Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Excessive ppi calls


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3727 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been getting 6-10 calls a day from an Indian call centre trying to get me into a PPI reclaim for a loan I know I have never had.

 

I did the usual checks to ensure that a loan had not been made in my name and could find nothing.

 

When you get passed through its always through to the same company "MEDIA TACTICS".

 

I have asked them to stop calling by both phone and email. I

 

have sent a section 11 notice to cease using my details for direct marketing.

 

I have made complaints to TPS,ICO and MOF Claims regulation unit but still the calls continue.

 

Any ideas on how to get them to stop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

This Indian call centre would have a contract with Media Tactics and as such the call centre has to follow UK rules

You have complained to the TPS. I assume you are registered?

 

Do you have call blocking? Do they use different numbers to call you?

 

Can you get your telephone provider to intervene?

 

You could get a call screening device such as trucall and once set up, only the numbers you allow will get through.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am TPS registered and have complained to TPS regarding these calls. 312 since August 2013. Have submitted complaint to ICO (Dec 12 2013). Have had a acknowledgement and they have started an investigation but still no outcome to enquiries. Complained to MOJ Claims regulation unit and investigation has begun. Sent section 11 notice Oct 2013 with no change in call volume. Have had email response from Media Tactics basically saying that the calls are not their responsibility despite ICO regulations 21-25.

The calls received are VOIP (voice over internet protocol) that my phone service provider is unable to filter or block. Have call blocking equipment that filters out international numbers (which is the ident on these calls) which also means I filter out call from friends and family who live abroad. I don't see why I should have to change the phone number I have had for 16 years just because of these rogue operators. I have been harassed by these people for months and can see no possible remedy. I am now thinking of getting a solicitor involved to get a writ for the section 11 notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...