Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received an email from town and country on behalf of everday loans. I assume I don’t reply to the email?   Any advice appreciated 
    • Hello, my name is Chris and aswell as saying hello, am checking my posts pop out nicely.  I have  an ongoing problem with British Gas(which shouldn't have become a problem at all), which has cannonballed into recently involving the Energy Ombudsman, Ofgem and I even, hasten to add our government because I am at wit's end. I have a couple of questions. What I write is likely to be mammoth size, I really would like to indicate why I am at wit's end, and as far as I am concerned (conjecture and opinion) it's an indication of the inadequacy of our country's system that since and including John Major has been deliberately brought in to be such. Anyway hello and my 2 questions are 'Can I post photos and if so how, are there any instructions?'  and secondly,  'To what extent can I mention names in what I post, first names only, second names? only, both allowed where known? quoting or gist acceptable, do I need to even though its case and should be anyway, state it's a truthful and honest account?'  It's been ongoing for over a year now on something which I am guessing should get sorted in maybe a month for most people, and I would actually like to go into fuller details than I've even said to them because I feel its important you know that I HAVE been significantly hindered and am living under that still as I speak/type. 
    • Well, Have we all got our piccy id ready to start taking out the Tories err Trash in the locals?
    • Thank you, I’m wary about calling ask know bullying tactics wilL start. I’m happy to write to them.  I will see what happens when we visit the garage. 
    • Hi DX, Glad to see you’re still around 😊 The keeper and driver have had no contact with any company regarding this.    Seeing as this is the second DCA involved, wouldn’t it open a can of worms by getting in touch with them?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sarah Vs Abbey - Help please


Stevie1961
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6382 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

Sorry for the large thread but I am helping my wife sort out her account with Abbey and thought it best to give the whole story so far. After Abbey giving her three weeks notice that they were withdrawing her 6 year old overdraft of £1450 and wondering what she was going to do, I was lucky enough to find your site and so it started!!

 

She had found most of her bank statements and requested others from Abbey. Finally, all that was outstanding was 2004. After reading the articles on here and seeing the delays that Abbeys were making, we decided to send letter one (by recorded delivery) asking for the refund and attached the schedule of charges. The letter was amended to say that the schedule did not include any charges for the 2004 period as she was still waiting copy statements from them. The total amount, with interest, came to £3,569.63. A standard letter came back dated 9th October stating that her "complaint" was being investigated!

 

On 18th October, she checked her bank account and £665 had been paid into her account under misc fee refund. The next day a letter was received from the Abbey (seems to be another standard letter) stating that the charges do not contravene the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999 and were offering a GOGW for £713.00. We responded that day by refusing their offer of goodwill and confirmed that she still required full repayment of the bank charges and that so far, as a gesture of goodwill on her part, was not pursing the charges for 2004 which came to over £800 (the statements arrived two days before the money was paid into her account) Daft maybe I know but the deadline for her overdraft was Nov 1st! We are now at the point where we are going to file a moneyclaim form but she needs to check a few details first.

 

Can we send them a revised schedule of charges (No 2) that now include 2004's charges, withdrawing HER offer of goodwill and giving them 7 days to respond before we apply to the courts or do we have to continue with the original amount that we advised them of in October? :confused: She is getting really nervous now and wants to make sure she hasn't made any mistakes! Oh and she has already opened another account just to be on the safe side.

 

Thanks for your help

Stevie

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that you can send them the new list of charges. This would be different if you had already filed with MCOL but you haven't yet. Think you have to give them 14 days to respond. Would check with someone else though just to be sure.

 

Don't be nervous. I was a bit like you, but quickly realised that there is always someone here to help or has gone through the same thing. Don't forget everyone posting here is on the same side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have made a gesture of goodwill previously and now you wish to withdraw it, personally i would send a new LBA/schedule and give them 14 days.

 

I don't think there is anything i could point to and say this is mandatory but it seems to me that the withdrawal of the goodwill offer on your part is quite a fundamental shift and so i would give them a chance to reconsider.

 

I doubt that it will make one iota of a difference so don't expect them to capitulate.

 

Anyway if it did get to court at least you could show you acted in good faith.

 

Finally the only thing you need to worry about is making sure you give them a chance to give you the money back and can show that you have acted reasonably.

 

Sounds to me like your going the right way, you route might be slightly different to mine but its on the same lines.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening

 

Quick update and advice. My wife sent off the LBA letter yesterday but has received the following letter today (looks like it has crossed in the post!)

 

"Thank you for your letter dated 19th October 2006 about your bank charges and I apologise for the delay in replying.

 

I am sorry you are unhappy with my response dated 13th October 2006.

 

As stated in my earlier letter, I can assure you the charges do not contravene any Consumer Contracts Regulations, therefore I cannot agree to refund anything more in addition to the £713.00 already credited to your account. This money was paid as a gesture of goodwill, and acceptance of this will in no way affect any further action you may decide to take.

 

I am sorry we have not been able to reach a final agreement. As explained in my previous letter, if you remain unhappy, you could refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). I genuinely believe my decision is fair and reasonable. The FOS is there to look at complaints impartially. They will make what they believe to be a fair and balanced decision, based only on the facts of each individual case.

 

Yours sincerely

Ian Marshall"

 

I have just spent the afternoon and evening search through the past threads to see if this is a standard reply and am unable to find anything. Can anyone advise if they have received this response from SHabbey and what happened in their case??

 

She is fully prepared to go onto Moneyclaim if there is no response from her latest LBA letter.

 

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

Stevie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stevie

 

Its a standard response dont worry wait 14 days then issue your claim

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...