Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Turn casual moments into unforgettable dates – choose the best casual dating site! Actual Girls [URL=https://matchnow.life]Super casual Dating[/URL]
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RBS - Lewis Debt Recovery - CCA


SHERLOCK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5603 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I really do try to keep to deadlines, its only when I have to pay 100's, as my A&L claim (MCOL due now) it becomes a bit of a stumbling block.

 

Hope i'm doing these right, have claimed their APR rate over the term of the account using one of the spreadsheets and I think that maybe, unless you are careful, the next parts of the claim can get a bit messy.

 

Its only a smallish claim but I don't know if they view them ALL with the same distaste

 

SHERLOCK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a letter this morning from RBS and it states:

 

They have lowered their fees to £12.00 from 28th June 2006!

 

It is not our policy to refund late payment/overlimit fees that were charged previously at a higher level at the time that the fee was incurred.

 

However, after due consideration and as a gesture of goodwill :rolleyes: , I have refunded the £###.## direct to the account. We will not be refunding any interest that you refer to.

 

Any refund made, which relates to charges levied on the account prior to the sale of the debt must be refunded directly to the account in question. Subsequently we have to legally advise the agents that they have bought a debt with an incorrect balance on it. The balance that LDR can legally collect on is reflected by the refund of chargs made in 2004 which we have refunded, thus leaving a balance of £###.## still to be repaid.

 

We have therefore had to forward the £###.## on to LDR to correct the outstanding balance they can collect on. This complies with RBSG 's legal requirements regarding debts that have been sold.

 

The file will be left open to ensure you have sufficient time to consider my comments.

 

YOUR COMMENTS PLEASE.

 

questions: Do I,

 

1) Continue claim for interest at their contractual rate and allow them to repay it to LDR?

 

2) Continue with my threat to leave claim open if it is not paid to me?

 

3) Send my LBA with requests as before.

 

# Not sure on debt related legal requirements for creditors?# :confused:

 

SHERLOCK

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I based my theory on, have I read it correctly?

 

'The account’s Terms and Conditions specify the interest payable on unauthorised drawings from the account. The Claimants hold that this applies to unauthorised drawings by the Defendant as well as to unauthorised drawings by the Claimants. Should the court deem this incorrect, the Claimants claim the rate to be justified under the principle of mutuality and reciprocity, and is based on the Defendant’s unauthorised overdraft interest rate that would be applied under the terms of the above mentioned account'.

 

SHERLOCK

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, a bit impatient there.

This was with cl finance previously, are the companies linked?

 

see, the bit about their legal obligation irks somewhat bcoz I have no contract with LDR, THEY JUST PURCHASED A DEBT.

My beef is with RBS who the debt is with and with whom I have an agreement.

 

They also state that LDR have bought a debt with an incorrect balance, the balance is correct if as the banks are claiming the charges are lawful, they can't have it both ways??

 

Thanks for your help,

 

SHERLOCK

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would seriously question the RBS reply.

We are well aware that Debts are bought and sold for a fraction of their original value to dcas.

It is not your problem that the dca has to be refunded and its likely to be nowhere near the figures they are trying to offset.(or the figures they tell you )

You should continue for the whole amount in your claim.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - I have been cogitating on this.

 

RBS can't have it both ways can they? On the one hand they seem to be admitting no liability "gesture of goodwill etc...". On the other hand they are saying that they sold a debt with the wrong balance on it. It is their responsibility not yours.

 

I have looked at the deed of assignment which I received from GE/C.L.Finance (which is Lewis Group) and nowhere on it is there any recourse for C.L. to go back should the balance be incorrect. The balance is, as stated as at the date of assignment. I would imagine that these deeds are pretty standard in terminology especially since, as it is Lewis Group buying the debt, they probably drew up terms.

 

Hope this helps a bit

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to type up a letter and run it past you guys/girls if that is o.k.

 

Was thinking of proceeding with a LBA with additional replies to their letter above, e.g. NOT MY PROBLEM ETC?

 

Also is it standard to refuse the interest that was added, came to around 50% of claim?

 

any suggestions welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please feel free to amend if letter may be 'legally' challenged or other??

 

 

Account Number: #### #### #### ####

 

 

Dear Madam,

 

I am disappointed that you imply you have the right to contact third parties on my behalf and to make payments on accounts that you no longer have legal entitlement.

You no longer have ownership rights to this alleged debt and are under no circumstances to make payments to third parties.

 

On date of assignment of the debt amount to The Lewis Group, one assumes any contract between RBSG and myself to be terminated.

 

As such I state that you are no longer given permission to exchange or discuss any details regarding the above account with any third party, failure to respond to my request may lead to possible legal proceedings.

 

Your contract with The Lewis Group has no bearing upon any communications with ourselves.

 

I request that all data regarding the above account be deleted from your system.

 

Please find enclosed my Letter Before Action as stated in my previous letter of ##th December 2006.

 

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

SHERLOCK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - on the assumption that you are carrying on - how does this sound:

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated ***** and have noted the contents therein.

 

I am disappointed that you have decided to ignore my request for direct payment and

I now require clarification please regarding your assertion that funds must legally be remitted to LDR rather than to me. I can find no legislation which substantiates this assertion and would be grateful if you could provide reference to the relevant statutory provision(s).

 

You have also made payment excluding the contractual interest which I requested in my preliminary correspondence. Please note that this claim was not for statutory interest which is payable should matters progress to court but, rather contractual interest which I believe is payable immediately on the basis of a mutual and reciprocal relationship with your organisation. It is not up to RBSG to decide whether I am entitled to this rate of interest but, rather is at the discretion of the court should it remain unpaid before litigation.

 

To clarify my position, I will not consider this matter resolved until I have received payment personally which includes interest at the contractual rate mentioned in previous correspondence.

 

You have 14 days in which to reply in a satisfactory manner before I commence litigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here it is folks,

 

RBSG sold the account to the Lewis Group and no longer have any legal rights to the account and the Lewis Group now own the debt. We have to pass the refund to them direct. No clarification of why? Are they breaching Data Protection Act Rules by contacting LDR when they have no longer, any legal rights over the account (is this claim anything to do with LDR).

 

As the account was a debt owing to the RBSG, any agreed refund would be applied direct to the account to reduce the debt. If we had not sold the debt, RBSG would not have given the refund to you direct, as this refund would not have left the account in credit. Agreed, but is it relevant to my claim?

 

The OFT agreed that we did not have to refund any interest in cases such as these. However, as a gesture of goodwill I have refunded the interest that you quoted. This has also been passed to LDR and they will be collecting a balance of £000.00. They have gone from 'we will not pay any interest showing', to refunding at contractual rate!

 

Leave file open, give me opportunity to address any concerns, also contact Ombudsman.

 

What do you reckon, REPLIES WELCOME :)

 

 

They have stated they will refund all the claim, now the issue is do they refund to me??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here it is folks,

 

RBSG sold the account to the Lewis Group and no longer have any legal rights to the account and the Lewis Group now own the debt. We have to pass the refund to them direct. No clarification of why? Are they breaching Data Protection Act Rules by contacting LDR when they have no longer, any legal rights over the account (is this claim anything to do with LDR). Exactly, your whole point was that they had no legal rights over this account! It would seem that they are unable to quote any legislation which legally obliges them to do this .

 

As the account was a debt owing to the RBSG, any agreed refund would be applied direct to the account to reduce the debt. If we had not sold the debt, RBSG would not have given the refund to you direct, as this refund would not have left the account in credit. Agreed, but is it relevant to my claim? NO

 

The OFT agreed that we did not have to refund any interest in cases such as these. However, as a gesture of goodwill I have refunded the interest that you quoted. This has also been passed to LDR and they will be collecting a balance of £000.00. They have gone from 'we will not pay any interest showing', to refunding at contractual rate! Isn't that interesting ?- I would be interested to see that particular OFT report

 

Leave file open, give me opportunity to address any concerns, also contact Ombudsman.

 

What do you reckon, REPLIES WELCOME :)

 

 

They have stated they will refund all the claim, now the issue is do they refund to me??

 

 

I am in a very similar situation as I have just found out that GE Group have refunded charges (but, no interest) to LDR and not me. I sent a letter out which was very similar to your own. It is up to you how you proceed from now on. I don't think that they are able to back up what they have done legally and yes, I would imagine that if they have been liaising with LDR about a debt they no longer have rights over, there is a data protection issue involved as well. The fact that they have paid you out at the contractual rate without going to court suggests that they are worried about being able to justify the way they have gone about this. I know that you wanted to be in a position to negotiate with LDR yourself (as I do) but, you have been paid out at contractual without going to court. I guess, what I am trying to say is that you have the option of refusing to acknowledge the payments as they have not been made to you personally as you have specified or forgetting about the fact that they have not complied with your request but, that your debt has cleared (and you managed to get the contractual rate).

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...