Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • old and new threads merged i though you were going to send the SB letter in 2017? dx  
    • dunno you've not scanned up what you've had before how can we tell?  
    • Today , after a lot of years i received a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we haven't had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. up to 2000 I had successfully gotten deferment on low income. But rather than sign on as unemployed ,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondence ceased from them, circa 2001. To date I have had no correspondence from Student Loans. I was made redundant in 2009 and reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now , today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A Bitter Taste, But What Next?


Inzi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3760 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My issues began when I sat trying to organise my finances,

as having recently become a single parent

my finances are going to be extremely tight if I'm not careful.

My sometimes awful management of money cannot continue.

 

I had an idea come to mind.

It involved creating an individual savings account per event,

per bill

and per any other expense envisioned.

 

I went about putting this into practice.

 

Created the accounts,

named them as per their purpose

and even added what amount is due in each ones title.

 

It worked, I could create as many savings accounts as I desired (14),

then have all my money transferring on pre-determined dates as required.

That's where I left it for now though

- I'd have came back on to set the transfers another day.

 

Soon [1night, or 1or2 days] after I've done this

and the bank has let me create these accounts,

my internet banking becomes blocked by the bank.

 

On my first phone call,

I was told quite literally:

Close these accounts or find another bank.

 

I react by showing surprise (in tones mainly, few non offensive nor aggravating words),

but soon accept it's their show.

I fully agreed to closure of those accounts in order for me to regain internet banking access.

 

I'm told my internet banking should now allow access.

It doesn't, so I gave it a day or two.

 

(This operator handling the above had the most awful manner. I'm a polite man (I hope).

Her undertones were though - whilst remaining employable - those of a discreetly belittling context.)

 

The second phone call.

 

More of the same (except for a great attitude from operators from here onwards).

 

A different variation on the explanation for why the bank is not allowing my multiple accounts,

but told the delay on regaining access is due to closure of the savings accounts taking up to 4 days.

 

A week later.

Another call or two.

I'm now told I must take identification into the bank

...then...

my problem will be resolved.

 

It's feeling a very drawn out issue by now, even the phone bill is entering my mind.

 

But, I reluctantly pop into the local Halifax branch as requested.

 

The gent takes my ID,

makes his call to resolve the problem,

 

He came off the phone and informs me I've been sent a letter,

stating that all bank accounts are being closed in 60 days time. (!!!!????)

He also mentioned that a repayment plan will "probably" be set up in order to repay the overdraft.

 

I feel utterly gob-smacked, penalised and a little bit humiliated

- particularly after having been a customer for 12 years.

 

I'm sure I've not got a leg to stand on.

But now feel completely deflated

- taken steps to move on with my tail between my legs -

but wondering if I've just been bullied out of my Current Account for unfair reasons.

If they'd spent I feel mere minutes, they'd have seen the accounts have not been used fraudulently.

 

My minds floating between...

Account closed due to them;

A combination of their lack of having a limit in place

and then lack of properly looking into my case?

Account closed due to me;

I'm at fault, as they should never have been expected to limit number I could create

through their internet banking site?

 

There has been only a matter of 40 pounds shared between a few of these savings accounts,

if the history is properly reviewed, it's clear I've done no wrong.

 

If they'd SIMPLY had set a limit on the number somebody can create,

I'd not be here now and still have my 12 year old bank account.

I have to wonder, would they have done this to a man with millions,

would he have the time invested into justly treating him?

 

Please.

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

 

Am I being penalised?

 

Or does me being penalised for their poorly implemented limitations matter?

 

I'm not even sure what to ask.

 

I'd just be grateful for any direction.

 

I'm more than happy to answer any questions (I think).

 

~ Neil

Edited by Inzi
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Niel

 

Unfortunately the company can close your accounts whenever they see fit.

 

Try moving to another bank... Etc, why not try first direct or coop

Link to post
Share on other sites

A shame as they showed pathetic management of this case. They hang you out to dry like no other industry can - that's not right.

 

I've applied to other banks already. I immediately upon returning home went for a couple of the 'basic' accounts. Liking what I see of the Think Money account, so I think I'll be accepting their terms when they show up. It certainly sounds a nice prospect only being able to see the cash I have to spend in my bank account available to me. That'll alleviate some of my idiocy.

 

Also having the paperwork sent to me from the co-op'. But worry about any potential bounced payment charges, I would rather pay Think Money's flat rate of £14,95 just to be safe for now.

 

One positive is that I wasn't going to be able to clear my overdraft any time soon. As a result I was paying 28 pound or more a month in charges. Now, I get to clear my overdraft in instalments, something I only months ago enquired about - yet Halifax couldn't facilitate.

 

When they come calling to discuss a repayment plan for the overdraft. They'll soon come to realise how low my available funds are. I'll be armed with every expenditure I have, they're in for a long repayment plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...