Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Phone lost on way to repair shop


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Looking for some advice on what my rights are...

 

about 6 weeks ago i smashed my phone screen, and as i didn't have insurance found a repair company that would replace it. I paid them a small deposit and they arranged for a UPS courier to collect it from me and take it to their shop. Before it got to the shop the phone went missing (I assume stolen as they told me they found the empty box). UPS were investigating it, and told me i had to communicate with the repair shop directly and not them since they are the UPS customer and not me. So it's now way over the time limit UPS state they will investigate, but they wont tell me anything. Every time I call the shop they just tell me they haven't heard from UPS and can't do anything for me until they do.

 

So my question is are the phone shop responsible for compensating me or replacing my phone? I feel like i'm being fobbed off every time i call but it's difficult without knowing my rights. Can anyone help? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It went missing on 21st March and UPS started investigating it the following week as I understand. I have been calling the repair shop roughly twice a week as they have not communicated with me at all about it. I last spoke to them about a week ago when they told me they should have an answer for me by Monday 5th at the latest bu they haven't been in touch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More than enough time to comply with UPS lost package procedures. Ask the repair shop for the UPS reference number and then consider a MoneyClaim for the value of the phone.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Elite Phones and Computers based in Manchester. They have a lot of bad reviews online but because we went through a third party to find them we didn't see them. I did see that UPS say up to 10 days for an investigation, but when i told the repair shop they told me it's actually up to 28 days. I did point out several times that that's not what UPS website says but they just kept repeating the 28 days line... which we are now over anyway. So far have only spoken over the phone with them, although did get them to email me so that I had in writing that they were dealing with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This shifting of the burden on to the shoulders of the party who is officially "the customer", is a great trick for keeping out of trouble.

This kind of practice has been common with couriers, restaurants "you were only a guest - you didn't actually pay for the meal.), holiday companies ("... only the party leader can make a complaint ...") etc.

 

This stuff still goes on even though it is 15 years since the Contracts(Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

 

Right of third party to enforce contractual term.

 

(1)Subject to the provisions of this Act, a person who is not a party to a contract (a “third party”) may in his own right enforce a term of the contract if—

(a)the contract expressly provides that he may, or

(b)subject to subsection (2), the term purports to confer a benefit on him.

(2)Subsection (1)(b) does not apply if on a proper construction of the contract it appears that the parties did not intend the term to be enforceable by the third party.

(3)The third party must be expressly identified in the contract by name, as a member of a class or as answering a particular description but need not be in existence when the contract is entered into.

(4)This section does not confer a right on a third party to enforce a term of a contract otherwise than subject to and in accordance with any other relevant terms of the contract.

(5)For the purpose of exercising his right to enforce a term of the contract, there shall be available to the third party any remedy that would have been available to him in an action for breach of contract if he had been a party to the contract (and the rules relating to damages, injunctions, specific performance and other relief shall apply accordingly).

(6)Where a term of a contract excludes or limits liability in relation to any matter references in this Act to the third party enforcing the term shall be construed as references to his availing himself of the exclusion or limitation.

(7)In this Act, in relation to a term of a contract which is enforceable by a third party—

 

  • “the promisor” means the party to the contract against whom the term is enforceable by the third party, and
  • “the promisee” means the party to the contract by whom the term is enforceable against the promisor.

 

 

If you think that UPS are a more vulnerable or accessible target, then go for them and refuse to be brushed off and referred to the repairer. - Or you could attack both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest update is UPS are telling me that the claim the repair shop put in was not approved due to being improperly packaged - it wasn't. They apparently sent a letter to the repair shop to let them know this on 31st March.

 

So I guess the phone shop have been fobbing me off, telling me UPS haven't got back to them so that they don't have to deal with it. They have previously said to me over the phone that if UPS do not approve the claim then they don't actually have to compensate me - surely that's not true?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi deborahjane

 

How was the phone packaged? UPS are saying it was poorly packaged, they found the empty box, it sounds pathetic on the part of UPS, it sounds like it was stolen/lost in their care.

 

Firstly write a Formal Letter of Complaint , mark it as such. Explain what's happened (pick up phone deliver to shop), how they have let you down (lost phone) and what you want them to do (compensation).

Make sure you read Bankfodder's post - '7'.

 

 

Send it to:-

 

Ms Cindy Miller

President

UPS UK

cjmiller@ups.com

 

 

I think the shop have been foolish in not being totally upfront with you, telling you what UPS were saying ref 31st March. You should definitely get the deposit back and claim compensation.

 

The Supply of Goods and Services Act (1982) applies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...