefore many Hospitals are in debt, which will need to be dealt with. Councils receive less money e.g care budget cut therefore more older people staying longer in hospital, costing the NHS.

 

Most of the debt has been added by coalition and Tories. When Labour left office in 2010, the debt was about £590 billion and the economy was growing. It now stands at £1600 billion, after the first 3 years of the coalition had very little growth.

 

Had the coaltion made investments straight away in getting houses built and other infrastructure projects started, i think we would be in a much better position. Some cuts would have been needed, but some tax increases would have been needed as well. The Tories decided on mostly spending cuts and some tax reductiions, hoping to see consumer spending increase. But the austerity has caused lower real term wages and consumers have cut back. Therefore business makes less profit and pays less tax.

 

When business profits are being challenged it is not just the business tax that is affected, businesses either reuduces pay or limits pay rises which in turn reduces the income tax revenue , as fixed costs go up there is less money for consumers to spend so less vat paid and reduced business profit, the cycle continues

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

That has to be the silliest and most selfish post on the whole forum.

 

I am hurt. I thought I held that honour. I must try harder.

 

In support of BB we should work to live but with capitalism we sre required to live to work, unless we are the bourgeoisie when we can sit on our million a week yatchs and spend 10k on a dinner party when water aid are asking the ordinary people for £3 to stop people dieing

  • Haha 1

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sad! person.

No ambition and no interests, other than in himself,

:-(

 

Well I for one have an ambition to make the world a more egalitarian place where people all have enough food to eat and enough clean water . How any capitalist can sleep at night is beyond me when they know that they are getting richer on the backs of the workers in, for example China and Bangladesh

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...