Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Not being paid what I'm due.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3766 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi and thanks for reading this saga.

I started as a home carer in aug 2012, where it was stated in interview that I would recieve 20p per mile travelling between clients homes and minimum wage for the travel time.

Each saturday we recieve the following weeks rota which lists clients to visit, the time to go, the length of visit and the travel time in minutes. Sometimes they dont have time between addresses so the travel time is zero. Now I questioned this verbally and was told "it all gets put right at payroll" which i took on good faith.

After the first couple of months I realised the petrol money and travel time fell somewhat short of what I was spending on fuel etc so I went thru and worked out what it should be, these scribblings will be on my rotas which we hand in every week. Any way they then up'd my hours and with one thing and another I worked all last year keeping my head down as advised by other staff. I was at some point told if the gap between calls is longer than 45mins we dont get paid anything, then 1.5hrs, eventually checked with the office and they said 1 hour.

In December 2013 I got truly fed up and started working it out properly and recording it on my rota with the question about why such a discrency btween what I was being paid and my reckonings.

No reply.

Next week I took it to HR manager who call the owner over, who called the top manager over and all they said was "it gets put right in payroll". I disagreed politely, showing my workings out and the rotas, to which they said no, the rota gets altered for payroll but they would look into it.

What I found out is on average each month I am short about £10 petrol (50 miles) and £30 in time (roughly 5hrs or so).

They said the mileage always works out to roughly what it should be but it clearly doesn't and the time even worse,

To date nobody has got back to me, 21st Feb 14.

I will now put it in writing when the owner comes back from 2 weeks hols.

So thanks for wading thru this but my questions are,

Why are they, and are they allowed to, alter my rota that Ive signed off on, on a payroll system? Without my knowledge of why they are changing it or to what they are changing it to?

Can I ask for it all to be checked back to the start of my employ from my original rotas? Am I right in thinking they can't deny me access to these or have destroyed them?

Yesterday the HR manager said she didnt see the owner budging and paying what I'm owed but how, when it's in black and white can she refuse?

Long winded but tried to include all details.

Many thanks peeps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I would be annoyed too if my employer did this. I expect the forum guys will be along over the course of the day with advice for you.

 

Not related to what you're asking, but my understanding is that HMRC let you claim more than 20p per mile. Are you doing this? It would be a small help to you.

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/incometax/relief-mileage.htm

 

My best, HB

Edited by honeybee13
HMRC link.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks honeybee13,

 

Yes the government allow me to claim 45p, but it's tax relief on the other 25p so I get a slightly higher tax code but again that was based on the mileage given by my employer which as I've worked out is wrong! As an aside my employer charges clients 50p per mile which just makes me feel even more hard done too lol :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do the 5 hours you're short bring your hourly rate paid below minimum wage for the hours worked?

 

Hmm interesting, in theory it would if applied only to the travel time.

However this is where the disagreement is, how much travel time I'm due. They have said its all worked out by payroll, so presumably a mapping system linked to it tho I dont know if such a system exists, they certainly arent keen on showing me. They have compared it to aa, rac etc and their system works out about the same.

I have also compared each route finder and although google is by far the most generous with time none of them are like the time they have paid me for. All have the same mileage as expected. But this again is paid short. So something is happening that they aint saying in my book.

Edited by hilly860
Link to post
Share on other sites

This kind of thing is rife in the Care industry. Mrs Sidewinder endured it for several years and in her final year (before moving to working in a Care Home with far less travel overheads!) we calculated that she spent over £1200 in fuel, of which she received zero contribution from the employer, and nothing at all for travel time - in fact for some jobs she would be spending £3 in fuel and travelling for around half an hour, for a half hour assignment which paid around £4. Scandalous, as you can be sure that the provider's cost for the job was calculated to include travel time and mileage.

 

At least your employer has a system - of sorts - although from what you have said you do need to challenge this as it looks as though you are being short-changed, but the being out of pocket for fuel is, I'm afraid, par for the course for that particular industry. You so also need to make sure that you also submit an expenses claim to HMRC at the end of each tax year. The 20p you have quoted is below the 45p per mile (up to the first 10,000 miles) that HMRC allows, so you may claim against tax paid for the difference. It isn't a fortune, and the maximum allowance will not exceed the tax that you pay in a year, but you might as well have it - and the £60 per year that HMRC allows for laundry of your uniform.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks sidewinder, yes I do claim for what I'm due with the taxman. But that tax relief is short if the mileage is wrong. My NI is short if they arent paying me what I'm due and yes I havent moved jobs cos it does seem to be par for course that we get treated like chumps but if we let them what can we expect? I cant believe nobody anywhere is making a stand against this sort of employer!

I want to make a stand, I'm not an idiot and thats why if anyone can just give me some inkling on the questions I first raised it would be appreciated.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...