Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi mate Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only question I've got is will I be contacted by the police and will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
    • I thought Delinquent ment "missing payments" its active so assumimg it can be seen ? also this is the only thing change on my credit file and that in its self being re added has dropped my credit score . the debt is SB and did drop off my credit file so how have or how can they re add it again ?
    • ah sorry delinquent means it dead so not hurting your file. dx  
    • Hello Dx , its been awhile hope you are ok ? I didnt think it was ment to be back on there ! I dont understand why its not saying default but now Delinquent instead. This is what i see Now on my credit file   Account detail Vodafone Ltd Currently open Current balance £117   OVERVIEW Account type Multi Communications Status Delinquent Account number **************7370 Last updated 31 May 2024 Start date 30 Apr 2015    
    • The campaigner had travelled to hear former CEO Paula Vennells give evidence when he received the news.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HMRC (alleged) debt - please advise


ChargeBlaster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3263 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last year, HMRC (quite rightly) sent demands to me stating that I needed to complete tax returns going back to 2008/9 and 2009/10.

 

These were completed (by my accountant). One of these years showed a loss of c£20,000. The returns were submitted to HMRC, along with other more recent tax returns.

 

HMRC then notified me that these specific returns for the years mentioned above, are 'time barred', and cannot be used to calculate tax owing. They consequently hit me with a £26,000 tax bill.

 

All the advice I read at the time, and HMRC's own advice by telephone, suggested that I should make a payment arrangement first, argue the toss second - which is what I did. I subsequently set up a payment arrangement of £500 per month, which I could afford at the time.

 

I subsequently sent to HMRC a SAR, to include transcripts of all telephone conversations, in order that I could determine what they'd told me - with a view to compelling them to take into account the loss on my accounts of £20,000. On 11 May, I received an email from them to confirm receipt of the SAR, pointing out that they had 40 days with which to comply with the SAR.

 

Needless to say, 40 days expired on 20 June 2015, and nothing has been heard from HMRC. So I can't challenge the debt as I evidence upon which I might rely is being withheld.

 

My financial circumstances have now changed to the extent that I can no longer afford £500 per month - on a debt that I can't challenge.

 

SOOOOOO.....What options do I have?

 

1. How can I hold HMRC responsible for not complying with their legal requirement under the DP ACT to respond to the SAR within 40 days?

 

2. Can / should I stop the repayment based on 1. above?

 

3. Regardless of 1 and 2 above, I can no longer afford £500pm.....

 

Any advice and guidance would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. How can I hold HMRC responsible for not complying with their legal requirement under the DP ACT to respond to the SAR within 40 days?

 

Write to HMRC and point out they are in breach of their statuary obligations under the DPA.

 

Make a formal complaint to the ICO and get them to put pressure on HMRC.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last year, HMRC (quite rightly) sent demands to me stating that I needed to complete tax returns going back to 2008/9 and 2009/10.

 

These were completed (by my accountant). One of these years showed a loss of c£20,000. The returns were submitted to HMRC, along with other more recent tax returns.

 

HMRC then notified me that these specific returns for the years mentioned above, are 'time barred', and cannot be used to calculate tax owing. They consequently hit me with a £26,000 tax bill.

 

All the advice I read at the time, and HMRC's own advice by telephone, suggested that I should make a payment arrangement first, argue the toss second - which is what I did. I subsequently set up a payment arrangement of £500 per month, which I could afford at the time.

 

I subsequently sent to HMRC a SAR, to include transcripts of all telephone conversations, in order that I could determine what they'd told me - with a view to compelling them to take into account the loss on my accounts of £20,000. On 11 May, I received an email from them to confirm receipt of the SAR, pointing out that they had 40 days with which to comply with the SAR.

 

Needless to say, 40 days expired on 20 June 2015, and nothing has been heard from HMRC. So I can't challenge the debt as I evidence upon which I might rely is being withheld.

 

My financial circumstances have now changed to the extent that I can no longer afford £500 per month - on a debt that I can't challenge.

 

SOOOOOO.....What options do I have?

 

1. How can I hold HMRC responsible for not complying with their legal requirement under the DP ACT to respond to the SAR within 40 days?

 

2. Can / should I stop the repayment based on 1. above?

 

3. Regardless of 1 and 2 above, I can no longer afford £500pm.....

 

Any advice and guidance would be much appreciated.

 

Just to clarify :

"HMRC then notified me that these specific returns for the years mentioned above, are 'time barred', and cannot be used to calculate tax owing. They consequently hit me with a £26,000 tax bill."

 

Is the £26k bill based on a "determination", and if so when was that determination first made?

 

Do HMRC state (or does your accountant believe) that you were previously asked to submit returns?

Had you had any "late filing penalties" that would mean you would have been aware a return was overdue?

(These would influence when the "filing date" for these returns should have been)

 

IF this does relate to determinations, I've previously posted about determinations, when they become "fixed", appeals, and "Special Relief" in my post of 31st January 2015 to the thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?440393-HMRC-harassment&p=4683974#post4683974

 

Did your accountant comment last year on the 26k bill, and if it could be appealed?

When last year was it, was it over a year ago (as you can't appeal a determination later than a year after it was made, if it was made more than 2 years after the filing date of the return)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bazza

 

Thank you for your prompt response. I will look into the paperwork, and try to get the answers to your questions.

 

Am I looking for the word "determination" in the correspondence from HMRC, given the importance you appear to be attaching to the word?

 

BTW, I can't get the link in your post to work....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bazza

 

Thank you for your prompt response. I will look into the paperwork, and try to get the answers to your questions.

 

Am I looking for the word "determination" in the correspondence from HMRC, given the importance you appear to be attaching to the word?

 

BTW, I can't get the link in your post to work....

 

They were described as "determinations" by HMRC when I helped my friend some years back.

 

Trying that link again :

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?440393-HMRC-harassment&p=4683974#post4683974

 

Don't forget CAG sometimes adds spaces to URL's, so it may be worth Copying & Pasting it, deleting any spaces and then trying it?

Or, hitting "reply" and copying it from that text, where it may show without added spaces?

 

 

From that thread, that OP noted that HMRC's statement included (for example) "05/04/08 SA Determination, Tax £600, Interest to 20/01/15 £106.31", so in 2008 they were still referring to them as determinations, and using that term in statements sent Jan 2015.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...