Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GR Finance, help needed with arrears and collection techniques


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Just wanted a bit of help for my daughter if possible.

 

She's a single parent on benefits, and unbeknown to me, she took a couple of doorstep loans out with a company called GR Finance Ltd.

 

Now, she's having trouble paying them. This isn't enitirely her fault, although she should accept much of the blame.

 

She missed a payment before Christmas, but paid it a few days later by debit card.

Then the company tried to take the following weeks payment + the missed payment by direct debit (I believe)

which bounced due to the extra amount being taken that she wasn't aware of.

She then got a bank charge, which left her short and so on.

 

they were charging her card under a CPA and there were bits of money coming out of her account all over the place

she asked for a statement of exactly what had been paid etc, and said she wouldn't pay any more until she got it.

 

She got a spreadsheet on excel which she couldn't make head nor tail of, and nor could I,

She asked them for something straighforward, showing payment dates, and balances,

but they said that was all they would give her. Since then she hasn't paid anything.

 

They are constantly ringing and texting her, and have spoken to her mother, who doesn't even live with her,

regarding her debt and missed payments, which they had no authority to do.

 

She can't afford the £20 a week, and should never have taken the loans out, which is her fault,

but if they had done proper affordability checks, they shouldn't have granted her any loans either, certainly not the second one,

 

She has tried to offer them a lower payment and asked they freeze the interest, but they point blank refuse to accept anything lower, and would not give her an address to write to (which I see has happened before from another thread on here).

 

Today she got the letter attached,

seems completely unprofessional to me,

no company number, no CCL number,

and when I've searched the company name is actually G R Finance not GR Finance as shown on the letter.

 

The letter also makes it sound as though she will be facing a criminal court, stating 'if you are found guilty' surely that can't be legal?

 

got any advice on what to do,

not just on how to go about making an offer of lower payment (now she has an address)

but how to respond to the letter and if she has grounds for complaint to anyone about it?

 

Only things I've done to the letter is remove personal information.

 

Many thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont be criminal it would be civil

 

 

cant find them at all on FCA register?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont be criminal it would be civil

 

 

cant find them at all on FCA register?

 

 

dx

 

I did, eventually, you have to put a space between the G and R.

 

What do you think of the letter?

 

 

Stuff like if you are found guilty, this is your last chance, further delay will not be tolerated, that type of thing.

Do they not have to put the company number on the letter?

 

I know it would be civil, what I meant was, by putting

'if you are found guilty' it makes it sound as though it would be a criminal case,

for someone who doesn't know better that could be to scare them,

 

you wouldn't get a guilty or not guilty verdict in a moneyclaim case would you,

so to me, thats been put in intentionally into scaring someone into paying up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

has anything else happened

 

 

I'd be sending them an sar I think

 

 

somethings not right

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How strange, I could have sworn I posted on here at the weekend.

 

 

No nothing really, just constant texts and phone calls.

 

 

I believe the collectors been to the door too.

 

 

Any advice on was of stopping the constant calls & visits?

 

 

Is there a template to do a SAR?

 

Thanks for the replies :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you did post

I tidied them up.

 

 

click the SAR link here your post or my past posts

 

 

pers I'd get it moving.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...