Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCJ for alleged overpayment


stephen317
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

In 2007 I worked for a short time in a school. Cutting a long story short I resigned because my depression crept up and I got an email from my manager saying, it was better to resign because i did not declare it. I didn't have to and felt it would be a bad move I resigned and said there was a lack of support.

I then found out there had been an alleged overpayment of salary. I argued at the time this was wrong, but they went ahead with the CCJ. At the time this was all going through I was very ill diagnosed with complex PTSD...(won't bore you)

I started looking at my finances this year with someone and we decided to look into it. That we discovered was that I was employed on a salary that was advertised, but later found this was incorrect and in fact I was on a lower salary.

The Local Authority has argued this and today sent a letter saying there was an error, but all we will do is adjust the amount of the CCJ. I did a SAR request and there was nothing to clarify the overpayment, the payslips show the lower salary, but no overpayment. The LA seem to have missed the point, all along I was right there was an error in the initial job advert, then the salary and then the way they have handled things. Even when threatened with the CCJ I said there was an error and that I would pay £10 a month, they took this as an admission.

I feel a little cheesed off with this, as it stands I have written to the local MP and chief executive. The CCJ has been very destructive in my life and I even took out a CCJ to try and deal with the debts. This was all at a time I was not myself and because of my medication had my driving license revoked.

Any help please..........I advise people on mental health and debt and benefits, but myself, well what is it they say

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, there are some key questions you'll need to answer before getting clear advice.

,br>When was the CCJ granted?

 

How much, roughly, was the CCJ for? How much should it have been for?

 

If the CCJ was originally granted for the lower amount would you still have had the same debt problems?

 

Did you ever contest the amount in court? If not, why not?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thank you, the original CCJ was issued in 2010 and was for a figure not including court fees of £662.01.

 

The recalculated amount they sent this week is £575.55 so the ccj was wrong by £86 ish

 

When I was threatened with court I offered them £10 a month, but stated in the letter that I maintain this is a error, mainly because of the amount and that i disputed the overpayment because as far as I remember i got paid and there was no second amount. Since then I have seen payslips and there is no listing of overpayment, only what I was paid. I contested the amount several times before and in the letter I sent.

I went to court, had a one to one with someone, i dont remember it being under oath and at the time was not myself, but maintained it was a mistake.

It is more the fact the CCJ has crippled me with things such as renting a property and car insurance as they need credit checks, so I have had to accept some ropey places.

If they could have proved the overpayment rather than the way they did it, then fine, but i maintained all along it was an error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have already been to court and the court made a decision, it will be very difficult to have the CCJ set aside now unfortunately. A set aside application generally must be made within 2 months. However when the debt is paid the council should inform the court and you will be able to get a certificate of satisfaction, and have the CCJ marked satisfied on your credit record.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...