Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI Reclaiming Process - halifax card & Loans


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3529 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

Just wondering if the SAR template on the sticky section is still useable (as it was written in 2007)

 

i have a Credit Card with Halifax which to be honest ive only just realised the extent of the PPI im paying :(

 

i have also held two loans with Halifax previously which are now both closed.

 

So would i be best to write to them asking for an SAR first?

 

or using one of the PPI templates (along with the questionaire) first?

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I personally would use the full SAR template in the CAG library here....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387306-Full-Subject-Access-Request(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

When you have all of the data available you can then work out what you may be due back.

 

The process to reclaim is to complete a fos questionnaire and submit it to the lender with a brief covering letter. They will then have 8 weeks to investigate and give you a final decision.

 

While there is no requirement to send a spreadsheet of claim with the complaint letter, it won't hurt to do so.

 

Preparing your own figures will help you to establish whether any offer the lender makes is correct or whether they are pulling the wool over your eyes still.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've now got my template letter that im happy with, had to ring halifax to ask about the addess as i wanted the letter to get to the specific place it needed to.

 

if there is anyone else who has dealt with Halifax in the matter, can you please confirm that HBOS, DSAR POBOX 791 Leeds, LS1 9LR.

 

Also, the lady on the phone stated that the money HAD to be sent by check, not a postal order or other method, not being about able to find my cheque book i was hoping this isnt true, can anyone help?

 

 

I apologise for all the questions, i admit to being completely clueless on all matters relating to debt and will be relient on the knowledge of the people on here for a while i think :(

 

Many thanks again.

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I always send a SAR to the Registered Office and by some trackable method so that you know when they get it.

 

Postal Orders should be fine...they are legitimate tender. Don't know why you were told it HAD to be by cheque.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, so to stop myself getting into any more issues, i tried ringing Halifax to get the Repayment cover to stop immediately, the rather rude woman was more interested in telling me i needed to make a payment as my account was incurring charges (for going over the credit limit) asking me if i was in financial trouble, she then told me i was going to get a lot of calls and letters if i didnt make a payment right there and then.

 

then she gave me a number for the repayment cover that doesnt exist, i asked to be put through directly but she said they were closed.

 

Found a number on the Halifax website (says they are open to 10) but didnt have any answer after 10 minutes of constant ringing.

 

the Repayment cover is approx 25 quid this month and part of the issue with me being over the limit, want to get that taken off straight away while im trying to tackle it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is highly unlikely that you will get anywhere on the phone with these companies.

 

You need to write and insist that the cover is cancelled immediately.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with that - always put everything in writing, so nobody can say something different in the future. If you are told you cannot send a postal order then you want that in writing too, as it's clearly incorrect and needs complaining about to their head office. Same with stopping the policy, write to them.

 

I am also in the process of reclaiming PPI from the Halifax and the address I have been using is Halifax PPI Team, PO Box 814, Leeds, LS1 9NW

 

My original SAR was sent to the Halifax head office in Halifax. Halifax plc, Trinity Road, Halifax HX1 2RG

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bit of an update,

 

 

i finally got through on the phone (before reading the above posts) and cancelled the repayment cover on the credit card,

though im thinking of also including a second letter with the SAR re-iterating this.

 

 

While on the phone, the woman asked me straight away if i was going to be looking to reclaiming this money,

and gave me a phone number that deals directly with PPI from Credit Cards (0845 725 3519)

 

 

As i've also had two loans from Halifax where i am unsure about PPI,

 

 

i dont really know whether to persure the credit card directly,

or will i be able to make 1 general case for the credit card and two loans once in possession of the SAR?

Edited by paulh_85
Link to post
Share on other sites

Although you can get all the details on all account from your SAR I would tend to make separate claims for the credit card and the loans, that way you can keep to one topic in each write-up without confusing the poor souls who deal with the claims. :-)

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

...gave me a phone number that deals directly with PPI from Credit Cards (0845 725 3519)

Is Halifax Customer Relations, use 01422 326460 or 0207 649 9014 if it's cheaper to call from a mobile.

The information on claiming is given on http://www.halifax.co.uk/contactus/how-to-complain/complain-about-ppi/default.asp

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

hi. thanks for previous responses. Im now filling in my questionaire for the credit card.

 

 

As i wasnt even aware i had the repayment cover on the card, so as far as im aware it wouldnt have been properly explained to me at the time.

 

 

Problem i have is it was almost 8 years ago that i took the credit card out,

so specific details about when i initially took the card are fuzzy.

 

 

Just wondering if anyone could advice as the best thing to put down on the form .

 

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi. I remember the date i took the card, however i cant recall being sold the PPI on the card, which i only recently noticed i had. the question "why did you decide to take PPI" well, in honestly i dont remember deciding to take it at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case you pt that you did not decide to take it which effectively means that it was put on there without your knowledge.

 

Do any of the papers in the SAR give any clues as to how this might have been taken out?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i does show that i had signed for it yes, but i have no recollection of knowing what i had signed up for. to the point where, when ppi claims were first being investigated, i was convinced i didnt have any on the card because i wanted it. though it turns out i did have it on this one card

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...