Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

...and another one (annoyed abbey customer)


povski
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6379 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

as advised elsewhere this is the place for me to post regarding my abbey experience.

-----------------------

Hi - first post here - hello fellow disgruntled citizens of rip-off britain.

 

I am keen to claim back my bank charges and copied a letter from a tmeplate found on this site. This was to request all actions on my account. Abbey have responded by cashing my £10 cheque and sending me the last years worth of statements. This is no good as the charges were incurred about four years ago. Are they taking the P or is this all they are bound to provide.

--------------------------

the above was my initial post - i see from further reading here that this is how abbey conduct themselves. i think i'd better start doing a bit of research into how this works. i haven't been so filled with moral indignation since my war with powergen (wanted £1000 refunded, got £400). must do better.

 

regards - pov

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are taking the P- You probably would have received the microfiche letter. Have a look in the bank template library for the next letter to send to Abbey.

 

Also, have a read at a few of the posts in this forum to see what Abbey does when you ask for your money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its important that if they dont supply all your data in the 40 days that you complain to the ICO.

 

Following the ICO s visit and recent decision about thier records they have been telling the ICO that theyre being good and supplying everything as they should

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

i called them today on the english number. the first person i spoke to told me that the admin departments number was the overseas call centre number and then put me through to them.the second person told me that they had new phones and there was confusion. he said that they only keep a year in electronic and the rest is microfiche. i believe i may have heard that word on this site a time or two. he also said due to the volume of requests they had a backlog directly related to people claiming charges refunds. i said to him that i believed that the data protction act applied to abbey and that they still had to give me the info in 40 days. i then made dark threats about what i would do if i dont get the stuff within the time. trouble is, i dont remember when i posted the letter that began the 40 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And proof of posting/delivery too

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

found my copy of the letter - 12th October it was posted - i don't have proof of postage having sent it via normal post. i don't see how that can be an issue as they have already partially responded meaing they can't say that they never received the request (i hope the world is not so corrupt that they could) i will wait until the 40 days passes and then take it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

found my copy of the letter - 12th October it was posted - i don't have proof of postage having sent it via normal post. i don't see how that can be an issue as they have already partially responded meaing they can't say that they never received the request (i hope the world is not so corrupt that they could) i will wait until the 40 days passes and then take it further.

 

Good point

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - got the photocopies from abbey (early!!! - i must have scared them). couple of questions at this point.

 

1) there appear to be 4 types of charge (unpaid dd, unpaid cheque, cleared transaction and unauthorised od). can i claim for all of them?

 

2) if they are going to close my account how much notice do they have to give me?

 

3) assuming worst case (the glass is generally half-empty in my world) and i go to court and lose - what would i be looking at that costing in legal fees etc. i've paid a bit over £900 in charges in the last 6 years to these crooks and am happy to follow this to its conclusion but i would like to know the possible financial implications.

 

thanks for any advice given

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...