Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dunno you've not scanned up what you've had before how can we tell?  
    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Goose vs Woolwich


goose1234
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, this is my 1st post of many to come I imagine. After speaking to my friend who has recently succesfully claimed all (over £900) of his bank charges against HSBC with almost no bother at all, I have today sent the fist letter to the Woolwich requesting all of the bank statements for the last 6 years. I suspect my claim is going to be around the 4,000 to £5,000 mark so its got to be worthwhile. My friends final letter from HSBC with the cheque actually stated on it that it was cheaper to settle then to go to court (maybe if its under £1000) of which they would have won if it had................ I have sent my letter to the follwing address, does anyone know if this is correct?

 

The Woolwich

Woolwich telephony customer relations

27 Station Road

Clacton-on-Sea

Essex

CO15 1TD

Many thanks and speak to you soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my first letter to Clacton too, seemed to work. LAthough subsequent letters from woolwich/barclays have come from all over the country! You'll end up at the london Churchill Place address once they realise you mean business :)

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi goose1234,

I to am hammering woolwich(barclays), all my correspondence from them came from Barclays,freepost rlta-csue-tchc,head office customer relations,london,e14 5hp. I am sure your first letter will get there but in future you may find it better to post to that address. Good luck, hope this is of some help.My claim is for £4700 and they are taking it as far as they dare so be cool and dont let them intimidate you.

from

 

thewoolwicharejustaloadof

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi goose

they wont try to close your account yet but when you get your money they may.So if I was you i wouldopen another account just in case.

In theory they shouldnt because that breaks the banking code i believe, but hey they take money from you that they shouldnt. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that the woolwicharejustaloadof, well its been a week since the request of charges and still no communication, but the general posts on this sites are very simular. If I do not hear after the 4 weeks since posting the request do I phone or write again (so I have copies)? And if I do mail, do I send it on the third week prior to the deadline? Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Goose

as i understand it they have 40 days to send you your statements. They cannot charge you more than £10.If you did not send your letter recorded delivery they could claim they have not received it. So it may be worth sending them a reminder, informing them of the date by which you expect to get the information you requested. Make sure you send this one recorded delivery.

I know from speaking to other people on other sites such as this, that unrecorded mail has a habit of dissapearing.

You must bare in mind that they will try to hang on to your money as long as they can, so be patient but persistent and you will get what is rightfully yours eventually.

I am waiting for the court to send me a date for the hearing, which seems to be happening more often than not these days.

Keep at it Goose:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, looks like the address was correct and have received an acknowledgement, but that is exactly what it was, they have said that they will be back to me within 14 days but have thanked me for my enquiry and that they value my comments. My pleasure.......Will update soon when I gety feedback

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, Summary received but I think I must have been a bit over exited when I quoted £4000. It has actually came back 1 a single 1 pager summary at over £1700. Still not a bad amount. Anyway, the 2nd letter is in the post winging its way over as we speak. Will keep you posted. Now its starting to all happen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone, as I mentioned in the earlier post the 2nd letter is now on its way, but am growing more and more concerned about a few things

 

1. Woolwich freezing my account

2. Woolwich serving a default against me

3. Woolwich closing my account

3. My overdraft with the woolwich being demanded back

 

My question is: as I am in the flow of things at the moment, is it best for me to go all the way to the court demanding that no defaults are served and can the FOS do anything about them closing my account and if they can, can they do it quickly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goose contact a mod as far as im aware the woolwich cant do anything with your account while its in dispute also your default removal can be made part of your settlement , having read numerous threads i didnt think the woolwich were reverting to these bullyboy tactics !

if my advice has been of any help to you then please click the scales ! Thank you :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paddy, thanks for your help, I think you read some things on the threads which make you really confident, and then you read just one negative and it seems to throw it all in the air again. But I think the general trend is to stick to your guns and all will be OK. Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, my 2nd letter with total amount was sent on the 23rd November and today I have received a reply. It is a standerd letter saying that they are sorry I am disatisfied but they will resolve the matter by the 28 December and its not even signed (its a photocopy signature). Do I wait and give them the opportunioty to respond or send the LBA 14 days from the 23rd (when the 2nd letter was sent)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the LBA 14 days after the prelim.

 

This is all part of the woolwich's delaying tactics, make them work to your timetable, not the other way around. if you let them dictate the timescales they will string you along for years with you never getting anywhere!

 

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goose you stick to your timescales not theirs these are all stalling tactics used by the woolwich let them know your serious your in control !

if my advice has been of any help to you then please click the scales ! Thank you :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...