Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital one - Incorrect data / over charged interest / Default amount incorrect


RossW
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3717 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Slightly odd question, have looked though the forum but cant seem to find anything on it.

 

if the data provided to 3rd parties about you by your credit card company is factually incorrect, are they in breach of the DPA or CCA, If so do you know what section?

 

Also who is responsible for ensuring the accruacy of the data displayed on the CRA, the supplier or the CRA?

 

 

Ross

Link to post
Share on other sites

both

 

whats the issue please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Information Commissioners Office and the Dept. of Business & Skills.

 

 

The CRAs rely on the honesty / accuracy of data supplied by creditors etc.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capital one have supplied factually incorrect information to the CRA

Default ammount is incorrect (£1 more than settlement figure I received )

The settlement date has been supplied wrong.

 

I have contacted them, informed them of there mistake and they won't change it.

 

Also contacted the CRA who looked in to it, and capital one replied saying that "all information supplied is correct".

 

When I have evidence it's not.(bank statmebts, corrosponace from capital one).

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must take this up with the Data Controller at Cap 1 as a formal complaint send all the "evidence " you have including the screen print of the CRA file.

 

 

It's hard to see that this would be affecting your credit profile unless the settlement date is vastly incorrect.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Goven them 3 chances to fix this issue, which is including the wrong APR, over charging of interest. Processing data which is false.

 

Would it be unfair to skip the FOS part and take direct court action

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you would be best reporting to FOS as if this has to go to litigation its decision will give you some idea as to success of court action.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everybody,

 

I'm after some advice regarding this hideous company.

 

Back in 2011 i received a notice to default letter, believed i paid the balance in full straight away.

 

My credit file has a default date registered for the 14.09.2011 for £314 with a settled date of the same date.

 

I never received any further correspondence from them after this point, no 'you've been defaulted' letters, nothing.

 

Apparently, I never paid this balance on that date, according to them i paid it on the 31.01.2013 (Yet my credit file has the date of the 14.08.2011).

I've contacted the CRAs telling them that the data is wrong, The response from capital one was that ' all the data is correct ', meaning the settlement date would stand?

 

It was also pointed out that the default amount was wrong, because they had over charged interest between April 2011 and April 2012 (The account was refunded this, 96pence).

 

So id like some advice on what todo as i've complained about this and its on going, but i thought id get some advice in to the following:

 

1. Reporting incorrect data to the CRAs (Dates, Amounts).

2. Overcharging interest.

 

This matter is being delt with by somebody at the 'Executive Response Center'

 

I'm looking for some advice as to if any what rules/guidelines/legislation they have broken, As i have a feeling this will be going to court,

 

Ideally id like them to remove any trace of themselves from my credit file - as they clearly cant handle my data in an accurate manner.

 

Sorry i've i have rambled,

 

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

One more thing, can you add charges once the default has been registered? Default register date on CRAs is £290, Settlement was £313, would also be worth pointing out that the credit limit was £200.

Link to post
Share on other sites

one option is to involve the ICO

also, a notice of correction of wrong info which could involve the ico eg #4 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?323570-Default-Info

a default date should not be 'renewed'.

was the default legit in the first place seeing as you say you paid the 'arrears' in time?

some ICO default info http://www.scoronline.co.uk/files/sc...ment_final.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default wasn't correct in its entirety, it was caused by a previous late payment fee which took the card over its limit, which induced another fee and so on.

 

I paid the full balance and closed the account as soon as i received the notice of default warning letter, I was also over charged interest, surely thats got to be a breach of the CCA or something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

possibly. i think it is the ico or oft guide that says that where there is arrears/default solely due to charges then it shouldn't be. maybe see what their 'exec' comes back with, if no joy take things further?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks,

 

I have requested a SAR so will be able to see what comes back,

 

I must admit, the exec did sound like he was on work experiance, had to go away and check a lot of stuff with a co workers

Link to post
Share on other sites

ICO Guidance 2014.

A default should not be places IF The default sum is made up Solely of fees and charges.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers brig

 

ross, is it in complaint atm with them?

 

The origanal issue is, I have a SAR request due to arrive this week, I will be adding the charges to the complaint too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, no paper work at all hence the sar request, even if they did send one it would be wrong as they over charged interest for 12months. Just a complete show of incompetence from them

Link to post
Share on other sites

looking good in yr favour? in any event a formal def notice, if applicable, is required prior to any registered default as it gives the opp for any default to be remedied.

note also poss compensation re damages re credit file re an 'unlawful' default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, little update.

 

SAR request came, confirms that the default was incorrectly filed (wrong amount )

 

The sting in the tail is, and I really do need some advice on this... I receieved somebody elses SAR request... I will dispose of it sercurely and call the guy, but what do I do now ??

 

To confirm , o received two sar requests, mine and somebody elses

Link to post
Share on other sites

not entirely sure, could also informally check with the ICO see what they think should do?

any event, a complaint to the creditor by you both. both should be entitled to compensation from the creditor (the ICO doesnt award comp to individuals, but they can fine and/or reprimand co's).

this incident should put cred further on the back foot!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, little update.

 

SAR request came, confirms that the default was incorrectly filed (wrong amount )

 

The sting in the tail is, and I really do need some advice on this... I receieved somebody elses SAR request... I will dispose of it sercurely and call the guy, but what do I do now ??

 

 

To confirm , o received two sar requests, mine and somebody elses

 

 

Are you saying you had your data in full plus a 3rd parties data?

 

 

Do not dispose of it, contact the Data Controller at Capone in writing and infirm them of the serious breach of the DPA and let then arrange to retrieve the data.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying you had your data in full plus a 3rd parties data?

 

 

Do not dispose of it, contact the Data Controller at Capone in writing and infirm them of the serious breach of the DPA and let then arrange to retrieve the data.

 

Exactly that, my full SAR plus another individuals SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...