Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Property, not habitable, at commencement, of tenancy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3570 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Looking for advice on this tricky subject.

 

 

Basically our 5 young people moved into a multi-occupancy house on 15th August, and I am one of 5 parent guarantors.

 

 

There were several problems with the property when we arrived to take up occupancy on Sunday 24th.

 

  • There were only 2 bunches of keys immediately available (not 5) and the front door locks are faulty needing work.
  • One room was still being treated for damp and the work has not been completed
  • The garden at the rear of the house was requiring a lot of work and was cluttered with dangerous obstacles. This still needs attention. One fence needs raising but in the meantime a dog has come through that fence and bitten one of the young people who went to A&E and reported incident to police.
  • We have not been given an inventory and have not been given a valid gas or electricity certificate or a fire plan assessment. There is a smoke alarm downstairs only which appears broken with no evidence of having been tested.

The landlord has made some efforts since the tenancy started - ordered new mattresses on request and had the house cleaned (albeit both things to a substandard).

We have written to appeal that we be refunded the rent paid for 14th August to 1st September but the landlord has declined saying that the house met all statutory requirements.

The landlord is prepared to continue the necessary repairs at his pace, which we are happy with, but the quality may be an issue.

 

 

We have all photographic evidence and written correspondence throughout.

 

 

We are lacking the necessary legal expertise to determine what rights we have in this situation and wondered if anyone out there might be able to advise or direct us.

 

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking for advice on this tricky subject.

 

 

Basically our 5 young people moved into a multi-occupancy house on 15th August, and I am one of 5 parent guarantors.

 

 

There were several problems with the property when we arrived to take up occupancy on Sunday 24th.

 

 

  • There were only 2 bunches of keys immediately available (not 5) and the front door locks are faulty needing work.
  • One room was still being treated for damp and the work has not been completed
  • The garden at the rear of the house was requiring a lot of work and was cluttered with dangerous obstacles. This still needs attention. One fence needs raising but in the meantime a dog has come through that fence and bitten one of the young people who went to A&E and reported incident to police.
  • We have not been given an inventory and have not been given a valid gas or electricity certificate or a fire plan assessment. There is a smoke alarm downstairs only which appears broken with no evidence of having been tested.

 

The landlord has made some efforts since the tenancy started - ordered new mattresses on request and had the house cleaned (albeit both things to a substandard).

We have written to appeal that we be refunded the rent paid for 14th August to 1st September but the landlord has declined saying that the house met all statutory requirements.

The landlord is prepared to continue the necessary repairs at his pace, which we are happy with, but the quality may be an issue.

 

 

We have all photographic evidence and written correspondence throughout.

 

 

We are lacking the necessary legal expertise to determine what rights we have in this situation and wondered if anyone out there might be able to advise or direct us.

 

 

Cheers

 

 

 

 

The Local Authority Housing Department is responsible for checking and ensuring Landlords of HMOs comply with all the regulations regarding the standard of properties including the gas and electricity safety check.

 

 

You can request that an HO comes out to check the property, the officer can compel the LL to complete all required works.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this Brigadier

We are aware about this possibility and may pursue this.

We are especially questioning if we should make a stand about the rent we have paid when the house was not properly ready.

Thanks

 

 

 

You can request that an HO comes out to check the property, the officer can compel the LL to complete all required works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this Brigadier

We are aware about this possibility and may pursue this.

We are especially questioning if we should make a stand about the rent we have paid when the house was not properly ready.

Thanks

 

You can request that an HO comes out to check the property, the officer can compel the LL to complete all required works.

 

 

 

Yes definitely make a stand the LL can't expect rent for an uninhabitable property.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...